Morocco

Modern language models excel at factual reasoning but struggle with value diversity: the multiplicity of plausible human perspectives. Tasks such as hate speech or sexism detection expose this limitation, where human disagreement captures the diversity of perspectives that models need to account for, rather than dataset noise. In this paper, we explore whether multi-perspective in-context learning (ICL) can align large language models (LLMs) with this diversity without parameter updates. We evaluate four LLMs on five datasets across three languages (English, Arabic, Italian), considering three label-space representations (aggregated hard, disaggregated hard, and disaggregated soft) and five demonstration selection and ordering strategies. Our multi-perspective approach outperforms standard prompting on aggregated English labels, while disaggregated soft predictions better align with human judgments in Arabic and Italian datasets.These findings highlight the importance of perspective-aware LLMs for reducing bias and polarization, while also revealing the challenges of applying ICL to socially sensitive tasks. We further probe the model faithfulness using XAI, offering insights into how LLMs handle human disagreement.

EACL 2026

Seeing All Sides: Multi-Perspective In-Context Learning for Subjective NLP

human disagreement

in-context learning

explainability

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

ACL 2025

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

poster

#### *Message from the General Chair, Aline Villavicencio*
I’m delighted and honoured to welcome you to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2026), taking place in the beautiful city of Rabat, in Morocco, in March 24-29, 2026. EACL is the flagship European conference of the Association and EACL 2026 proudly continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity. I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers whose dedication, generosity, and tireless efforts have made this conference possible.
For the first time EACL is being hosted in the African continent. This is an important milestone for our community, and we are grateful to our Moroccan hosts for enabling this historic moment by bringing this edition of EACL to Rabat. We are also delighted that the Second Arabic NLP School is co-located with EACL. We hope attendees enjoy this wonderful opportunity to strengthen ties with the Computational Linguistics communities across the African continent. *[Read full message](https://drive.google.com/file/d/14NlmHvwM6fPJuMmOvVh7K0vtQbEyv3SZ/view?usp=sharing)* 

<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://underline.io/events/522/reception','_blank')">Go to Workshops and Tutorials Program</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to EACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.eacl.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/eacl2026

Registration Required

Welcome to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). EACL 2026 will be held in Rabat, Morocco, from March 24–29, 2026. 

No. Whilst Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been shown to perform very well on general video data, we systematically show that their performance on movies lags behind. This is surprising as MLLMs are increasingly used for movie understanding. To measure the performance of MLLMs on movies, we explore three pillars of movie mastery: movie knowledge, cinematographic knowledge, and critical analysis. Through a combination of quantitative and in-depth qualitative evaluations we identify where MLLMs show promise and, in particular, where they fail. Our findings show that in small-scale settings involving factual knowledge, MLLMs are able to outperform existing methods. However, once cinematographic and critical analysis is required, MLLMs are insufficiently able to extract meaningful information from the visual modality to be able to provide useful insights.

Are Multimodal LLMs Movie Buffs?

Graphical User Interface (GUI) grounding is critical for effective GUI agents. Despite recent progress, key challenges remain: 1) existing grounding models and benchmarks are skewed toward web and mobile environments, neglecting desktop interfaces (especially windows); and 2) grounding capability is assessed using accuracy on a single "best" instruction per UI element. However, users can refer to a UI element in diverse valid ways -- via visual attributes, spatial relations, etc, and a capable grounding model should produce consistent outputs across such variations. Focusing on desktop environments, we introduce GUI Grounding Sensitivity Benchmark, which investigates the model sensitivity to multiple descriptions of the same UI element. We design an automatic pipeline to generate multiple valid instructions per UI element, and develop nuanced data validation methods, as frontier models even hallucinate to produce a single instruction. Evaluation of 12 models reveals they are reasonably sensitive and their performance on existing benchmarks does not reflect their true ability. Building on the insight that a given grounding model struggles more with certain instructions or relations, we introduce the GUI Grounding Diagnosis Agent, which generates challenging instructions using model feedback and iterative refinement. Our agent reports high success rate (upto 84%) in generating instructions that fail the state-of-the-art GUI grounding models.

Do GUI Grounders Truly Understand UI Elements?

While chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting improves reasoning in large language models, its effectiveness in vision-language models (VLMs) remains limited due to over-reliance on textual cues and memorized knowledge. To investigate the visual reasoning capabilities of VLMs in complex real-world scenarios, we introduce DrivingVQA, a visual question answering dataset derived from driving theory exams, which contains 3,931 multiple-choice problems with expert-written explanations and grounded entities relevant to the reasoning process. Leveraging this dataset, we explore the benefits of incorporating entity-related information, such as entity names, spatial coordinates, and visual content, through supervised fine-tuning to enhance the modelХs reasoning abilities. Our experiments demonstrate that interleaving textual explanations with visual tokens extracted from entities relevant to the question improves answer accuracy by 3.1% and reasoning accuracy by 4.6% over vanilla CoT prompting. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this retrieval-based approach effectively scales to the larger A-OKVQA reasoning dataset by leveraging automatically generated pseudo-labels, outperforming CoT prompting.

DRIVINGVQA: A Dataset for Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought in Real-World Driving Scenarios

Dashboards are powerful visualization tools for data-driven decision-making, integrating multiple interactive views that allow users to explore, filter, and navigate data. Unlike static charts, dashboards support rich interactivity, which is essential for uncovering insights in real-world analytical workflows. However, existing question-answering benchmarks for data visualizations largely overlook this interactivity, focusing instead on static charts. This limitation severely constrains their ability to evaluate the capabilities of modern multimodal agents designed for GUI-based reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce DashboardQA, the first benchmark explicitly designed to assess how vision-language GUI agents comprehend and interact with real-world dashboards. The benchmark includes 292 tasks on 112 interactive dashboards, encompassing 405 question answer pairs overall. These questions span five categories: multiple-choice, factoid, hypothetical, multi-dashboard, and conversational. By assessing a variety of leading closed- and open-source GUI agents, our analysis reveals their key limitations, particularly in grounding dashboard elements, planning interaction trajectories, and performing reasoning. Our findings indicate that interactive dashboard reasoning is a challenging task overall for all the VLMs evaluated. Even the top-performing agents struggle; for instance, the best agent based on Gemini-Pro-2.5 achieves only 38.69% accuracy, while the OpenAI CUA agent reaches just 22.69%, demonstrating the benchmark's significant difficulty. We release DashboardQA at ..

DashboardQA: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Question Answering on Interactive Dashboards

We introduce VIGiA, a novel multimodal dialogue model designed to understand and reason over complex, multi-step instructional video action plans. Unlike prior work which focuses mainly on text-only guidance, or treats vision and language in isolation, VIGiA supports grounded, plan-aware dialogue that requires reasoning over visual inputs, instructional plans, and interleaved user interactions. To this end, VIGiA incorporates two key capabilities: (1) multimodal plan reasoning, enabling the model to align uni- and multimodal queries with the current task plan and respond accurately; and (2) plan-based retrieval, allowing it to retrieve relevant plan steps in either textual or visual representations. Experiments were done on a novel dataset with rich Instructional Video Dialogues aligned with Cooking and DIY plans. Our evaluation shows that VIGiA outperforms existing state-of-the-art models on all tasks in a conversational plan guidance setting, reaching over 90% accuracy on plan-aware VQA.

VIGiA: Instructional Video Guidance via Dialogue Reasoning and Retrieval

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at mathematical reasoning in English, but their performance in low-resource languages remains underexplored. This gap is particularly critical for Indonesia, where equitable access to AI-powered education depends on robust multilingual reasoning across diverse local languages. We introduce MATH-IDN, a multilingual benchmark for mathematical problem solving in Indonesian, Javanese, Sundanese, and Buginese, with English as reference. Each subset contains expert-verified problems spanning seven subjects and five difficulty levels. We evaluate eight open-source LLM families, including math-specialized, Southeast-Asian-adapted, and general-purpose models, under a zero-shot chain-of-thought setting. Results show that MATH-IDN presents a challenging and discriminative benchmark, revealing substantial performance gaps in low-resource languagesвЂ”particularly for BugineseвЂ”and highlighting key limitations in current multilingual reasoning capabilities. Anonymous link to the data repository: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MATH_IDN-EA85

MATH-IDN: A Multilingual Mathematical Problem Solving Dataset Featuring Local Languages in Indonesia

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) benefits from a dynamic routing mechanism among their specialized experts, which existing Parameter- Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) strategies often fail to leverage. This motivates us to investigate whether adaptation modules themselves should incorporate routing mechanisms to align with MoE's multi-expert architecture. We analyze dynamics of core components when applying PEFT to MoE language models, and examine how different routing strategies affect adaptation effectiveness. Extensive experiments adapting OLMoE-1B-7B and Mixtral-8Г—7B on various commonsense and math reasoning tasks validate the performance and efficiency of our routed approach. We identify optimal configurations for different scenarios and provide empirical analyses with practical insights to facilitate better PEFT and MoE applications.

Parameter-Efficient Routed Fine-Tuning: Mixture-of-Experts Demands Mixture of Adaptation Modules

Large language model context lengths have grown rapidly in recent years, from 512 tokens in GPT to 2M tokens in Gemini 1.5 Pro. Larger context windows enable models to condition on significantly more input tokens, leading to higher quality responses for some user prompts. However, longer contexts also pose challenges to system instruction adherence. In this work, we formalize verifiable instructions to evaluate model compliance based on clear, measurable criteria. From this criteria, we present **VerIFY**, a **Ver**ifiable **I**nstruction **F**ollowing **Y**ardstick dataset designed to benchmark the compliance and accuracy of LLMs in adhering to various types of instructions across multi-turn, long-context conversations. From experiments with open-source models, we reveal insights into instruction-following failures in long contexts, helping to improve the reliability, safety, and precision of these models. Furthermore, we implement and evaluate six mitigation strategies to enhance instruction compliance in extended contexts, achieving an improvement up to 79%. This is the first work to consider instruction following for multi-turn, long context conversations.

We Are What We Repeatedly Do: Improving Long Context Instruction Following

Benchmarks for language models have become essential tools for research. Yet, such benchmarks face a persistent contamination problem, with recent studies finding 25-50% of evaluation datasets appearing in training corpora. This is true even looking at the two-player zero-sum game setting, where most benchmarks are based on popular games, like chess, whose optimal strategies are all over the web. Such contamination hinders the possibility to differentiate memorization and reasoning skills. To rectify these problems, we introduce TCG-Bench, a benchmark based on a new two-player trading card game (TCG), similar in spirit to games like Magic: The Gathering. TCG-Bench offers three key innovations: (1) a contamination-resistant design by separating the publicly released game engine from hidden card implementations, (2) a continuous difficulty spectrum via Monte Carlo simulation that prevents benchmark saturation, and (3) a parallel implementation in English and Arabic, the first multilingual text-based game benchmark to do so. We also formalize a practical threat model and refresh protocol that preserves evaluation integrity even if specific cards leak. Our analysis across 17 models (50,000+ games) reveals that performance declines exponentially with difficulty, while model size correlates only weakly with strategic ability. We also observe cross-linguistic performance gaps between English and Arabic, with a gap of 47.4% at 32B, highlighting the need for multilingual game benchmarks that target reasoning capabilities in the target language. We host a leaderboard showcasing these results and welcome evaluation requests on our private cards.

Cards Against Contamination: TCG-Bench for Difficulty-Scalable Multilingual LLM Reasoning

Do large language models (LLMs) serve as proxies for human linguistic variation? We investigate this question through Hindi-English verb code-mixing, where speakers can use either a Hindi verb or an English verb with the light verb \textit{karna} (`do'). Both forms are grammatical, but speakers show gradient preferences without clear theoretical explanationвЂ”an ideal test of whether LLMs capture genuine sociolinguistic variation beyond formal rules. We collect preference ratings from 14 native speakers across 30 verb pairs in minimal pair contexts (moderate agreement, Krippendorff's О± = 0.365) and compare these to perplexity ratios from 7 base LLMs spanning families, sizes, and training compositions. Three experiments reveal systematic failure: unsupervised prediction performs at chance (F1 в‰¤ 0.33), supervised 4-way classification barely improves (F1 = 0.43), and binary classification achieves adequate performance (F1 = 0.81) for only one model after exhaustive feature searchвЂ”requiring the very human labels LLMs were meant to replace while discarding the gradient information linguists need. Models show no scaling effects and exhibit arbitrary systematic biases inconsistent with training data or human judgments. We conclude that current LLMs learn surface correlations without internalizing underlying sociolinguistic processes, and do not reliably model gradient linguistic variation. We release human ratings, perplexity ratios for 4,279 verb pairs across 7 models, and experimental materials.

Downloads

Next from EACL 2026

Are Multimodal LLMs Movie Buffs?

Similar lecture

Towards Multi-Perspective NLP Systems: A Thesis Proposal

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES