United States

The widespread integration of large language models (LLMs) across diverse domains, from entertainment to healthcare and banking, has underscored the pressing need to address the risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). Indeed, as LLMs have grown in scale, new challenges have emerged, including privacy breaches, dissemination of misinformation, issues related to robustness and alignment, and concerns regarding the societal biases ingrained in these models. In response, there has been a surge in research focused on responsible AI and AI safety. To address these challenges, recent literature has introduced novel techniques for mitigating the risks associated with LLMs and testing the efficacy of safety protocols through red-teaming. Despite these efforts, concerns persist regarding the perpetuation of biases in next-generation LLMs and the lack of robustness in existing safety measures. In this thesis proposal, we argue that some failures in LLM safety arise from flawed evaluation practices and explore ways to more effectively assess and characterize them.

ACL 2026

Thesis Proposal: Rethinking Safety Evaluation in Large Language Models

### Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Welcome to the 2025 meeting of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! I am proud to help organize the first NAACL conference to carry the new name of our organization, one that emphasizes inclusion for all of the Americas. I am also pleased to welcome you to Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state whose unique blend of cultural influences will make for an excellent backdrop for NAACL 2025, especially with this year’s special theme on NLP in a Multicultural World. 
**[Continue reading...](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jX-qGhqVSZZCIrAnJaz798pflu5Irrdn/view?usp=sharing)**

*- Colin Cherry, Google, NAACL 2025 General Chair* 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/b087f8a4dc5816d6e1a6514e59c59ac3.png)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T96GzPqObXrMln2BMByCSXTSizjTg69P/view?usp=sharing)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

To access NAACL 2025 event page you are required to register. Please follow [**this link**](https://2025.naacl.org/registration/registration/) to register. Access will depend on your registration type.

Please register!

NAACL 2025

Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

When large language models encounter conflicts between parametric knowledge and contextual evidence, does the parametric circuit's contribution change, or is the conflict resolved at the output distribution? We apply a three-level analysis framework, decomposing conflict resolution into circuit-level (parametric-site logit contribution, $\Phi_P$), pathway-level (MLP vs.\ attention), and output-level (token rank) effects across four transformer architectures spanning three attention types and two scale points. We find that $\Phi_P$ is near-invariant under conflict ($\leq$1.8\% variation), while output token ranks shift substantially, establishing that conflicts resolve through additive logit-space competition. Activation patching confirms parametric sites are causally sufficient and necessary, with contextual heads exerting 30--40$\times$ weaker influence. Layer-by-layer analysis reveals three architecturally determined resolution mechanisms, and parametric--contextual coupling decreases substantially with scale, exceeding random-subspace predictions. Domain generalization shows parametric sites are stratified by knowledge complexity with no overlap, yet the resolution mechanism generalizes across domains.

Dissociating Circuit-Level and Distribution-Level Effects of Knowledge Conflicts in LLMs

Before a tax authority can issue a ruling, it must receive a complete description of the taxpayer's situation---yet no benchmark measures whether language models can systematically elicit all relevant facts through dialogue. We introduce the \textbf{Factual State Discovery Benchmark}, in which a discovery agent questions a simulated taxpayer grounded in a real tax document. The dataset comprises 500 narratives from official Polish tax interpretations, decomposed into 32\,874 atomic facts with validated supported precision (97.6\%), atomicity (93.8\%), and sentence coverage (96.0\%). Experiments with four models show that even the best system recovers only 77\% of facts on easy samples and under 49\% on hard samples after 50 turns. These findings establish conversational fact elicitation as a challenging open problem requiring retrieval-augmented and adaptive questioning strategies.

Factual State Discovery Benchmark: Evaluating Fact Elicitation in Polish Tax Law

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for large language models are predominantly designed by hand based on domain knowledge and heuristics, limiting their scalability and generality. We apply LLM-powered evolutionary search to automatically discover unsupervised UQ methods represented as Python programs. On the task of atomic claim verification, our evolved methods outperform strong manually-designed baselines, achieving up to 6.7\% relative ROC-AUC improvement across 9 datasets while generalizing robustly out-of-distribution. Qualitative analysis reveals that different LLMs employ qualitatively distinct evolutionary strategies: Claude models consistently design high-feature-count linear estimators, while Gpt-oss-120B gravitates toward simpler and more interpretable positional weighting schemes. Surprisingly, only Sonnet 4.5 and Opus 4.5 reliably leverage increased method complexity to improve performance~-- Opus 4.6 shows an unexpected regression relative to its predecessor. Overall, our results hint that LLM-powered evolutionary search is a promising paradigm for automated, interpretable hallucination detector design.

Evolutionary Search for Automated Design of Uncertainty Quantification Methods

Recursive models that iteratively refine latent representations have demonstrated strong performance on variety of reasoning tasks. However, these models only control if and when to stop early, not how computation is distributed. In this work, we introduce shortcut reasoning, a framework for distilling recursive latent reasoning into a multiscale jump model that enables flexible test-time compute. We reinterpret recursive reasoning as a latent-time dynamical process and train a student model to predict the effect of multiple reasoning steps at once. To ensure robustness, we augment shortcut transitions with a repair mechanism, where a denoising base-model update projects approximate latent states back to a valid reasoning manifold. We further introduce stepwise improvement supervision, encouraging each shortcut step to increase the likelihood of the correct answer. Experiments on ARC-AGI show that our approach achieves competitive accuracy compared to recursive baselines while requiring fewer sequential updates.

Learning Shortcut Models for Efficient Recursive Reasoning

Multi-agent debate systems are usually evaluated only by whether the final answer is correct. However, this overlooks the quality of the intermediate reasoning that debate is meant to produce. This PhD research studies the relationship between three signals in multi-agent debate: token-level log-probability distributions over reasoning tokens, LLM-as-judge rubric scores assigned to those tokens, and final task accuracy. Instead of focusing only on final outputs, we examine whether internal confidence signals predict externally evaluated reasoning quality, and whether either signal is aligned with task correctness. We apply this framework to three domains: rubric-based scoring, mathematical reasoning, and factual question answering. Our setup uses a two-agent debate architecture in which a Constructor and an Auditor generate opposing reasoning traces while exposing token-level log-probabilities during decoding. A separate LLM-as-judge then scores each agent's reasoning using rubric-based criteria. Preliminary experiments show that early-token log-probability statistics correlate meaningfully with judge scores and are especially useful for identifying major reasoning failures. These findings motivate the broader cross-domain investigation proposed in this dissertation.

Thesis Proposal: When Does Confidence Signal Quality? Log-Probabilities and LLM-as-Judge in Multi-Agent Debate

Recent work has shown that LLMs develop internally coherent utility functions that emerge with scale, yet whether these value systems encode systematic demographic hierarchies remains unexplored. We elicit pairwise preferences across 15 intersectional demographic groups (defined by race, gender, and their combinations) and 8 policy domains on three 7--8B instruction-tuned LLMs, fitting Thurstonian utility models to the resulting preference matrices. All three models converge on a compensatory hierarchy that inverts real-world structural advantage, consistently ranking marginalized groups, the highest and dominant groups are lowest. Intersectional utilities do not combine additively: single-axis audits that measure gender and race gaps independently overestimate the most extreme intersectional gap by 26- 40\% in our experiments. Geometrically, we identify a linear direction in the representation space that predicts the full utility hierarchy from neutral sentences alone, and show that this direction is substantially aligned with gender encoding but not with race encoding. Orthogonalization reveals that gender separation in representations is not fully explained by utility encoding. The hierarchy is already present in base (pre-alignment) models and is amplified several-fold by instruction tuning, suggesting it originates in pre-training data rather than alignment procedures.

Convergent Demographic Utility Hierarchies: Geometry of Intersectional Values in LLMs

There are now multiple proposals for systems based on Large Language Models(LLMs) to conduct automated qualitative interviews. This approach scales up qualitative interview techniques that have traditionally been constrained by the high costs of data collection. However, most of the current solutions rely on proprietary LLMs, which compromise reproducibility and data security. They also rely on LLMs for all interview tasks, which limits standardisation of question wording as well as control over question order. To address these issues, we introduce the AInterviewer platform, based on a multi-agent framework that combines controlled question administration of survey software with the flexibility of LLMs. AInterviewer can run with locally hosted models to ensure security and transparency. Our platform provides a web-based GUI supporting each phase of data collection: from interview guide design and pilot testing to interview distribution and data collection monitoring.

AInterviewer: A Platform for Designing and Conducting AI-led Qualitative Interviews

We present **Dash-M5H**, an interactive dashboard for *multi-modal, multi-model mental health* assessment that helps clinicians and researchers jointly inspect multimodal behavioral data with multi-model signal outputs of recorded clinical interviews. Guided by signal detection and integrated sensemaking theories, Dash-M5H synchronizes transcript text, audio, and facial behavior (action units and gaze) to support overview-to-detail evidence tracing; and it integrates extracted signals (e.g., sentiment and facial activity) with a clinically grounded VLM prediction pipeline that produces DSM-5-aligned depression predictions. Dash-M5H (https://dash-m5h.io) is implemented in a lightweight, browser-based stack (Quarto + Observable JS + D3), supports local data import and time-synced clinical annotation with export. We demonstrate Dash-M5H through a depression screening scenario, evaluate its note-taking and screening capabilities through a user experiment, and release a live demo (https://youtu.be/w3qCJ02k6bw) and code (https://github.com/nd-hal/M5H-Dashboard-VLM) to facilitate reproducible evaluation.

Dash-M5H: An Interactive Dashboard for Multi-Modal, Multi-Model Mental Health Assessment

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate factually incorrect or unverifiable statements, motivating tool-augmented verification systems that combine model reasoning with external evidence retrieval. For factuality evaluation to be scientifically reliable, verification pipelines must be controllable and reproducible: retrieval configuration and reasoning behavior should be explicitly configurable and stable across runs. In practice, many existing systems depend on commercial search APIs whose ranking policies and retrieval behaviors are opaque and externally controlled, introducing uncontrolled variability into evaluation. This makes it difficult to disentangle reasoning errors from retrieval effects. We present FactSearch, a reproducible, claim-level factuality verification system built on locally aggregated open-source search infrastructure. FactSearch decomposes model outputs into atomic factual claims, retrieves supporting evidence via a self-hosted meta-search engine, and performs modular verification within a fully configurable pipeline. By treating retrieval infrastructure as a first-class component, the system enables deterministic configurations and systematic analysis of retrieval–reasoning interactions. An interactive web interface supports transparent inspection and practical deployment. A demo video is available at: 
\href{https://youtu.be/qbfA2vIxsiI}{https://youtu.be/qbfA2vIxsiI}. Code is at \href{https://github.com/aialt/factsearch}{https://github.com/aialt/factsearch}.

FactSearch: An Interactive Fact Search and Claim-Level Verification System for Large Language Models

Gardener is an interactive agentic system for single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) analysis that enables expert-steered, iterative workflows under strict data-residency requirements. Existing large language model (LLM)-based analysis agents commonly encode workflow progress as implicit conversational state and rely on cloud-centric execution, which hinders traceability and auditability and complicates keeping sensitive expression data on-device. Gardener grounds cloud-side reasoning in a local, on-device scientific engine and an Experiment Management Kernel (EMK) that externalizes analysis progress as persistent, immutable snapshots linked by lineage. This explicit state representation supports rollback, branching, and comparison of alternative analysis paths while reusing prior computation. Gardener enforces data isolation by design: cloud-hosted LLMs operate only on snapshot identifiers and sanitized summaries, while raw expression matrices and local artifacts remain on the user’s device. A local graphical user interface (GUI) provides human-in-the-loop steering and inspection of workflow state and outputs. Gardener is released as an open-source desktop application for macOS and Windows under the Apache License 2.0.

Next from ACL 2026

Dissociating Circuit-Level and Distribution-Level Effects of Knowledge Conflicts in LLMs

Similar lecture

Rethinking Safety Evaluation in Large Language Models: A Research Proposal

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES