data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90485/90485c76eb9ccb7c8d66c4962e653dab68136909" alt="Lecture image placeholder"
Premium content
Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90485/90485c76eb9ccb7c8d66c4962e653dab68136909" alt="Lecture placeholder background"
poster
Chain of Logic: Rule-Based Reasoning with Large Language Models
keywords:
prompting methods
rule-based reasoning
chain of logic
legal reasoning
in-context learning
Rule-based reasoning, a fundamental type of legal reasoning, enables us to draw conclusions by accurately applying a rule to a set of facts. We explore causal language models as rule-based reasoners, specifically with respect to compositional rules - rules consisting of multiple elements which form a complex logical expression. Reasoning about compositional rules is challenging because it requires multiple reasoning steps, and attending to the logical relationships between elements. We introduce a new prompting method, Chain of Logic, which elicits rule-based reasoning through decomposition (solving elements as independent threads of logic), and recomposition (recombining these sub-answers to resolve the underlying logical expression). This method was inspired by the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) framework, a sequential reasoning approach used by lawyers. We evaluate chain of logic across eight rule-based reasoning tasks involving three distinct compositional rules from the LegalBench benchmark and demonstrate it consistently outperforms other prompting methods, including chain of thought and self-ask, using open-source and commercial language models.