United States

ChartDiff is a dataset and benchmark for cross-chart comparative summarization. It contains 8,541 chart pairs with high-quality natural-language comparison annotations. The charts cover six chart types: line, bar, horizontal bar, multi-series line, multi-series bar, and pie. The rendering uses Matplotlib, Plotly, and Plotnine. The data sources include Macrotrends, Yahoo Finance, and Visual Crossing. The annotation pipeline is annotate-judge-verify. The benchmark evaluates general-purpose VLMs, chart-specialized models, and pipeline-based methods.

ACL 2026

ChartDiff: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Comprehending Pairs of Charts

vision-language models

chart understanding

benchmark

# Welcome everyone to ACL 2022!

The 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics is taking place May 22-27, 2022 as a hybrid event, in Dublin and online. We are happy to welcome all of you to this anniversary edition with an almost 50-50 in-person and virtual participation. 
The main conference program features oral presentations, in-person and virtual posters and demo sessions, a plenary session for our best paper presentations and awards, three amazing keynote events and two new initiatives of invited talks: Spotlight Talks for Young Rising Stars (STIRS) and The Next Big Idea Talks. Posters (including Findings of ACL 2022) and demos are grouped by areas for both the in-person and the virtual sessions. For the virtual component, the talks will be on Zoom and the posters and the demos will be in GatherTown. The Student Research Workshop will have an oral session and a poster session as part of Poster Session 1. The program also features eight Tutorials and 28 Workshops. 

 
We wish you a wonderful conference! 
[**The ACL 2022 Organizing Committee**](https://www.2022.aclweb.org/organisers)
 
[**Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_BUCMfhMVrjG9E2e71aHdHeE28KSje0l/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Mini Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlBKl0wzmlVF1oCeMQl3BahLd9nLP5Ce/view?usp=sharing) 
[**Posters and Demo guides**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UucMAoCNncIOaH1rMMDa0owuG9qgvJTG/view?usp=sharing)

ACL 2022

The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing (NLP). 

workshop paper

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

The precolonial and early colonial Mixtec codices describe the history and stories of the region in a semasiographic medium that is full of symbolic representations and meant to be narrated. Recently, the community has investigated hierarchical representation of related media, including Aztec codices and Mayan hieroglyphic script, in a step towards symbolic machine interpretation of these historic Mesoamerican artifacts. In this work, we propose formal symbolic machine interpretation of XML encodings representing facsimile images from the Mixtec Codex Zouche-Nuttall. We demonstrate the efficacy of symbolic machine interpretation from XML step-by-step, showing how our parser and interpreter process text capturing a scene from the Mixtec Codex Zouche-Nuttall. We hope our contribution and the example we provide motivate collaboration among the archaeological, historical, linguistic, and natural language processing research communities to apply machine interpretation to Mixtec codices and similar manuscripts.

Formal Machine Interpretation for the Semasiographic Mixtec Codices of Precolonial and Early Colonial Mesoamerica

One of the expected abilities of vision-language models (VLMs) is spatial reasoning ability based on a given text and image. To evaluate the spatial reasoning abilities of VLMs, we focus on the use of spatial deictic expressions, which are defined as spatial expressions whose referent is determined by their situational context, such as this and that. To handle spatial deictic expressions, VLMs must jointly reason over language and visual space, grounding context-dependent references in the image's spatial structure. In addition, selecting appropriate spatial deictic expressions across languages requires VLMs to understand the language-specific spatial distinctions encoded by these expressions. In this paper, we develop a benchmark to evaluate the multilingual ability of VLMs to use spatial deictic expressions in four languages. Our experiments using this benchmark reveal that the tested models use demonstratives in a manner different from that of humans, particularly in selecting the appropriate demonstratives based on the distance from the object.

Evaluation of Multilingual Ability to Use Spatial Deictic Expressions in Vision-Language Models

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in semantic visual reasoning, yet their capacity for fine-grained, low-level perception remains critically under-evaluated. This perceptual fragility limits their reliability in noisy, real-world environments where visual signals are degraded. Furthermore, existing benchmarks often entangle visual perception with language priors, masking these underlying deficits. To address this, we introduce the \textbf{FAint numeric Detection Evaluation (FADE)} dataset, a novel evaluation suite designed to probe the limits of zero-shot Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in frontier MLLMs. By embedding synthetic, strictly numerical sequences over cluttered natural backgrounds at varying levels of transparency ($\alpha$), FADE explicitly disentangles pure visual perception from semantic predictability. We evaluate state-of-the-art models including Gemini 3.0, Claude 4.5 Sonnet, and Gemma 3 against a specialized UNet segmentation baseline. Our results reveal a striking limitation in frontier architectures: while they achieve near-perfect transcription at high visibility, their performance collapses under high transparency. Conversely, the UNet pipeline maintains robust spatial grounding, significantly outperforming generalist models at the lowest visibility thresholds. FADE provides a reproducible dataset to expose and diagnose the perceptual breakage points of modern multimodal systems.

FADE: Probing the Limits of VLMs on fine-grained OCR

We propose Question-Guided Sparse Attention (QGSA), a lightweight plug-and-play module that reduces visual redundancy in VQA by dynamically selecting only question-relevant image patches before cross-attention. Using a Gumbel-Softmax differentiable selector and a self-supervised grounding loss requiring no bounding-box annotations, QGSA reduces cross-attention FLOPs by 91–99% across standard resolutions while preserving exact accuracy on VQA-RAD, A-OKVQA, and RefCOCO. On SmolVLM-256M, it selects ~17 of 576 patches (34× token compression) and achieves a 31× relative improvement in grounding IoU over random selection. Wall-clock parity with the dense baseline is reached at 336px, with 76.2× theoretical speedup at 576px. These results validate the feasibility of question-conditioned sparse attention as a foundation for efficient inference in larger vision-language models.

Efficient Visual Grounding in VQA via Question-Guided Sparse Attention

Mapping linguistic to visual representations is a central objective in vision-language model (VLM) development. Consequently, current VLM benchmarks and training objectives predominantly optimize for literal, descriptive correspondence between modalities. However, in real-world multimedia contexts, text and images are rarely strictly redundant; they are often loosely coupled, interacting at higher narrative levels. To capture this dynamic, we introduce Visual Narrative Freedom (VNF): the degree to which a generative system can produce multiple plausible visual realizations from an underdetermined textual input. In this paper, we systematically evaluate text-to-image (T2I) generation across a continuum of linguistic constraints, conditioning models on visual descriptions, captions, and full news articles. Using perceptual, structural, and semantic metrics, we first demonstrate that as textual constraints loosen (and VNF increases), T2I models produce images that are significantly more diverse from ground-truth reference photographs. Human evaluation further reveals that providing generation models with greater visual narrative freedom significantly increases the likelihood that their outputs are preferred over authentic news photographs, despite the known stylistic limitations of AI imagery. Ultimately, these findings suggest that the creation of persuasive multimodal misinformation is more imminent than evaluations of T2I systems based solely on text descriptions may indicate. This highlights the need for VLM evaluation frameworks that better capture the underdetermined nature of real-world image-text alignment.

Characterizing Visual Narrative Freedom under Loose Image–Text Alignment

With 1.5 billion people speaking over 120 major languages, India exemplifies the challenges of multilingual AI evaluation. Current multilingual VLM benchmarks suffer from unverified auto-translations, narrow task coverage, small sample sizes, and lack of culturally grounded content. We present HinTel-AlignBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework and benchmark for Hindi and Telugu vision-language models with English-aligned samples. Our framework combines semi-automated translation with human verification to generate 4k QA pairs per language across five domains: adapted English datasets (VQAv2, RealWorldQA, CLEVR-Math) and native Indic sets (JEE for STEM, VAANI for cultural grounding). Evaluation of state-of-the-art open and closed-source VLMs reveals consistent performance regression from English to Indic languages, with average drops of 8.3 points for Hindi and 5.5 points for Telugu across four of five tasks. We identify key failure modes and establish reproducible baselines for multilingual multimodal evaluation.

Systematic Performance Degradation in Indic Vision-Language Models: Evidence from Hindi and Telugu

Text-to-image diffusion models learn a mapping from natural language to visual structure, but how robust is this mapping to perturbation? We use personalization—fine-tuning a model to learn a new face, object, or style—as a controlled stress test to probe the fragility of learned vision-language alignment. We find that fine-tuning for one concept systematically shifts the model’s ability to faithfully render unrelated concepts, and that this disruption follows structured, predictable patterns. To measure this fragility, we construct Concept Entanglement Maps: per-prompt, per-model disruption matrices that reveal which concepts are most affected and why. Using Stable Diffusion v1.5 as a controlled testbed, we evaluate 15 subjects across three personalization methods on 200 prompts and report three findings about the organization of vision-language alignment: (1) aggregate disruption is larger for vision-backbone and cross-attention perturbations than for text-embedding perturbations, despite the latter directly modifying the language representation; (2) abstract and compositional language is significantly more fragile than concrete, object-specific language; and (3) disruption does not follow semantic proximity—personalizing for a face does not preferentially disrupt other face-related prompts (
), suggesting that alignment vulnerability is organized globally rather than purely by semantic category. These findings expose a structural vulnerability in current text-to-image personalization: the same cross-attention mechanism that enables compositional generalization also creates pathways through which local fine-tuning can propagate as global alignment shift.

How Fragile Is Vision-Language Alignment? Mapping Concept Disruption Under Text-to-Image Personalization

Automatic pronunciation assessment (APA) provides L2 learners with scalable and timely feedback on pronunciation proficiency in a target language, typically through goodness of pronunciation (GOP) features. GOP quantifies how well a pronounced phoneme matches the expected target sound by comparing acoustic features against the model's posterior probabilities. Traditional GOP relies on forced alignment to obtain these posteriors, but it suffers from acoustic-induced misalignments that degrade assessment reliability. Although the standard CTC-GOP approach bypasses forced alignment, it is limited by the inherent peaky behavior of CTC-based ASR models, which produces sparse posteriors and lacks stable temporal information. To address these issues in standard CTC, we propose a context-aware CTC framework incorporating output context dependency (OCD) in the CTC topology, along with label prior (LP) and maximum conditional entropy (EnCTC) regularization, to mitigate peakiness and produce more stable ASR logits suitable for GOP computation. Experiments on the speechocean762 corpus demonstrate that our best context-aware configurations achieve superior phoneme-level performance, outperforming the TDNN-F baseline and standard CTC in unified GOPT (phoneme PCC 0.641 vs. 0.612; word total PCC 0.582 vs. 0.549) while narrowing the gap in hierarchical HierCB scoring. These improvements widen the scoring margin between correct and mispronounced phonemes from 0.708 to 0.816 in GOPT. They also reveal that mitigating CTC peakiness and incorporating context dependency significantly enhance CTC-GOP stability and robustness, especially for alignment-free APA models.

Investigating Context-aware CTC for Pronunciation Assessment: Mitigating Peaky Behavior and Context Independency Assumption

Automated coaching for oral presentations sits at the intersection of computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT), prosody modeling, and speech synthesis, yet no prior work has systematically surveyed and compared existing systems along these dimensions. This survey reviews and categorizes automated presentation coaching systems, spanning pronunciation tutors, fluency and prosody coaches, multimodal trainers, and conference Q&A practice tools. We introduce a five-dimensional task taxonomy - covering segmental pronunciation, lexical stress, suprasegmental prosody, pacing, and content faithfulness - and explicitly map surveyed systems onto it to reveal coverage gaps. We further review the core technical methods these systems employ: TTS-based exemplar generation and diagnostic methods for pronunciation, prosody, and fluency assessment. Key open challenges include the scarcity of annotated presentation corpora, achieving accent-fair feedback across diverse L1 backgrounds, and delivering low-latency diagnostics for real-time rehearsal.

A Survey of Automated Presentation Coaching: Systems, Methods, and Open Challenges

Effective mathematics education requires identifying and responding to students' mistakes. For AI to support pedagogical applications, models must perform well across different levels of student proficiency. Our work provides an extensive, year-long snapshot of how 11 vision-language models (VLMs) perform on DrawEduMath, a QA benchmark involving real students' handwritten, hand-drawn responses to math problems. We find that models' weaknesses concentrate on a core component of math education: student error. All evaluated VLMs underperform when describing work from students who require more pedagogical help, and across all QA, they struggle the most on questions related to assessing student error. Thus, while VLMs may be optimized to be math problem solving experts, our results suggest that they require alternative development incentives to adequately support educational use cases.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Formal Machine Interpretation for the Semasiographic Mixtec Codices of Precolonial and Early Colonial Mesoamerica

Similar lecture

Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarization

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Formal Machine Interpretation for the Semasiographic Mixtec Codices of Precolonial and Early Colonial Mesoamerica

Similar lecture

Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarization

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Downloads