Dual processes theories of memory propose two separate processes: recollection (intentional and deliberate) and an automatic component (effortless). Previous studies have established a strong positive correlation between people’s Judgements of Learning i.e. predictions about their memory performance and the recollection component, but the studies have been inconclusive regarding the link of JOLs with the automatic component. A study by Undorf et. al. (2016) using Process Dissociation Procedure has been able to show a correlation between metamemory and the automatic component of memory using JOLs obtained during the learning phase.. Experiment 1 is a conceptual replication of this study, where we measure the dual processes using a different task and take JOLs at the time of encoding to test the relation between JOLs and the two components of memory. Experiment 2 tests this further by taking the retrospective confidence judgements (RCJ) at the time of retrieval, which is a better predictor of memory performance. Individual correlations between metamemory and the two memory processes across participants are also analyzed. While the correlations obtained through binning JOLs showed similar results to Undorf et al (2016), correlations across subjects using mean JOLs mostly did not show significant correlations. RCJs were better predictors of memory performance than JOLs. In Experiment 2, correlations between RCJs and recollection were significant indicating that metamemory obtained during retrieval perhaps cannot predict automatic influences in memory. 
Keywords: memory; metamemory; metacognition; judgments of learning; retrospective confidence judgment; process dissociation

Metamemory based on retrospective judgments only predict recollection but not automatic influences

This session has no scheduled virtual poster presentation time, but attendees will be able to comment and ask questions about your work/research asynchronously throughout the conference.<br>

**If you are a virtual poster presenter**, you can leave a message in your poster area chat space to advise times (and time zone) that you will be available either in the chat box, or by setting up your own online meeting room (Zoom, etc.).<br>
**If you are an attendee**, please check each poster's chat box and arrange time with presenter.<br>



Virtual Posters

poster

The 45th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society will take place in Sydney, Australia as a modified hybrid conference. Presentations from the main-session room will be live-streamed every day for all events. This will include all invited talks and award sessions. Recordings of all CogSci 2023 sessions will be made available for on-demand viewing after the conference.<br>
The in-person component will be held at the International Convention Centre Sydney at Darling Harbour. The Conference will take place Wednesday July 26th – Saturday July 29th, 2023 (Wednesday, July 26th is the Workshops Day).

Join us!

<br>[**The Program at a Glance can be found here**](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/COgSci-PAAG-V2.pdf)
<br>[**The Detailed Program can be found here**](https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/mswz/)
<br><br>

#### **CogSci 2023 Program Book**
<iframe style="width:700px;height:400px" src="https://online.fliphtml5.com/ebtyf/tzgk/"  seamless="seamless" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" ></iframe>
<br>

CogSci 2023

The 45th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society presents the latest research across cognitive science and highlights the theme of Cognition in Context.

Sanika Patil

1

Presentations

Metamemory based on retrospective judgments only predict recollection but not automatic influences

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES