Canada

We examine machine learning models in a setup where individuals have the choice to share optional personal information with a decision-making system, as seen in modern insurance pricing models. Some users consent to their data being used whereas others object and keep their data undisclosed. In this work, we show that the decision not to share data can be considered as information in itself that should be protected to respect users&#39; privacy. This observation raises the overlooked problem of how to ensure that users who protect their personal data do not suffer any disadvantages as a result. To address this problem, we formalize protection requirements for models which only use the information for which active user consent was obtained. This excludes implicit information contained in the decision to share data or not. We offer the first solution to this problem by proposing the notion of Protected User Consent (PUC), which we prove to be loss-optimal under our protection requirement. We observe that privacy and performance are not fundamentally at odds with each other and that it is possible for a decision maker to benefit from additional data while respecting users&#39; consent. To learn PUC-compliant models, we devise a model-agnostic data augmentation strategy with finite sample convergence guarantees. Finally, we analyze the implications of PUC on challenging real datasets, tasks, and models.

AAAI 2024

I Prefer Not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data

missing values

optional features

algorithmic fairness

We examine machine learning models in a setup where individuals have the choice to share optional personal information with a decision-making system, as seen in modern insurance pricing models. Some users consent to their data being used whereas others object and keep their data undisclosed. In this work, we show that the decision not to share data can be considered as information in itself that should be protected to respect users' privacy. This observation raises the overlooked problem of how to ensure that users who protect their personal data do not suffer any disadvantages as a result. To address this problem, we formalize protection requirements for models which only use the information for which active user consent was obtained. This excludes implicit information contained in the decision to share data or not. We offer the first solution to this problem by proposing the notion of Protected User Consent (PUC), which we prove to be loss-optimal under our protection requirement. We observe that privacy and performance are not fundamentally at odds with each other and that it is possible for a decision maker to benefit from additional data while respecting users' consent. To learn PUC-compliant models, we devise a model-agnostic data augmentation strategy with finite sample convergence guarantees. Finally, we analyze the implications of PUC on challenging real datasets, tasks, and models.

technical paper

We are pleased to announce the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-24), which will be held in Vancouver, British Columbia at the Vancouver Convention Centre – West Building from 20-27 February, 2024.

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. AAAI-24 will feature technical paper presentations, special tracks, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, and a range of other activities to be announced.

We expect for AAAI-24 to be an in-person conference – one author of all accepted papers will be expected to present work in person unless there are exceptional circumstances that prevent this.<br><br><br><br>

In order to access the AAAI-24 event page you need to register [here](https://aaai.org/aaai-conference/registration/)

The purpose of the AAAI conference series is to promote research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foster scientific exchange between researchers, practitioners, scientists, students, and engineers across the entirety of AI and its affiliated disciplines. 

Identifying safe areas is a key point to guarantee trust for systems that are based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). To this end, we introduce the AllDNN-Verification problem: given a safety property and a DNN, enumerate the set of all the regions of the property input domain which are safe, i.e., where the property does hold. Due to the #P-hardness of the problem, we propose an efficient approximation method called ε-ProVe. Our approach exploits a controllable underestimation of the output reachable sets obtained via statistical prediction of tolerance limits, and can provide a tight —with provable probabilistic guarantees— lower estimate of the safe areas. Our empirical evaluation on different standard benchmarks shows the scalability and effectiveness of our method, offering valuable insights for this new type of verification of DNNs.

Enumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees

For ensuring the safety of users by protecting the privacy,  the traditional privacy-preserving bandit algorithm aiming to maximize the mean reward has been widely studied in scenarios such as online ride-hailing, advertising recommendations, and personalized healthcare. However, classical bandit learning is irresponsible in such practical applications as they fail to account for risks in online decision-making and ignore external system information. This paper firstly proposes  privacy protected mean-volatility utility as the objective of bandit learning and proves its responsibility, because it aims at achieving the maximum probability of utility by considering the risk.  Theoretically, our proposed responsible bandit learning is expected to achieve the fastest rate of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon\sqrt{n}})$ and generates more statistical power than classical normality-based test. Finally, simulation studies provide supporting evidence for the theoretical results and demonstrate stronger performance when using stricter privacy budgets.

Responsible Bandit Learning via Privacy-Protected Mean-Volatility Utility | VIDEO

Toxic content detection is crucial for online services to remove inappropriate content that violates community standards. To automate the detection process, prior works have proposed varieties of machine learning (ML) approaches to train Language Models (LMs) for toxic content detection. However, both their accuracy and transferability across datasets are limited. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in toxic content detection due to their superior zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning ability as well as broad transferability on ML tasks.
However, efficiently designing prompts for LLMs remains challenging. Moreover, the high run-time cost of LLMs may hinder their deployments in production. To address these challenges, in this work, we propose BD-LLM, a novel and efficient approach to bootstrapping and distilling LLMs for toxic content detection. 
Specifically, we design a novel prompting method named Decision-Tree-of-Thought (DToT) to bootstrap LLMs' detection performance and extract high-quality rationales. DToT can automatically select more fine-grained context to re-prompt LLMs when their responses lack confidence. Additionally, we use the rationales extracted via DToT to fine-tune student LMs. Our experimental results on various datasets demonstrate that DToT can improve the accuracy of LLMs by up to 4.6%. Furthermore, student LMs fine-tuned with rationales extracted via DToT outperform baselines on all datasets with up to 16.9% accuracy improvement, while being more than 60x smaller than conventional LLMs. Finally, we observe that student LMs fine-tuned with rationales exhibit better cross-dataset transferability.

Efficient Toxic Content Detection by Bootstrapping and Distilling Large Language Models

While explainability is a desirable characteristic of increasingly complex black-box models, modern explanation methods have been shown to be inconsistent and contradictory. The semantics of explanations is not always fully understood - to what extent do explanations "explain" a decision and to what extent do they merely advocate for a decision? Can we help humans gain insights from explanations accompanying correct predictions and not over-rely on incorrect predictions advocated for by explanations? With this perspective in mind, we introduce the notion of dissenting explanations: conflicting predictions with accompanying explanations. We first explore the advantage of dissenting explanations in the setting of model multiplicity, where multiple models with similar performance may have different predictions. In such cases, providing dissenting explanations could be done by invoking the explanations of disagreeing models. Through a pilot study, we demonstrate that dissenting explanations reduce overreliance on model predictions, without reducing overall accuracy. Motivated by the utility of dissenting explanations we present both global and local methods for their generation.

Dissenting Explanations: Leveraging Disagreement to Reduce Model Overreliance

Despite the increasing popularity of graph neural networks (GNNs), the security risks associated with their deployment have not been well explored. Existing works follow the standard adversarial attacks to maximize cross-entropy loss within an L-infinity  norm bound. We analyze the robustness of GNNs against node injection attacks (NIAs) in black-box settings by allowing new nodes to be injected and attacked. In this work, we propose to design stronger and transferable NIAs. First, we propose margin aware attack (MAA) that uses a maximum margin loss to generate NIAs. We then propose a novel margin and direction aware attack (MDA) that diversifies the initial directions of MAA attack by minimizing the cosine similarity of the injected nodes with respect to their respective random initialization in addition to the maximization of max-margin loss. This makes the NIAs stronger. We further observe that using L2 norm of gradients in the attack step leads to an enhanced diversity amongst the node features, thereby further enhancing the strength of the attack. We incorporate transferability in NIAs by perturbing the surrogate model before generating the attack. An analysis of eigen spectrum density of the hessian of the loss emphasizes that perturbing the weights of the surrogate model improves the transferability. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed resilient node injection attack (R-NIA) consistently outperform PGD by margins about 7-15\% on both large and small graph datasets. R-NIA is significantly stronger and transferable than existing NIAs on graph robustness benchmarks.

Stronger and Transferable Node Injection Attacks

While Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning (GCRL) has gained attention, its algorithmic robustness against adversarial perturbations remains unexplored. The attacks and robust representation training methods that are designed for traditional RL become less effective when applied to GCRL. To address this challenge, we first propose the Semi-Contrastive Representation attack, a novel approach inspired by the adversarial contrastive attack. Unlike existing attacks in RL, it only necessitates information from the policy function and can be seamlessly implemented during deployment. Then, to mitigate the vulnerability of existing GCRL algorithms, we introduce Adversarial Representation Tactics, which combines Semi-Contrastive Adversarial Augmentation with Sensitivity-Aware Regularizer to improve the adversarial robustness of the underlying RL agent against various types of perturbations. Extensive experiments validate the superior performance of our attack and defence methods across multiple state-of-the-art GCRL algorithms. Our tool ReRoGCRL is available at https://github.com/TrustAI/ReRoGCRL.

Representation-Based Robustness in Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

Differentially private (DP) synthetic datasets have been receiving significant attention from academia, industry, and government. However, little is known about how to perform statistical inference using DP synthetic datasets. Naive approaches that do not take into account the induced uncertainty due to the DP mechanism will result in biased estimators and invalid inferences. In this paper, we present a class of maximum likelihood estimator (MLE)-based easy-to-implement bias-corrected DP estimators with valid asymptotic confidence intervals (CI) for parameters in regression settings, by establishing the connection between additive DP mechanisms and measurement error models. Our simulation shows that our estimator has comparable performance to the widely used sufficient statistic perturbation (SSP) algorithm in some scenarios but with the advantage of releasing a synthetic dataset and obtaining statistically valid asymptotic CIs, which can achieve better coverage when compared to the naive CIs obtained by ignoring the DP mechanism.

Analysis of Differentially Private Synthetic Data: A Measurement Error Approach

Quantization replaces floating point arithmetic with integer arithmetic in deep neural network models, providing more efficient on-device inference with less power and memory. In this work, we propose a framework for formally verifying the properties of quantized neural networks. Our baseline technique is based on integer linear programming which guarantees both soundness and completeness. We then show how efficiency can be improved by utilizing gradient-based heuristic search methods and also bound-propagation techniques. We evaluate our approach on perception networks quantized with PyTorch. Our results show that we can verify quantized networks with better scalability and efficiency than the previous state of the art.

Towards Efficient Verification of Quantized Neural Networks | VIDEO

Continuous machine learning pipelines are common in industrial settings where models are periodically trained on data streams. Unfortunately, concept drifts may occur in data streams where the joint distribution of the data X and label y, P(X, y), changes over time and possibly degrade model accuracy. Existing concept drift adaptation approaches mostly focus on updating the model to the new data possibly using ensemble techniques of previous models and tend to discard the drifted historical data. However, we contend that explicitly utilizing the drifted data together leads to much better model accuracy and propose Quilt, a data-centric framework for identifying and selecting data segments that maximize model accuracy. To address the potential downside of efficiency, Quilt extends existing data subset selection techniques, which can be used to reduce the training data without compromising model accuracy. These techniques cannot be used as is because they only assume virtual drifts where the posterior probabilities P(y|X) are assumed not to change. In contrast, a key challenge in our setup is to also discard undesirable data segments with concept drifts. Quilt thus discards drifted data segments and selects data segment subsets holistically for accurate and efficient model training. The two operations use gradient-based scores, which have little computation overhead. In our experiments, we show that Quilt outperforms state-of-the-art drift adaptation and data selection baselines on synthetic and real datasets.

Quilt: Robust Data Segment Selection against Concept Drifts

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial to safety-critical machine learning applications and has been extensively studied.
While recent studies have predominantly focused on classifier-based methods, research on deep generative model (DGM)-based methods have lagged relatively.
This disparity may be attributed to a perplexing phenomenon: DGMs often assign higher likelihoods to unknown OOD inputs than to their known training data.
This paper focuses on explaining the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon.
We propose a hypothesis that less complex images concentrate in high-density regions in the latent space, resulting in a higher likelihood assignment in the Normalizing Flow (NF).
We experimentally demonstrate its validity for five NF architectures, concluding that their likelihood is untrustworthy.
Additionally, we show that this problem can be alleviated by treating image complexity as an independent variable.
Finally, we provide evidence of the potential applicability of our hypothesis in another DGM, PixelCNN++.

Content not yet available

I Prefer Not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data

Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Enumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Content not yet available

I Prefer Not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from AAAI 2024

Enumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Downloads