Lecture image placeholder

Premium content

Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

Monthly subscription - $9.99Pay per view - $4.99Access through your institutionLogin with Underline account
Need help?
Contact us
Lecture placeholder background
VIDEO DOI: https://doi.org/10.48448/ape7-ee35

technical paper

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

November 18, 2021

Baltimore, United States

Fusions and Fissions in Kinship and Capital in Joint Migrant Families in Rural Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.


labor and work



What makes domination and inequality persist over time? New interventions in social reproduction theory (Bhattacharya 2017; Gimenez 2018; Ferguson 2020; Vogel 2013) combine the analytic insights of Marxism and feminism in laying bare the social relations and interdependencies that sustain the continued accumulation of surplus value. They follow in the footsteps of economic anthropologists who have long advocated for the re-centering of social reproduction in the analysis of concrete fieldsites and occurrences (Collier & Yanagisako 1987; Harris &Young 1981; Narotzky 1997; Smith 1999; 2018). A social reproduction approach looks at the processes and activities involved in securing the continuity of a given society. With particular interest in capitalist societies, it identifies the universal dependence on the market for the reproduction of human life as a source of coercion and domination. It also refocuses attention on nonmarket domains that are made invisible by a too-narrow focus on market relations, even as they make these relations possible. Although the traditional focus of social reproduction theory is on the unwaged, feminized domestic labor that Marx had neglected, it does not assume the home as the singular site of reproductive labor, or the housewife as its sole performer. Rather, social reproduction theory traces diverse forms of social oppression in the reproduction of capitalism, including migrant labor and varieties of public or commodified childcare, healthcare and eldercare. In a related but distinct sense, “social reproduction” also refers to the political and ideological mechanisms by which group privileges and particular power structures are reproduced as part and parcel of societal reproduction (Althusser 2014; Bourdieu 1977). Finally, the Marxist anthropology of the 1970s and 80s (Godelier 1977; Meillassoux 1981; Ong 1988; Taussig 1980) presents many congruent lessons on the persistence of non-capitalist social forms within contemporary societies. Our panel aims to tie these strands together, making the case for ethnography’s potential to enrich the theoretical field by exploring empirical intersections that shed light on the concealed forces sustaining domination and inequality. With fieldsites spanning from China through Myanmar, Malaysia and Pakistan to Israel and Germany, and zeroing in on the practices of parenting, schooling, colonization, migration, real estate dealing, industrial production, family farming and retail sales, we hope to demonstrate the contribution of economic anthropology in general, and social reproduction theory specifically, to understanding the dynamics underlying and linking painfully familiar phenomena.


Transcript English (automatic)

Next from AAA Annual Meeting 2021

Schools as drivers of capitalist accumulation. Conditional state-financed social reproduction in Shenzhen.
technical paper

Schools as drivers of capitalist accumulation. Conditional state-financed social reproduction in Shenzhen.

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

Anne-Christine Trémon

18 November 2021

Similar lecture

Social Reproduction: Theory and Ethnography
technical paper

Social Reproduction: Theory and Ethnography

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

18 November 2021

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)


  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved