China

Humans can learn to solve new tasks by inducing high-level strategies from example solutions to similar problems and then adapting these strategies to solve unseen problems. Can we use large language models to induce such high-level structure from example documents or solutions? We introduce fLSA, a foundation-model-based Latent Semantic Analysis method that iteratively clusters and tags document segments based on document-level contexts. These tags can be used to model the latent structure of given documents and for hierarchical sampling of new texts. Our experiments on story writing, math, and multi-step reasoning datasets demonstrate that fLSA tags are more informative in reconstructing the original texts than existing tagging methods. Moreover, when used for hierarchical sampling, fLSA tags help expand the output space in the right directions that lead to correct solutions more often than direct sampling and hierarchical sampling with existing tagging methods.

EMNLP 2025

fLSA: Learning Semantic Structures in Document Collections Using Foundation Models

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Interpreting Noun-Noun Compounds remains a persistent challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) because the semantic relation between the modifier and the head is rarely stated explicitly. Recent benchmarks frame Noun-Noun Compound Interpretation as a multiple-choice question. This setting, although prompts LLMs to yield more controlled results, still suffer from two main limitations: vague relation descriptions and failure to handle polysemous compounds. We introduce a dual-faceted textual enrichment framework that augments prompts. Description enrichment paraphrases relations into event‑oriented descriptions instantiated with the target compound to explicitly surface the hidden event connecting head and modifier. Conditioned enrichment identifies polysemous compounds leveraging qualia-role binding and assigns each compound with condition cues for disambiguation. Our method yields consistently higher accuracy across three LLM families. These gains suggest that surfacing latent compositional structure and contextual constraint is a promising path toward deeper semantic understanding in language models. The data and codebase will be made publicly available.

Enhanced Noun-Noun Compound Interpretation through Textual Enrichment

Legal citation detection in court judgments underpins reliable precedent mapping, citation analytics, and document retrieval. Extracting references to legislation and case law in the United Kingdom is especially challenging: citation styles have evolved over centuries, and judgments routinely cite foreign or historical authorities. We conduct the first systematic comparison of three modelling paradigms on this task using the Cambridge Law Corpus: (i) rule‑based regular expressions; (ii) transformer-based encoders (BERT, RoBERTa, LEGAL‑BERT, ModernBERT); and (iii) large language models (GPT‑4.1). We produced a gold‑standard high-quality corpus of 190 court judgments containing 45,179 fine-grained annotations for UK and non-UK legislation and case references. ModernBERT achieves a macro-averaged F1 of 93.3%, only marginally ahead of the other encoder-only models, yet significantly outperforming the strongest regular-expression baseline (35.42% F1) and GPT-4.1 (76.57% F1).

Detecting Legal Citations in United Kingdom Court Judgments

Retrieval-augmented language models have demonstrated performance comparable to much larger models while requiring fewer computational resources. The effectiveness of these models crucially depends on the overlap between query and retrieved context, but the optimal degree of this overlap remains unexplored. In this paper, we systematically investigate how varying levels of query--context overlap affect model performance during both training and inference. Our experiments reveal that increased overlap initially has minimal effect, but substantially improves test-time perplexity and accelerates model learning above a critical threshold. Building on these findings, we demonstrate that deliberately increasing overlap through synthetic context can enhance data efficiency and reduce training time by approximately 40% without compromising performance. We specifically generate synthetic context through paraphrasing queries. We validate our perplexity-based findings on question-answering tasks, confirming that the benefits of retrieval-augmented language modeling extend to practical applications. Our results provide empirical evidence of significant optimization potential for retrieval mechanisms in language model pretraining.

Studying the Role of Input-Neighbor Overlap in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Training Efficiency

Inductive link prediction is emerging as a key paradigm for real-world knowledge graphs (KGs), where new entities frequently appear and models must generalize to them without retraining. Predicting links in a KG faces the challenge of guessing previously unseen entities by leveraging generalizable node features such as subgraph structure, type annotations, and ontological constraints. However, explicit type information is often lacking or incomplete. Even when available, type information in most KGs is often coarse-grained, sparse, and prone to errors due to human annotation. In this work, we explore the potential of pre-trained language models (PLMs) to enrich node representations with implicit type signals. We introduce TyleR, a Type-less yet type-awaRe approach for subgraph-based inductive link prediction that leverages PLMs for semantic enrichment. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that TyleR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in scenarios with scarce type annotations and sparse graph connectivity. To ensure reproducibility, we share our code at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/tyler-7C2C/ .

Type-Less yet Type-Aware Inductive Link Prediction with Pretrained Language Models

The paper shows that parameter-efficient reinforcement learning (PE-RL) is a highly effective training regime to improve large language models' (LLMs) ability to answer queries on sensitive topics with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV), i.e. to provide significantly more informative, diverse and impartial answers. This is shown by evaluating PE-RL and multiple strong baselines---including LoRA finetuning (strongest baseline), SFT and RLHF. PE-RL not only improves on overall NPOV quality compared to the strongest baseline (97.06\% rightarrow 99.08\%), but also scores much higher on features linguists identify as key to separating good answers from the best answers (60.25\% rightarrow 85.21\% for presence of supportive details, 68.74\% rightarrow 91.43\% for absence of oversimplification). A qualitative analysis corroborates this. Finally, our evaluation finds no statistical differences between results on topics that appear in the training dataset and those on separated evaluation topics, which provides strong evidence that our approach to training PE-RL exhibits very effective out of topic generalization. To enable the study, and enable further future studies we also release the dataset, SHQ-NPOV, and provide a methodology to create such datasets through iterative rounds of human peer-critique and annotator training.

Improving Neutral Point-of-View Generation with Data- and Parameter-Efficient RL

Adapter parameters provide a mechanism to modify the behavior of machine learning models and have gained significant popularity in the context of large language models (LLMs) and generative AI. These parameters can be merged to support multiple tasks via a process known as task merging. However, prior work on merging in LLMs, particularly in natural language processing, has been limited to scenarios where each test example addresses only a single task. In this paper, we focus on on-device settings and study the problem of text-based compositional multi-tasking, where each test example involves the simultaneous execution of multiple tasks. For instance, generating a translated summary of a long text requires solving both translation and summarization tasks concurrently. To facilitate research in this setting, we propose a benchmark comprising four practically relevant compositional tasks. We also present an efficient method (Learnable Calibration) tailored for on-device applications, where computational resources are limited, emphasizing the need for solutions that are both resource-efficient and high-performing. Our contributions lay the groundwork for advancing the capabilities of LLMs in real-world multi-tasking scenarios, expanding their applicability to complex, resource-constrained use cases.

Efficient Compositional Multi-tasking for On-device Large Language Models

Across languages, numeral systems vary widely in how they construct and combine numbers. While humans consistently learn to navigate this diversity, large language models (LLMs) struggle with linguistic-mathematical puzzles involving cross-linguistic numeral systems, which humans can learn to solve successfully. We investigate why this task is difficult for LLMs through a series of experiments that untangle the linguistic and mathematical aspects of numbers in language. Our experiments establish that models cannot consistently solve such problems unless the mathematical operations in the problems are explicitly marked using known symbols (+, times, etc, as in "twenty + three"). In further ablation studies, we probe how individual parameters of numeral construction and combination affect performance. While humans use their linguistic understanding of numbers to make inferences about the implicit compositional structure of numerals, LLMs seem to lack this notion of implicit numeral structure. We conclude that the ability to flexibly infer compositional rules from implicit patterns in human-scale data remains an open challenge for current reasoning models.

Investigating the interaction of linguistic and mathematical reasoning in language models using multilingual number puzzles

Today, Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping the norms of human communication, sometimes decoupling words from genuine human thought. This transformation is deep, and undermines the trust and interpretive norms that were historically tied to authorship. We draw from linguistic philosophy and AI ethics to detail how large-scale text generation can induce semantic drift, erode accountability, and obfuscate intent and authorship. Our work here introduces conceptual frameworks including hybrid authorship graphs (modeling humans, LLMs, and texts in a provenance network), epistemic doppelgängers (LLM-generated texts that are indistinguishable from human-authored texts), and authorship entropy. We explore mechanisms such as “proof-of-interaction” authorship verification and educational reforms to restore confidence in language. While LLMs' benefits are undeniable (broader access, increased fluency, automation, etc.), the upheavals they introduce to the linguistic landscape demand reckoning. This paper provides a conceptual lens to chart these changes.

Large Language Models Threaten Language's Epistemic and Communicative Foundations

Variation is inherent in opinion-based annotation tasks, such as sentiment or hate speech analysis. It does not only arise from errors, fatigue, or sentence ambiguity, but also from genuine differences in opinion shaped by background, experience, and culture. In this paper, we show how annotators' confidence ratings can be of great use for disentangling subjective variation from uncertainty, and how they can be approximated by behavioral gaze features. We showcase the utilization of our approach through a hate speech detection task, showing that models are affected differently by instances of uncertainty and subjectivity. We demonstrate that human gaze patterns offer valuable indicators of subjective variation and uncertainty.

Disentangling Subjectivity and Uncertainty for Hate Speech Annotation and Modeling using Gaze

Transformers often struggle to generalize to longer sequences than those seen during training - a limitation known as length extrapolation. Most existing Relative Positional Encoding (RPE) methods attempt to address this by introducing either fixed linear biases or globally learned biases, which lack the capacity to adapt to different input contexts. In this work, we propose an additive RPE, Context-Aware Biases for Length Extrapolation (CABLE), a method that learns token-specific, context-aware biases for each attention head in transformers. By dynamically adjusting positional biases based on the input sequence, CABLE overcomes the rigidity of fixed RPEs. When evaluated on sequences longer than originally trained with, GPT-2 Medium (334M parameters) with CABLE achieves lower perplexity than counterparts using other widely adopted positional encoding methods. Additionally, by applying CABLE to the BERT base model we improved performance in long-context retrieval tasks. Our method significantly enhances the extrapolation performance of existing RPE methods tested on the FineWeb-Edu-10B and WikiText-103 datasets.

Premium content

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Enhanced Noun-Noun Compound Interpretation through Textual Enrichment

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES