Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) is a principled approach for generalizing regularities from data and constructing hypotheses as interpretable logic programs. However, a key limitation is its reliance on expert-crafted language bias—the predicate inventory, types, and mode declarations that delimit the search space. We propose hypothesis generation via LLM-automated language bias: multi-agent LLMs design the bias from raw text and translate descriptions into typed facts, and a robust ILP solver induces rules under a global consistency objective. This approach reduces traditional ILP’s reliance on predefined symbolic structures and the noise sensitivity of LLM-only pipelines that directly generate hypotheses as text or code. Extensive experiments in diverse, challenging scenarios validate superior performance, providing a practical, explainable, and verifiable route to hypothesis generation.