United States

Explainability for Large Language Model (LLM) agents is especially challenging in interactive, partially observable settings, where decisions depend on evolving beliefs and other agents. We present TriEx, a tri-view explainability framework that instruments sequential decision making with aligned artifacts: (i) structured first-person self-reasoning bound to an action, (ii) explicit second-person belief states about opponents updated over time, and (iii) third-person oracle audits grounded in environment-derived reference signals. This design turns explanations from free-form narratives into evidence-anchored objects that can be compared and checked across time and perspectives. Using imperfect-information strategic games as a controlled testbed, we show that TriEx enables scalable analysis of explanation faithfulness, belief dynamics, and evaluator reliability, revealing systematic mismatches between what agents say, what they believe, and what they do. Our results highlight explainability as an interaction-dependent property and motivate multi-view, evidence-grounded evaluation for LLM agents.

ACL 2026

TriEx: A Game-based Tri-View Framework for Explaining Internal Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs

technical paper

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/acl2026

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Even when factually correct, social-media news previews (image-headline pairs) can induce interpretation drift: by selectively omitting crucial context, they lead readers to form judgments that diverge from what the full article supports. This covert harm is subtler than explicit misinformation, yet remains underexplored. To address this gap, we develop a multi-stage pipeline that simulates preview-based and context-based understanding, enabling construction of the MM-Misleading benchmark. Using MM-Misleading, we systematically evaluate open-source LVLMs and uncover pronounced blind spots in omission-based misleadingness detection. We further propose OMGuard, which combines (1) Interpretation-Aware Fine-Tuning for misleadingness detection and (2) Rationale-Guided Misleading Content Correction, where explicit rationales guide headline rewriting to reduce misleading impressions. Experiments show that OMGuard lifts an 8B model’s detection accuracy to the level of a 235B LVLM while delivering markedly stronger end-to-end correction. Further analysis shows that misleadingness usually arises from local narrative shifts, such as missing background, instead of global frame changes, and identifies image-driven cases where text-only correction fails, underscoring the need for visual interventions.

What's Left Unsaid? Detecting and Correcting Misleading Omissions in Multimodal News Previews

Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show strong potential for tackling complex tasks through collaborative intelligence. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) based methods provide promising approaches for enhancing MAS self-training by generating synthetic data, using Q-values to estimate agent contributions. However, relying solely on Q-values may misalign with the goal of selecting data most beneficial for MAS improvement. To address this discrepancy, we propose **D**ata **I**nfluence-oriented **T**ree **S**earch (**DITS**), a novel framework that incorporates influence scores to guide both tree search and data selection in data synthesis. By leveraging influence scores, we effectively identify the most impactful data for MAS improvement, thereby enhancing model performance. Furthermore, we derive a novel influence score estimation method tailored for non-differentiable metrics, significantly reducing computational overhead by calculating performance changes on the validation set. Extensive experiments on three different multi-agent tasks demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed methods. Notably, our findings reveal that allocating more resources to estimate influence scores, rather than Q-values, during data synthesis can more effectively and efficiently enhance model training. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DITS-F1C4/.

Efficient Multi-Agent System Training with Data Influence-Oriented Tree Search

Idiom translation remains a formidable challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), as the constraints of static parametric memory and the noise in sentence-level retrieval often lead to literal misinterpretations. To address this, we propose DeReA, a detect-retrieve-arbitrate framework. The system employs a preference-aligned detector to identify idiomatic spans by reasoning over semantic conflicts between literal and contextual meanings. Subsequently, an idiom-centric translator invokes a fine-tuned embedding model to efficiently retrieve canonical definitions from an external knowledge base. The translator then utilizes a dual-path arbitration mechanism to select the optimal rendering by weighing the retrieval-augmented translations against direct translation. To evaluate our framework, we introduce LoMI, a high-difficulty benchmark with low data contamination. Experimental results demonstrate that DeReA significantly enhances performance across various model scales, improving GPT-5-mini by over 5.2 points in both idiomatic quality and consistency according to LLM-based metrics. Furthermore, evaluations on an emerging slang dataset from Urban Dictionary validate the potential of our approach in handling novel and evolving linguistic data. Our code is available at https://github.com/jrongqing/DeReA.

DeReA: Improving Idiom Translation with Detect-Retrieve-Arbitrate Reasoning

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex interactive decision-making tasks.
However, existing LLM agents typically rely on increasingly long interaction histories, resulting in high computational cost and limited scalability.
In this paper, we propose **STEP-HRL**, a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework that enables step-level learning by conditioning only on single-step transitions rather than full interaction histories.
STEP-HRL structures tasks hierarchically, using completed subtasks to represent *global progress* of overall task. By introducing a *local progress* module, it also iteratively and selectively summarizes interaction history within each subtask to produce a compact summary of local progress.
Together, these components yield augmented step-level transitions for both high-level and low-level policies.
Experimental results on ScienceWorld and ALFWorld benchmarks consistently demonstrate that STEP-HRL substantially outperforms baselines in terms of performance and generalization while reducing token usage. Our code is available at https://github.com/TonyStark042/STEP-HRL.

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Step-Level Transitions for LLM Agents

Multimodal Sarcasm Understanding (MSU) comprises multiple subtasks, demanding both incongruity perception and intent reasoning. However, this progress is impeded by two bottlenecks. First, the lack of a unified benchmark for holistic satirical cognition hinders comprehensive evaluation of MSU. Second, jointly modeling these heterogeneous subtasks often leads to feature entanglement. Specifically, while subtasks share a dependence on incongruity, they diverge in granular focus, causing specific execution patterns to erode the fundamental perception capability. To address these challenges, we make two contributions. First, we introduce DocMSU-PLUS, a comprehensive benchmark covering five cognitive dimensions of MSU. All tasks are reformulated into multiple-choice questions (MCQs), enabling a unified accuracy-based evaluation. Second, we propose the Dual Orthogonal Stream Experts (DOSE) framework. DOSE structurally decouples experts into orthogonal shared perception and private execution streams to physically block gradient interference between tasks. Experiments demonstrate that DOSE achieves superior performance on DocMSU-PLUS, effectively balancing general perception with task-specific adaptation.

Two Streams, One Sarcasm: Orthogonal Expert Tuning for Holistic Multimodal Sarcasm Understanding

Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers. In this paper, we study automatic generation of such tables from a pool of papers to satisfy a user’s information need. Building on recent work (Newman et al., 2024), we move beyond oracle settings by (i) simulating well-specified yet schema-agnostic user demands that avoid leaking gold column names or values, (ii) explicitly modeling retrieval noise via semantically related but out-of-scope distractor papers verified by human annotators, and (iii) introducing a lightweight, annotation-free, utilization-oriented evaluation that decomposes utility (schema coverage, unary cell fidelity, pairwise relational consistency) and measures paper selection via a two-way QA procedure (gold→system and system→gold) with recall, precision, and F1. To support reproducible evaluation, we introduce arXiv2Table, a benchmark of 1,957 tables referencing 7,158 papers, with human-verified distractors and rewritten, schema-agnostic user demands. We also develop an iterative, batch-based generation method that co-refines paper filtering and schema over multiple rounds. We validate the evaluation protocol with human audits and cross-evaluator checks. Extensive experiments show that our method consistently improves over strong baselines, while absolute scores remain modest, underscoring the task’s difficulty. Our data and code is available at https://github.com/JHU-CLSP/arXiv2Table.

arXiv2Table: Toward Realistic Benchmarking and Evaluation for LLM-Based Literature-Review Table Generation

Generative speech technologies are progressing rapidly, but evaluating the perceptual quality of synthetic speech remains a core challenge. Existing methods typically rely on scalar scores or binary decisions, which lack interpretability and generalization across tasks and languages. We present SpeechLLM-as-Judges, a new paradigm for enabling large language models (LLMs) to conduct structured and explanation-based speech quality evaluation. To support this direction, we introduce SpeechEval, a large-scale dataset containing 32,207 multilingual speech clips and 128,754 annotations spanning four tasks: quality assessment, pairwise comparison, improvement suggestion, and deepfake detection. Based on this resource, we develop SQ-LLM, a speech-quality-aware LLM trained with chain-of-thought reasoning and reward optimization to improve capability. Experimental results show that SQ-LLM delivers strong performance across tasks and languages, revealing the potential of this paradigm for advancing speech quality evaluation. The relevant code, models, and data are publicly available at https://github.com/NKU-HLT/SpeechLLM-as-Judges.

SpeechLLM-as-Judges: Towards General and Interpretable Speech Quality Evaluation

Users increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) for Deep Research, using them to synthesize diverse sources into structured reports that support understanding and action. In this context, the practical reliability of such reports hinges on logical quality: whether the report’s claims and arguments are explicitly supported and can be trusted as a basis for downstream use, rather than merely appearing fluent or informative. However, current evaluation frameworks largely overlook this requirement. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReportLogic, a benchmark that quantifies report-level logical quality through a reader-centric lens of auditability. Specifically, ReportLogic adopts a hierarchical taxonomy that evaluates whether readers can (1) trace an on-topic report structure with a unified analytical arc (Macro-Logic), (2) understand the progression with necessary context (Expositional-Logic), and (3) verify conclusions via explicit claim--support (Structural-Logic). Based on this taxonomy, we construct a human-annotated rubric-guided dataset and train an open-source LogicJudge for scalable evaluation. We further evaluate judge robustness via adversarial attacks, showing that off-the-shelf LLM judges are frequently influenced by superficial cues (e.g., verbosity), and reasoning modes can mask broken support relations. Overall, our results provide actionable guidance for building more robust logic evaluators and improving the logical reliability of LLM-generated reports.

ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to automate real-world vulnerability detection due to two key limitations: the heterogeneity of vulnerability patterns undermines the effectiveness of a single unified model, and manual prompt engineering for massive weakness categories is unscalable.
To address these challenges, we propose MulVul, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent framework designed for precise and broad-coverage vulnerability detection. MulVul adopts a coarse-to-fine strategy: a Router agent first predicts the top- coarse categories and then forwards the input to specialized Detector agents, which identify the exact vulnerability types. Both agents use evidence retrieved from vulnerability knowledge bases to mitigate hallucinations. Crucially, to automate the generation of specialized prompts, we design Cross-Model Prompt Evolution, a prompt optimization mechanism where a generator LLM iteratively refines candidate prompts while a distinct executor LLM validates their effectiveness. This decoupling mitigates the self-correction bias inherent in single-model optimization. Evaluated on 130 CWE types, MulVul achieves 34.79% Macro-F1, outperforming the best baseline by 41.5%. Ablation studies validate cross-model prompt evolution, which boosts performance by 51.6% over manual prompts by effectively handling diverse vulnerability patterns.

MulVul: Retrieval-augmented Multi-Agent Code Vulnerability Detection via Cross-Model Prompt Evolution

Natural language to SQL (NL2SQL) provides an intuitive interface for querying structured data, yet real user questions are often noisy, ambiguous, and weakly grounded to database semantics.
As a result, token-level schema linking and single-pass SQL decoding can be brittle: small misunderstandings in language or schema grounding may propagate into incorrect generation.
We present \textit{QBridge}, an agentic, feedback-driven NL2SQL framework based on a \textit{Refined Gold Query Paradigm}, which bridges natural language and SQL via \textit{Gold Query}---a structured, SQL-aligned intermediate representation.
A core insight of \textit{QBridge} is \textit{Distilled Back-Translation (DBT)} for SL-independent rewriting.
DBT converts SQL-grounded supervision into \emph{execution-verified} Gold-Query-style rewrites from a teacher model, and distills a lightweight, plug-and-play rewriter that generates schema-aware rewrites without requiring explicit schema linking at inference.
\textit{QBridge} then (i) verifies and conservatively refines the rewrite into a high-fidelity \textit{Refined Gold Query}, and (ii) refines the generated SQL with dual feedback from execution validity and semantic consistency, enabling interpretable self-correction while remaining compatible with diverse SQL backbones.
Extensive experiments on Spider, BIRD, and three robustness variants demonstrate that \textit{QBridge} consistently improves zero-shot NL2SQL, outperforming strong prompting and agentic baselines while showing strong robustness and generalization. Code and data are available at \url{https://github.com/WannaBSteve/QBridge}.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

What's Left Unsaid? Detecting and Correcting Misleading Omissions in Multimodal News Previews

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES