technical paper
Comparison of Updates to Living Systematic Reviews Related to COVID-19 vs Other Subjects | VIDEO
keywords:
citations and impact factor
pandemic science
dissemination of information
Objective Living systematic reviews (LSRs) are systematic
reviews that are constantly updated to incorporate new
evidence once it becomes available. 1 The aim of this study was
to assess the frequency of updates to LSRs and the influence
of COVID-19 on updates.
Design A cohort study of all LSRs indexed in PubMed, from
inception to 2020, was performed, which were followed up
until 2021. A PubMed search was conducted on September
2021 using the term living systematic review to retrieve
articles published until December 31, 2020. Only the first
version of the LSR was considered; protocols, conceptual
papers, and other types of research were excluded. In
January 2022, updates of included LSRs until December 31,
2021, were searched; the 2020 Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
was collected from Journal Citation Reports; the open-access
status of the articles (if publicly available in full text or not)
was checked; and the LSR subject (COVID-19 or not) was
assessed. The number of months from publication of the
original LSR to its first update stratified by COVID-19 subject
was calculated and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was
performed. Regression analysis using Cox proportional
hazards models was conducted to calculate the hazard ratios
(HRs) with 95% CIs adjusted by JIF and open-access status
to minimize potential confounding.
Results Of 104 reports retrieved, 52 were original LSRs and
were included in the study. Most LSRs were published in
2020 (33 of 52), and 19 were published between 2004 and
2019. Most articles were open access (50 of 52) and half had
COVID-19 as the subject (28 of 52). As of December 31, 2021,
a total of 60% (31 of 52) of the LSRs had been updated, taking
a mean (SD) of 14 (3) months for the first update; 21 LSRs
were not updated after a mean (SD) of 25 (4) months of
publication. LSRs about COVID-19 were updated faster (n =
28; mean SD, 9 1 months) than LSRs about other subjects
(n = 24; mean SD, 30 4 months; Figure 7). COVID-19
subject (HR, 3.64 95% CI, 1.38-9.63; P = .009) and higher
JIF (HR, 1.10 95% CI, 1.05-1.17; P < .001) were associated
with a higher probability of updating LSRs over time, while
open-access status had no association with LSR updates (HR,
1.27 95% CI, 0.16-10.25; P = .82).
Conclusions This study identified a limited number of LSRs
(52), and 60% of them were updated in about 1 year. Nearly 2
dozen were never updated despite having been published for
2 years, on average; future research may assess the reasons
involved. The rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic and
available research potentially favored more updated LSRs.
LSRs published in high-impact journals were also more likely
to be updated.
Reference
1. Elliott JH, Synnot A, Turner T, et al. Living systematic
review: 1. introduction: the why, what, when, and how. J Clin
Epidemiol. 2017;91:23-30. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010
Conflict of Interest Disclosures None reported.