Canada

Deploying deep learning models in safety-critical applications remains a very challenging task, mandating the provision of assurances for the dependable operation of these models. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods estimate the model’s confidence per prediction, informing decision-making by considering the effect of randomness and model misspecification. Despite the advances of state-of-the-art UQ methods, they are computationally expensive or produce conservative prediction sets/intervals. We introduce MC-CP, a novel hybrid UQ method that combines a new adaptive Monte Carlo (MC) dropout method with conformal prediction (CP). MC-CP adaptively modulates the traditional MC dropout at runtime to save memory and computation resources, enabling predictions to be consumed by CP, yielding robust prediction sets/intervals. Throughout comprehensive experiments, we show that MC-CP delivers significant improvements over comparable UQ methods, like MC dropout, RAPS and CQR, both in classification and regression benchmarks. MC-CP can be easily added to existing models, making its deployment simple. The MC-CP code and replication package is available at https://github.com/team-daniel/MC-CP.

AAAI 2024

Robust Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformalised Monte Carlo Prediction

ssrai: safe ai systems

ssrai: robust ai systems

ssrai: risk quantification

technical paper

We are pleased to announce the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-24), which will be held in Vancouver, British Columbia at the Vancouver Convention Centre – West Building from 20-27 February, 2024.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-24 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.

We expect for AAAI-24 to be an in-person conference – one author of all accepted papers will be expected to present work in person unless there are exceptional circumstances that prevent this.<br><br><br><br>

In order to access the AAAI-24 event page you need to register [here](https://aaai.org/aaai-conference/registration/)

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. 

Although promising, existing defenses against query-based attacks share a common limitation: they offer increased robustness against attacks at the price of a considerable accuracy drop on clean samples. In this work, we show how to efficiently establish, at test-time, a solid tradeoff between robustness and accuracy when mitigating query-based attacks. Given that these attacks necessarily explore low-confidence regions, our insight is that activating dedicated defenses, such as RND (Qin et al., NeuRIPS 2021) and Random Image Transformations (Xie et al., ICLR 2018), only for low-confidence inputs is sufficient to prevent them. Our approach is independent of training and supported by theory. We verify the effectiveness of our approach for various existing defenses by conducting extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Our results confirm that our proposal can indeed enhance these defenses by providing better tradeoffs between robustness and accuracy when compared to state-of-the-art approaches while being completely training-free.

Closing the Gap: Achieving Better Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoffs against Query-Based Attacks

In the domain of real-world agents, the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL) remains challenging due to the necessity for safety constraints. Previously, Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) has predominantly focused on on-policy algorithms. Although these algorithms exhibit a degree of efficacy, their interactivity efficiency in real-world settings is sub-optimal, highlighting the demand for more efficient off-policy methods. However, off-policy CRL algorithms grapple with challenges in precise estimation of the C-function, particularly due to the fluctuations in the constrained Lagrange multiplier. Addressing this gap, our study focuses on the nuances of C-value estimation in off-policy CRL and introduces the Adaptive Ensemble C-learning (AEC) approach to reduce these inaccuracies. Building on state-of-the-art off-policy algorithms, we propose AEC-based CRL algorithms designed for enhanced task optimization. Extensive experiments on nine constrained robotics tasks reveal the superior interaction efficiency and performance of our algorithms in comparison to preceding methods.

Enhancing Off-Policy Constrained Reinforcement Learning through Adaptive Ensemble C Estimation

Counterfactual Explanation (CE) techniques have garnered attention as a means to provide insights to the users engaging with AI systems. While extensively researched in domains such as medical imaging and autonomous vehicles, Graph Counterfactual Explanation (GCE) methods have been comparatively under-explored. GCEs generate a new graph similar to the original one, with a different outcome grounded on the underlying predictive model. Among these GCE techniques, those rooted in generative mechanisms have received relatively limited investigation despite demonstrating impressive accomplishments in other domains, such as artistic styles and natural language modelling. The preference for generative explainers stems from their capacity to generate counterfactual instances during inference, leveraging autonomously acquired perturbations of the input graph. Motivated by the rationales above, our study introduces RSGG-CE, a novel Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations able to produce counterfactual examples from the learned latent space considering a partially ordered generation sequence. Furthermore, we undertake quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare RSGG-CE's performance against SoA generative explainers, highlighting its increased ability to engendering plausible counterfactual candidates.

Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations

Traditional adversarial training, while effective at improving machine learning model robustness, is computationally intensive. Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) addresses this by using a single-step attack to generate adversarial examples more efficiently. Nonetheless, FAT is susceptible to a phenomenon known as catastrophic overfitting, wherein the model's adversarial robustness abruptly collapses to zero during the training phase. To address this challenge, recent studies have suggested adopting adversarial initialization with Fast Gradient Sign Method Adversarial Training (FGSM-AT), which recycles adversarial perturbations from prior epochs by computing gradient momentum. However, our research has uncovered a flaw in this approach. Given that data augmentation is employed during the training phase, the samples in each epoch are not identical. Consequently, the method essentially yields not the adversarial perturbation of a singular sample, but rather the Universal Adversarial Perturbation (UAP) of a sample and its data augmentation. This insight has led us to explore the potential of using UAPs for adversarial initialization within the context of FGSM-AT. We have devised various strategies for adversarial initialization utilizing UAPs, including single, class-based, and feature-based UAPs. Experiments conducted on three distinct datasets demonstrate that our method achieves an improved trade-off among robustness, computational cost, and memory footprint. Code is available at {https://github.com/fzjcdt/fgsm-uap}.

Adversarial Initialization with Universal Adversarial Perturbation: A New Approach to Fast Adversarial Training

This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL), such that the safety constraint violations are bounded at any point during learning. As enforcing safety during training might severely limit the agent’s exploration, we propose here a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration. As the exploration progresses, we update via Bayesian inference Dirichlet-Categorical models of the transition probabilities of the Markov decision process that describes the environment dynamics. We then propose a way to approximate moments of belief about the risk associated to the action selection policy. We demonstrate that this approach can be easily interleaved with RL and we present experimental results to showcase the performance of the overall architecture.

Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis | VIDEO

In robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), it is assumed that the reward and the transition dynamics lie in a given uncertainty set. By targeting maximal return under the most adversarial model from that set, RMDPs address performance sensitivity to misspecified environments. Yet, to preserve computational tractability, the uncertainty set is traditionally independently structured for each state. This so-called rectangularity condition is solely motivated by computational concerns. As a result, it lacks a practical incentive and may lead to overly conservative behavior.
In this work, we study coupled reward RMDPs where the transition kernel is fixed, but the reward function lies within an $\alpha$-radius from a nominal one. We draw a direct connection between this type of non-rectangular reward-RMDPs and applying policy visitation frequency regularization. We introduce a policy-gradient method, and prove its convergence. Numerical experiments illustrate the learned policy's robustness and its less conservative behavior when compared to rectangular uncertainty.

Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as the dominant approach for machine learning on graph-structured data. However, concerns have arisen regarding the vulnerability of GNNs to small adversarial perturbations. Existing defense methods against such perturbations suffer from high time complexity and can negatively impact the model's performance on clean graphs. To address these challenges, this paper introduces NoisyGNNs, a novel defense method that incorporates noise into the underlying model's architecture. We establish a theoretical connection between noise injection and the enhancement of GNN robustness, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. We further conduct extensive empirical evaluations on the node classification task to validate our theoretical findings, focusing on two popular GNNs: the GCN and GIN. The results demonstrate that NoisyGNN achieves superior or comparable defense performance to existing methods while minimizing added time complexity. The NoisyGNN approach is model-agnostic, allowing it to be integrated with different GNN architectures. Successful combinations of our NoisyGNN approach with existing defense techniques demonstrate even further improved adversarial defense results. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Sennadir/NoisyGNN.

A Simple and Yet Fairly Effective Defense for Graph Neural Networks | VIDEO

In supervised learning, automatically assessing the quality of the labels before any learning takes place remains an open research question. In certain particular cases, hypothesis testing procedures have been proposed to assess whether a given instance-label dataset is contaminated with class-conditional label noise, as opposed to uniform label noise. The existing theory builds on the asymptotic properties of the Maximum Likelihood Estimate for parametric logistic regression. However, the parametric assumptions on top of which these approaches are constructed are often too strong and unrealistic in practice. To alleviate this problem, in this paper we propose an alternative path by showing how similar procedures can be followed when the underlying model is a product of Local Maximum Likelihood Estimation that leads to more flexible nonparametric logistic regression models, which in turn are less susceptible to model misspecification. This different view allows for wider applicability of the tests by offering users access to a richer model class. Similarly to existing works, we assume we have access to anchor points which are provided by the users. We introduce the necessary ingredients for the adaptation of the hypothesis tests to the case of nonparametric logistic regression and empirically compare against the parametric approach presenting both synthetic and real-world case studies and discussing the advantages and limitations of the proposed approach.

Hypothesis Testing for Class-Conditional Noise Using Local Maximum Likelihood

Linear temporal logic (LTL) and omega-regular objectives---a superset of LTL---have seen recent use as a way to express non-Markovian objectives in reinforcement learning. We introduce a model-based probably approximately correct (PAC) learning algorithm for omega-regular objectives in Markov decision processes (MDPs). As part of the development of our algorithm, we introduce the epsilon-recurrence time: a measure of the speed at which a policy converges to the satisfaction of the omega-regular objective in the limit. We prove that our algorithm only requires a polynomial number of samples in the relevant parameters, and perform experiments which confirm our theory.

A PAC Learning Algorithm for LTL and Omega-Regular Objectives in MDPs

There has been much recent interest in developing fair clustering algorithms that seek to do justice to the representation of groups defined along sensitive attributes such as race and sex. Within the centroid clustering paradigm, these algorithms are seen to generate clusterings where different groups are disadvantaged within different clusters with respect to their representativity, i.e., distance to centroid. In view of this deficiency, we propose a novel notion of cluster-level centroid fairness that targets the representativity unfairness borne by groups within each cluster, along with a metric to quantify the same. Towards operationalising this notion, we draw on ideas from political philosophy aligned with consideration for the worst-off group to develop Fair-Centroid; a new clustering method that focusses on enhancing the representativity of the worst-off group within each cluster. Our method uses an iterative optimisation paradigm wherein an initial cluster assignment is refined by reassigning objects to clusters such that the worst-off group in each cluster is benefitted. We compare our notion with a related fairness notion and show through extensive empirical evaluations on real-world datasets that our method significantly enhances cluster-level centroid fairness at low impact on cluster coherence.

Robust Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformalised Monte Carlo Prediction

Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Closing the Gap: Achieving Better Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoffs against Query-Based Attacks

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Robust Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformalised Monte Carlo Prediction

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Closing the Gap: Achieving Better Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoffs against Query-Based Attacks

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Downloads