poster
Physiological markers of avian dehydration and perspectives in ecophysiology: assessing the hyperthermia-dehydration tradeoff
During heat exposure, birds face a trade-off between hyperthermia and dehydration. Numerous studies have attempted to predict cooling costs for birds, which are expected to increase with global warming. Although modelling dehydration risk is important, it does have its limitations, and do not replace direct measurement of hydration status. In fact, studies assessing the effects of temperature on the hydration status of wild birds are surprisingly rare. In this article, we discuss the experimental evidence for the hyperthermia–dehydration tradeoff, and the limitations of modelling avian dehydration risk through set thermal limits. In addition, we present a systematic review of physiological markers of dehydration for avian species. We find that plasma osmolarity and plasma concentrations of sodium and chloride are the most reliable markers of dehydration, and seem to scale with dehydration severity. Hematocrit appears to predict dehydration but multiple concerns impede its suitability. Plasma concentrations of uric acid, urea and creatinine may represent adequate markers of dehydration. Alternatively, characteristics of the excreta may represent less-invasive means to assess hydration status.