Presidential Address

Test of Time Awards

We present 1-PAGER the first system that answers a question and retrieves evidence using a single Transformer-based model and decoding process. 1-PAGER incrementally partitions the retrieval corpus using constrained decoding to select a document and answer string, and we show that this is competitive with comparable retrieve-and-read alternatives according to both retrieval and answer accuracy metrics. 1-PAGER also outperforms the equivalent ‘closed-book’ question answering model, by grounding predictions in an evidence corpus. While 1-PAGER is not yet on-par with more expensive systems that read many more documents before generating an answer, we argue that it provides an important step toward attributed generation by folding retrieval into the sequence-to-sequence paradigm that is currently dominant in NLP. We also show that the search paths used to partition the corpus are easy to read and understand, paving a way forward for interpretable neural retrieval.

1-Pager: One Pass Answer Generation and Evidence Retrieval

Large language models capture knowledge and abilities learned from their pre-training data, which is typically limited to text and code. We present approaches for *grounding* these LLMs to carry out tasks that involve visual perception and reasoning. Our methods leverage LLMs' abilities to generate (1) dialogue (2) questions and (3) code, putting these to use in a series of visual dialogue tasks where people interact with models in perceptually-complex settings.

Interacting with LLMs for Grounded Tasks

A desirable trait of an artificial agent acting in the visual world is to continually learn a sequence of language-informed tasks while striking a balance between sufficiently specializing in each task and building a generalized knowledge for transfer. Selective specialization, i.e., a careful selection of model components to specialize in each task, is a strategy to provide control over this trade-off. However, the design of selection strategies requires insights on the role of each model component in learning rather specialized or generalizable representations, which poses a gap in current research. Thus, our aim with this work is to provide an extensive analysis of selection strategies for visually grounded continual language learning. Due to the lack of suitable benchmarks for this purpose, we introduce two novel diagnostic datasets that provide enough control and flexibility for a thorough model analysis. We assess various heuristics for module specialization strategies as well as quantifiable measures for two different types of model architectures. Finally, we design conceptually simple approaches based on our analysis that outperform common continual learning baselines.1 Our results demonstrate the need for further efforts towards better aligning continual learning algorithms with the learning behaviors of individual model parts.

Visually Grounded Continual Language Learning with Selective Specialization

Emotion arcs capture how an individual (or a population) feels over time. They are widely used in industry and research; however, there is little work on evaluating the automatically generated arcs. This is because of the difficulty of establishing the true (gold) emotion arc. Our work, for the first time, systematically and quantitatively evaluates automatically generated emotion arcs. We also compare two common ways of generating emotion arcs: Machine-Learning (ML) models and Lexicon-Only (LexO) methods. By running experiments on 18 diverse datasets in 9 languages, we show that despite being markedly poor at instance level emotion classification, LexO methods are highly accurate at generating emotion arcs when aggregating information from hundreds of instances. We also show, through experiments on six indigenous African languages, as well as Arabic, and Spanish, that automatic translations of English emotion lexicons can be used to generate high-quality emotion arcs in less-resource languages. This opens up avenues for work on emotions in languages from around the world; which is crucial for commerce, public policy, and health research in service of speakers often left behind. Code and resources: https://github.com/dteodore/EmotionArcs

Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in utilizing tools, but their ability is limited by API availability and the instability of implicit reasoning, particularly when both planning and execution are involved. To overcome these limitations, we propose CREATOR, a novel framework that enables LLMs to create their own tools using documentation and code realization. CREATOR disentangles abstract tool creation and concrete decision execution, resulting in improved performance. We evaluate CREATOR on MATH and TabMWP benchmarks, respectively consisting of challenging math competition problems and diverse tabular contents. Remarkably, CREATOR outperforms existing chain-of-thought, program-of-thought, and tool-using baselines. Additionally, we introduce the Creation Challenge dataset, featuring 2K diverse questions, to emphasize the necessity and benefits of LLMs' tool creation ability. Further research demonstrates that leveraging LLMs as tool creators facilitates knowledge transfer, and LLMs exhibit varying levels of tool creation abilities, enabling them to adapt to diverse situations. The tool creation ability revolutionizes the LLM's problem-solving paradigm, driving us closer to the next frontier of artificial intelligence.

CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models

Natural language is an instrument of interaction, where interlocutors produce and comprehend language to relay information to accomplish their intents. Both opportunities and challenges arise from the interactive nature of language. The response of participants to the language they comprehend can form a strong learning signal: did I achieve my intent? In the first part, I will define a simple, and general framework to rapidly learn from interaction feedback, and show how to use this signal to learn to produce natural language instructions. I will then discuss the problem of language-conditioned reinforcement learning, where benchmark development has been hindered because computing rewards requires resolving language semantics. I will describe a new approach to address this challenge.

Natural Language Learning via Interaction

One of the frequent points in the mainstream narrative about large language models is that they have “emergent properties” (sometimes even dangerous enough to be considered existential risk to mankind). However, there is much disagreement about even the very definition of such properties. If they are understood as a kind of generalization beyond training data - as something that a model does without being explicitly trained for it - I argue that we have not in fact established the existence of any such properties, and at the moment we do not even have the methodology for doing so.

A sanity check on emergent properties

Oral Presentations of Contextual Bangla Neural Stemmer: Finding Contextualized Root Word Representations for Bangla Words

Oral Presentation of CNS Model-Paper ID: 68 | VIDEO

Natural language serves as the primary mode of communication when an intelligent agent with a physical presence engages with human beings. While a plethora of research focuses on natural language understanding (NLU), encompassing endeavors such as sentiment analysis, intent prediction, question answering, and summarization, the scope of NLU directed at situations necessitating tangible actions by an embodied agent remains limited. The inherent ambiguity and incompleteness inherent in natural language present challenges for intelligent agents striving to decipher human intention. To tackle this predicament head-on, we introduce a novel system known as \textbf{t}ask and \textbf{a}rgument \textbf{g}rounding for \textbf{E}mbodied agents (\system). At its core, our system employs an inventive neural network model designed to extract a series of tasks from complex task instructions expressed in natural language. Our proposed model adopts an encoder-decoder framework enriched with nested decoding to effectively extract tasks and their corresponding arguments from these intricate instructions. These extracted tasks are then mapped (or grounded) to the robot's established collection of skills, while the arguments find grounding in objects present within the environment. To facilitate the training and evaluation of our system, we have curated a dataset featuring complex instructions. The results of our experiments underscore the prowess of our approach, as it outperforms robust baseline models.

tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructions​

The prevalence and salience of LMs has changed the way many researchers in NLP think about our work, causing many issues for model evaluation. This presentation presents a retrospective of recent past approaches to modeling text, and discusses what has changed, and what the current evaluation challenges are. Next, it discusses common pitfalls that LM-based research falls into, highlighting several fallacies, and suggesting ways to avoid them. Finally, this presentation highlights the importance of meta-evaluation research (the evaluation of our evaluations) as one crucial component to overcoming LM evaluation challenges in the post LM-boom.

Underline digital video library

Presidential Address

Test of Time Awards

1-Pager: One Pass Answer Generation and Evidence Retrieval

Interacting with LLMs for Grounded Tasks

Visually Grounded Continual Language Learning with Selective Specialization

Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysis

CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models

Natural Language Learning via Interaction

A sanity check on emergent properties

Oral Presentation of CNS Model-Paper ID: 68 | VIDEO

tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructions

Evaluation after the LM boom: Frustrations, fallacies andthe future

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Underline digital video library

Presidential Address

Test of Time Awards

1-Pager: One Pass Answer Generation and Evidence Retrieval

Interacting with LLMs for Grounded Tasks

Visually Grounded Continual Language Learning with Selective Specialization

Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysis

CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models

Natural Language Learning via Interaction

A sanity check on emergent properties

Oral Presentation of CNS Model-Paper ID: 68 | VIDEO

tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructions​

Evaluation after the LM boom: Frustrations, fallacies andthe future

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructions