Large language models (LLMs) achieve state-of-the-art performance in machine translation, but are also known to be sensitive to errors in user prompts. Given these models are largely trained on and respond best to prompts in standard English, this may affect the quality of LLM outputs for second language English speakers as well as real-world lay users, with potentially disproportionate effects on the former. We explore this effect by modeling a range of error types exhibited by such users, motivated by studies of L2 English, and quantifying their impact on LLM performance. We work with two related tasks: machine translation and machine translation evaluation. We find that LLMs-as-MT are brittle to natural spelling errors but not to errors at the phrasal level. However, the variance in quality caused by these errors is lower than the variance over the initial prompt choice, suggesting that perfect English'' for a given prompt is less important than choosing a good prompt. Since lay users and L2 speakers may use non-optimal prompts as well as display imperfect language skills, our work calls for increasing the resilience of model performance to both these phenomena to best serve a diverse user base, both from a robustness and fairness perspective.