VIDEO DOI: https://doi.org/10.48448/4jtb-8k50

technical paper

PEERE

September 30, 2020

Live on Underline

Who reviews for predatory and legitimate journals? A study on reviewer characteristics

Please log in to leave a comment

Downloads

SlidesTranscript English (automatic)

Next from PEERE

Gender bias in granting awards: cum laude for PhD theses
technical paper

Gender bias in granting awards: cum laude for PhD theses

PEERE

Charlie Mom
Charlie Mom and 2 other authors

30 September 2020

Similar lecture

Peer Review Improves Manuscripts of Moderate Initial Quality. A Study on Ten Journals from the Royal Society (2006-2017)
technical paper

Peer Review Improves Manuscripts of Moderate Initial Quality. A Study on Ten Journals from the Royal Society (2006-2017)

PEERE

+2Francisco GrimaldoFederico Bianchi
Federico Bianchi and 4 other authors

30 September 2020

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved