United States

**Scoring is only possible in the semifinals hall**

**Abstract:**



AMA Research Challenge 2023

Grow502: a Pop-up Clinic to Tackle Health Disparities in the Houseless Population

poster

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research** event featuring research from nearly 700 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates.

Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event.
 


[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/3e33a8c754cc49610b30950617d813e7.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/sessions?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/551404d429c4e274f9a54cbdd7081918.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/posters?searchGroup=all)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/677d92f566b880cebd36905fc738fc10.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/lounge)
 
[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/c7392833c7261c3874c5b43fa2f4df19.png)](https://underline.io/events/434/help-desk)
 

#### Event Details

The 2023 American Medical Association Research Challenge includes a poster symposium hall and a semifinals hall with the top scored research. **Log in at any time throughout the event to:**

* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with participants** and provide feedback to help advance their research
* **Attend education sessions** with physician experts on key research topics

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA will announce the top five finalists who will advance to the AMA Research Challenge finals, present their research to an elite panel of judges, and compete to win a $10,000 grand prize sponsored by Laurel Road. 

### Grand Prize Sponsor

AMA would like to thank Laurel Road for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road is not involved in the judging or scoring process to select the winner. The winner will be announced on February 4, 2024 during the AMA Research Challenge finals. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road. See the AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions.

![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)

**There is no registration fee for this event! **

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals.

**Please use this link [here](https://www.ama-assn.org/about/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free.**

Registration Is Required

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters, score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity) and attend education sessions with experienced physicians to learn tips to advance your research and career. 

Background
Over 100 bills have been introduced in the United States 2023 legislative session that restrict access to care for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals. Passage of these bills by individual states may prompt medical students to seek residency training in other states, exacerbating the healthcare disparities and barriers to care that already exist for TGD individuals. This study assesses medical students’ perspectives on legislation prohibiting gender transition procedures (GTP) and how this affects where medical students apply to residency programs.

Methods
We analyzed responses from medical students at a Midwest institution. Data examined includes demographics, self-reported knowledge of GTP legislation, impact on residency applications and future practice, and agreement with proposed legislation. Respondents were asked to share factors influencing their feelings about applying for residency in states that restrict GTP, as well as considerations informing their position about regulations. Responses were coded for recurring themes and analyzed.

Results
80 medical students participated, and 39 responded to both free response questions. 36.8% report GTP legislation is important when considering where to apply for residency. 60.5% think this will impact how they practice medicine in the future, regardless of specialty. 57.3% are against restricting GTP for minors, and 82.7% for adults. Factors influencing residency applications fell into five themes: LGBTQ+ safety (38.5%), government interference (33.3%), education/training (33.3%), neutral (20.5%), and against GTP (15.4%). Four themes emerged regarding factors informing position on GTP: best medical practices (71.8%), minors’ capacity to consent (30.8%), government interference (30.8%), and a need for more data (7.7%).

Conclusion
The majority of medical students were against restriction of GTP, and over one-third felt it was an important consideration when applying to residency programs, suggesting that legislation prohibiting GTP may drive training physicians to other states. Responses also highlighted misconceptions and knowledge gaps about GTP, including rates and reasons for detransitioning, minors’ capacity to consent, and long-term risks and benefits of gender affirming care, which may improve with additional training during undergraduate medical education.

Medical students’ perspectives on transgender care legislation and its impact on medical residency applications.

Background
Despite the availability of effective preventative measures, women in rural communities of Louisiana face health disparities, specifically regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Along with suboptimal vaccination rates and cervical cancer screening, these disparities are further exacerbated by a lack of awareness and access to healthcare services. To effectively promote equity for women in rural Louisiana about HPV, understanding their needs is essential for developing appropriate strategies to eliminate the stigma surrounding reproductive health and decrease these health disparities. Therefore, this study aims to identify the risk factors contributing to health disparities related to HPV among women residing in rural areas of Louisiana.
Methods
This cross-sectional study is conducted in a Mobile Unit (MU) that travels to remote North Louisiana areas. Two hundred total participants are estimated for this study, with 123 responses providing preliminary results. The inclusion criteria are English-speaking women aged 25 – 64 without a total hysterectomy and cervical cancer history. With written informed consent and HIPAA authorization, participants responded to a questionnaire. HPV screening was offered and collected by the MU Nurse (NP).
Results
Based on preliminary results, the average age of participants was 54.31 years old. Most participants were African Americans (55.1%). Fifty-two percent had completed high school, 32.8% were married, 37.1% worked full-time, and 80.8% had low income. Regarding cancer history, 64.8% had a family history of cancer. Among them, 52% had a parent with cancer, while 35.8% had a grandparent with cancer. Eight percent had cancer, and 11% had been diagnosed with HPV. Regarding knowledge about HPV, 30% had never heard of it before our study. 46% did not know that HPV is sexually transmitted, 68.8% were unaware HPV causes genital warts, 33.6% did not know HPV can cause cervical cancer, and 47.6% were unaware that an HPV vaccine is available. Additionally, almost 91% of participants believed they were not at risk of HPV infection.
Conclusion
To achieve health equity for women in rural areas of Louisiana about HPV, we must focus on targeted interventions that address the specific challenges they encounter. With preliminary results showing most participants not knowing about HPV or its risk factors, further efforts should be prioritized to improve access to healthcare services, improve education and awareness, and foster community engagement. Understanding these disparities will allow us to create a future where women have equal access to healthcare regardless of where they live.

Bridging the Gap: Health Equity and HPV Among Women in Rural Areas of Louisiana

Analysis of Trauma Protocols & Bias in Toxicology Screening of Patients in Motor Vehicle Accidents

Background
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) individuals face higher levels of stress than the general population in the form of minority stress, defined as discriminatory, stigmatizing, and victimizing experiences. Minority stress has been posited as a cause for LGBTQ individuals to smoke as a coping mechanism, leading to higher than average rates of smoking in this population. The Deep South states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina represent an area with both high levels of minority stress and smoking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to elucidate how minority stress influences smoking among LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South, using a mixed methods approach.

Methods
A one-time, cross-sectional online survey was administered to 1,296 LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South. Survey measurements included previously validated measures of minority stress (prejudice events, perceived stigma, and internalized queerphobia), mental health, social support, smoking, quitting, LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ norms, self-efficacy, and smoking outcome variables (stage of change and nicotine dependence level). Multiple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between minority stress variables and smoking outcome variables. To expound on how minority stress affects mental health and subsequent stage of change, 15 individual, semi-structured online interviews were conducted with LGBTQ smokers in the Deep South. Interview topics spanned across 5 domains: LGBTQ identity, smoking/quitting, minority stress, mental health, and social support.

Results
Survey findings showed that after adjusting for covariates, increased levels of internalized queerphobia were significantly associated with increased nicotine dependence level, and decreased levels of perceived stigma were associated with further stage of change. Six themes emerged across interviews: struggles with LGBTQ identity, coping with minority stress, reasons for smoking, desire to quit smoking, and barriers to quitting smoking.

Conclusion
This study elucidates how increased levels of minority stress are associated with poorer smoking outcomes among LGBTQ individuals in the Deep South. Findings will help guide future smoking prevention and cessation programs for LGBTQ smokers. Addressing minority stress in future targeted smoking interventions has the potential to reducing smoking disparities in LGBTQ populations.

Minority Stress among LGBTQ Smokers in the Deep South: A Mixed Methods Study

Background:
Historical redlining, a discriminatory practice that denied mortgage loans to people of color based on perceived risk, has had lasting effects on communities. These redlined areas, marked as high-risk on maps, continue to face health disparities. This study investigates the relationship between redlining and all-cause mortality rates in Austin, Texas.


90 Years Later: How Historical Redlining Predicts All-Cause Mortality in Austin, Texas

Background
Louisiana's Hispanic/Latinx population is a diverse community that has experienced significant growth in recent years. Unfortunately, COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic minority groups, including Hispanics/Latinx, who often face disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. This study aims to investigate the impact and potential disparities of COVID-19 infection among the Hispanic/Latinx community in Northwest Louisiana.

Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. A total of 242 participants were recruited and asked to complete a structured questionnaire. Eligible participants included individuals above 18 years old who identified as Hispanic or Latinx and resided in Northwest Louisiana. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 28 with a statistical significance level set at p < 0.05. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize and compare the characteristics of the overall sample, while Pearson’s Chi-squared tests were used to identify risk factors.

Results
The average age of the participants was 42.2 years, 64.7% were female, 56.6% were born in Mexico, 37.7% had attained high school education, 54.1% did not speak English, 61.3% were married, and 51.1% were below the poverty level. Approximately 80% of the study participants had access to COVID-19 testing, with 44.3% receiving testing in a clinical or hospital setting. Among the study participants, 53.6% had been infected with COVID-19. Of those infected, more than half (50.4%) did not receive medical care from a clinic or hospital. Additionally, 63.9% personally knew someone who had suffered severe illness due to COVID-19, and 68% expressed concern about contracting the virus. Factors associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection included being female, having limited English proficiency, living with 3 or more people, obesity, and asthma.

Conclusion
This cross-sectional survey offers insights into the impact and disparities experienced by the Hispanic/Latinx population in Northwest Louisiana during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings can aid in implementing prevention measures, resource allocation, and targeted interventions to reduce the risk of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases among minority communities, particularly Hispanics/Latinx.

Disparities and risk factors of COVID-19 infection among Hispanic/Latinx in northwest Louisiana: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background:
Firearm violence is increasingly prevalent in the United States. As such, the number of people living with retained bullet fragments (RBFs) is rising. Lead toxicity is a rare, but known complication of living with an RBF. Lead is a teratogen and fetal exposure to lead has been linked to a variety of congenital abnormalities and cognitive development impairment. Little is known about the risk of maternal-fetal lead toxicity from RBFs. The purpose of this dual systematic review is to investigate the impact that RBFs may have on pregnant patients and their fetuses.
Methods:
Two systematic reviews were conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, using
PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase: one explored the relationship between lead poisoning and retained bullet fragments/foreign bodies, and the second examined the relationship between prenatal lead exposure and fetal/child development. The quality of each included study was assessed on a scale of 0 to 5.
Results:
Of the 494 search results of the first review, only 5 (average quality: 4.2) explored the relationship between retained bullet fragments and blood lead levels, all of which demonstrated a strong association. Of the 753 search results of the second review, 11 (average quality of 3.91) examined the relationship between elevated maternal BLL and fetal development, and all highlighted that elevated maternal BLL is associated with neurobehavioral, cognitive, and cardiovascular fetal development.
Conclusions:
Retained bullet fragments may be a risk factor for lead toxicity in pregnant people with the potential for detrimental effects on the pregnancy and fetus. These patients should be educated about the risk and screened for lead levels during pregnancy. To further improve the health outcomes of this subpopulation and to determine the most appropriate treatment options, more research is needed.

Considering Lead Levels in Pregnancy-Capable People with Retained Bullet Fragments

Background: As diversity continues to flourish in the United States (US), more patients encountered by physicians primarily speak languages other than English. 25.5 million people in the US disclosed they were Limited English Proficient (LEP). LEP patients are known to be marginalized in terms of receiving adequate health care and undergo less preventative care than other individuals of the same ethnicity that are proficient in English. 

Objective: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of breast and cervical cancer screening rates between women with and without difficulty communicating. 

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult women using the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. The rates of breast and cervical cancer screening between women who indicated they had “difficulty communicating” to women who did not were compared. The US Preventive Screening Task Force guidelines were used. Demographic and behavioral variables were analyzed in relation to reported breast and cervical cancer screening. SAS v9.4 was used to analyze the data in a manner that accounts for the complex sample survey design. Bivariate comparisons were performed using Chi-square test, all significance tests were two-sided, p-value < .05 for significance. This study was approved by UND IRB. 

Results: Of the estimated 50 million (unweighted n=6,851) respondents, 4.2% of women reported having difficulty communicating. Women who reported having difficulty communicating were significantly less likely to have received a mammogram within the last 2 years than women who reported no difficulty communicating (p=.015). Similarly, women who reported having difficulty communicating were significantly less likely to have ever had cervical cancer screening (p=.000), to have the last visit as wellness visit (p=.014), and to report poor health (p=.000) than women who reported no difficulty communicating. There was no association between being a US citizen, duration in the US, or birth in the US and difficulty communicating. 

Conclusion: Women with difficulty communicating were less likely to report mammography and cervical cancer screening compared to those with no difficulty communicating. Physicians should spend longer visits with women who have difficulty communicating to enhance preventive cancer screenings and should encourage yearly wellness visits.

Association Between Difficulty Communicating and Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening

Background
Nearly 38.3 million people are food-insecure nationwide. Food insecurity has been associated with diabetes, hypertension, obesity, arthritis, asthma, and decreased mental health. Despite food insecurity, nearly 35% of all grown food goes unsold or unconsumed, equating to around 130 billion meals and up to $285 billion in annual losses. Redistribution programs can alleviate hunger and provide tax benefits to donors. This study sought to investigate the challenges and successes of Brown County, Wisconsin food sectors regarding food waste, redistribution, and salvaging. Educational resources were provided to interested donors.

Methods
Electronic surveys were distributed via email or social media to 479 potential donors, including K-12 schools, colleges, restaurants, and more. Data was collected and analyzed via Qualtrics.

Results
Results (n=31) showed that although most donors expressed food sustainability concerns, a large number have no or low familiarity with food redistribution and salvaging. Further, greater than 50% of donors do have reduction efforts in place; however, only 40% have efforts specific to redistribution. On average, 5.84% of inventory goes unused each month; prepared foods comprise 50.29% of disposed foods, followed by baked goods and fresh produce each at ~15%. Finally, only 23% and 35% of potential donors expressed knowledge of tax benefits and legal protections, respectively.

Conclusion
Although statistical significance was not attained, this study demonstrated great potential for donors to alter food practices, providing donations to those in need. Additionally, there are significant opportunities for education on redistribution logistics and benefits. Future directions include outreach to additional donors, dissemination of information on tax advantages and legal protections, and small-scale pilot studies.

Food Salvaging and Redistribution in Brown County, Wisconsin

Over 40% of U.S. adults disclosed delaying both urgent and routine medical care during the pandemic due to COVID-19 concerns. We aimed to examine impacts of delays in care through the development of new chronic conditions since the beginning of the pandemic. For this cohort of older adults who lived through the COVID-19 pandemic, prevalence of all chronic conditions rose in age-stratified analyses, indicating worsening population health. However, delays in medical care during the pandemic were not associated with chronic condition development. Delays in care may have been compensated for by telehealth, medication delivery, and other services specific to the pandemic.

Premium content

Grow502: a Pop-up Clinic to Tackle Health Disparities in the Houseless Population

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2023

Medical students’ perspectives on transgender care legislation and its impact on medical residency applications.

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES