Cooperation among independent learning agents is desirable as it enables reaching collectively rewarding states. Recent work has shown that artificial agents can learn to act pro-socially without the need for predefined cooperative preferences or behavioural heuristics, provided that they can observe others' actions or policies and select them as partners accordingly. This paper relaxes this constraint, studying reinforcement learning (RL) agents operating with only minimal information about others' behaviour. We propose a novel `Observer Model', where agents gain insights from direct experience and limited, indirect observations. We show that direct experience alone cannot sustain cooperation, particularly in large societies. However, even minimal observations, allowing as few as one observer per gameplay, lead to significant improvements, enabling the population to achieve and sustain robust cooperation across varying population sizes. Through numerical analysis, we show the co-evolution of strategy and interaction structure and disentangle how learning happens under various settings. Analysing the partner selection graph, we identify the reasons for cooperation to emerge or fail to do so, and we explore how different learning and exploration rates affect the outcome of social dilemmas played among RL agents.