India

Chemical molecules can be represented as graphs or as language descriptions. Training unimodal models on graphs results in different encodings than training them on language. Therefore, the existing literature force-aligns the unimodal models during training to use them in downstream applications such as drug discovery. But to what extent are \textit{graph} and \textit{language} unimodal model representations inherently aligned, i.e., aligned prior to any force-alignment training? Knowing this is useful for a more expedient and effective forced-alignment. For the first time, we explore methods to gauge the alignment of graph and language unimodal models. We find compelling differences between models and their ability to represent slight structural differences without force-alignment. We also present an \underline{u}nified \underline{u}nimodal \underline{a}lignment (\textbf{U2A}) benchmark for gauging the inherent alignment between graph and language encoders which we make available with this paper\footnote{GitHub link: \href{https://github.com/caocongfeng/U2A.git}{U2A Benchmark Repository}}.

IJCNLP-AACL 2025

How Aligned Are Unimodal Language and Graph Encodings of Chemical Molecules?

unimodal model alignment

graph model

language model

### Welcome to IJCNLP-AACL 2025! 
 It is a great honor to host this joint conference in Mumbai, India, from December 20 to 24, 2025. The joint conferences of IJCNLP and AACL are organized with alternating leadership in the Asia-Pacific region. The event is run by the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (AFNLP) in odd years, and by AACL in even years, while it is organized solely by ACL when the annual ACL meeting is held in the region. This year, the conference is primarily organized by AFNLP. 
*Kentaro Inui
MBZUAI, UAE
General Chair, IJCNLP-AACL 2025* 
Read full message and download the Conference Handbook [**here**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTwxkAqSqI-GAoJC3wE1zZt5VP1Y8GX0/view?usp=sharing).

To access this event page, you will need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to IJCNLP-AACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2025.aaclnet.org/registration/) first.


The 14th IJCNLP & 4th AACL will be held in Mumbai, India from December 20th to December 24th, 2025.

Peer review, as a cornerstone of scientific research, ensures the integrity and quality of scholarly work by providing authors with objective feedback for refinement. However, in the traditional peer review process, authors often receive vague or insufficiently detailed feedback, which provides limited assistance and leads to a more time-consuming review cycle. If authors can identify some specific weaknesses in their paper, they can not only address the reviewer's concerns but also improve their work. This raises the critical question of how to enhance authors' comprehension of review comments. In this paper, we present SEAGraph a novel framework developed to clarify review comments by uncovering the underlying intentions behind them. We construct two types of graphs for each paper: the semantic mind graph, which captures the author’s thought process, and the hierarchical background graph, which delineates the research domains related to the paper. A retrieval method is then designed to extract relevant content from both graphs, facilitating coherent explanations for the review comments. Extensive experiments show that SEAGraph excels in review comment understanding tasks, offering significant benefits to authors. By bridging the gap between reviewers’ critiques and authors’ comprehension, SEAGraph contributes to a more efficient, transparent, and collaborative scientific publishing ecosystem. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/seagraph/.

SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments

Language models have shown strong capabilities across a wide range of tasks in software engineering, such as code generation, yet they suffer from hallucinations. While hallucinations have been studied independently in natural language and code generation, their occurrence in tasks involving {code changes which have a structurally complex and context-dependent format of code remains largely unexplored.} This paper presents the first comprehensive analysis of hallucinations in two critical tasks involving code {change} to natural language generation: commit message generation and code review comment generation. We quantify the prevalence of hallucinations in recent language models and explore a range of metric-based approaches to automatically detect them. Our findings reveal that approximately 50% of generated code reviews and 20% of generated commit messages contain hallucinations. Whilst commonly used metrics are weak detectors on their own, combining multiple metrics substantially improves performance. Notably, model confidence and feature attribution metrics effectively contribute to hallucination detection, showing promise for inference-time detection.

Hallucinations in Code Change to Natural Language Generation: Prevalence and Evaluation of Detection Metrics

Although the use of persona prompting in large language models appears to trigger different styles of generated text, it is unclear whether these translate into measurable behavioral differences. Furthermore, little work has studied whether these differences, when they do exist, can affect decision-making in an adversarial strategic environment. We investigate the impact of persona prompting on strategic performance in PERIL, a world domination board game. Specifically, we compare the effectiveness of persona-derived heuristics to those chosen manually. Our findings reveal that personality traits intuitively associated with strategic thinking do appear to improve game performance, but only when an additional mediator is used to translate personas into heuristic values. We introduce this mediator as a structured translation process, inspired by exploratory factor analysis, that maps LLM-generated inventory responses into strategic heuristics. Results indicate our method enhances heuristic reliability and face validity when compared to directly inferred heuristics, allowing us to better study the effect of persona types on decision-making behaviors. These insights advance our understanding of how persona prompting influences LLM-based decision-making and propose a novel heuristic generation method that adds to the growing body of work applying psychometric principles to LLMs.

Do Persona-Infused LLMs Affect Performance in a Strategic Reasoning Game?

The rapid escalation from elementary school-level to frontier problems of the difficulty for LLM benchmarks in recent years seems to bring us close enough to the ``last exam'' for LLMs to surpass humanity. However, is the LLMs' remarkable reasoning ability indeed coming from true intelligence by human standards, or are they actually reciting solutions witnessed during training at an Internet level? To study this problem, we propose RoR-Bench, a novel, multi-modal benchmark for detecting LLM's recitation behavior when asked simple reasoning problems but with conditions subtly shifted, and conduct empirical analysis on our benchmark. Surprisingly, we found existing cutting-edge LLMs unanimously exhibits extremely severe recitation behavior; by changing one phrase in the condition, top models such as OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1 can suffer 60 percent performance loss on elementary school-level arithmetic and reasoning problems. Such findings are a wake-up call to the LLM community that compels us to reevaluate the true intelligence level of cutting-edge LLMs.

Recitation over Reasoning: How Cutting-Edge Language Models Can Fail on Elementary School-Level Reasoning Problems?

This paper investigates defenses in LLM-based evaluation, where prompt injection attacks can manipulate scores by deceiving the evaluation system. We formalize blind attacks as a class in which candidate answers are crafted independently of the true answer. To counter such attacks, we propose an evaluation framework that combines standard and counterfactual evaluation. Experiments show it significantly improves attack detection with minimal performance trade-offs for recent models.

Counterfactual Evaluation for Blind Attack Detection in LLM-based Evaluation Systems

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful zero- and few-shot learners. However, when predicting over a set of candidate options, LLMs suffer from label biases, and existing calibration methods overlook biases arising from multi-token class labels. We tackle an issue we call *label length bias*, where labels of different lengths are treated inconsistently, even after standard length normalization. To mitigate it, we propose *normalized contextual calibration* (NCC), an effective method that normalizes and calibrates predictions at the full-label level. NCC achieves statistically significant improvements over prior approaches across multiple datasets and models, with gains of up to 10\% F1. Moreover, NCC extends bias mitigation to broader tasks such as multiple-choice question answering. Our analysis shows that, when combined with in-context learning, NCC is less sensitive to few-shot example selection, requires fewer examples for competitive performance, and produces more reliable confidence estimates. These findings highlight the importance of mitigating full-label biases to improve the performance and robustness of LLM-based methods, particularly in real-world applications where class labels naturally consist of multiple tokens.

Mitigating Label Length Bias in Large Language Models

We present PerMed-MM, the first multimodal benchmark for Persian medical question answering. The dataset comprises 733 expert-authored multiple-choice questions from Iranian National Medical Board Exams, each paired with one to five clinically relevant images, spanning 46 medical specialties and diverse visual modalities. We evaluate five open-source and five proprietary vision language models, and find that reasoning supervision and domain-specific fine-tuning yield performance gains. Our cross-lingual analysis reveals significant unpredictability in translation-based pipelines, motivating the need for benchmarks that support direct, native-language evaluation. Additionally, domain- and modality-level analysis uncovers meaningful variation in model behavior often masked by aggregate metrics. PerMed-MM is publicly available on Hugging Face.

PerMed-MM: A Multimodal, Multi-Specialty Persian Medical Benchmark for Evaluating Vision Language Models

We introduced PerCoR—Persian Commonsense Reasoning—the first large-scale Persian benchmark for commonsense reasoning. PerCoR contains 106K multiple-choice sentence-completion problems drawn from more than forty news, cultural and other web sources. We adopt a linguistically grounded, conjunction-based segmentation strategy to generate coherent prefix–continuation pairs. To create challenging distractors, we propose DRESS-AF—Distractor Ranking via Embedding Similarity Scoring and Adversarial Filtering—a generation-free adversarial filtering method that selects distractors from the pool of gold continuations while maximising model confusion. Human annotators score 89% on PerCoR, while OpenAI-o3 achieves the highest performance at 92.18%, followed closely by Claude-Sonnet-3.7 (91.17%). The strongest open-source model, DeepSeek-R1, reaches 82.51%, underscoring both the dataset’s difficulty and the remaining performance gap in Persian commonsense reasoning. We further show that DRESS-AF transfers to the English HellaSwag benchmark, increasing its difficulty without hurting human solvability. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/MCINext/PerCoR .

PerCoR: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning in Persian via Multiple-Choice Sentence Completion

Extracting sensory information from text, particularly olfactory references, is challenging due to limited annotated datasets and the implicit, subjective nature of sensory experiences. This study investigates whether GPT-4o-generated data can complement or replace human annotations. We evaluate human- and LLM-labeled corpora on two tasks: coarse-grained detection of olfactory content and fine-grained sensory term extraction. Despite lexical variation, generated texts align well with real data in semantic and sensorimotor embedding spaces. Models trained on synthetic data perform strongly, especially in low-resource settings. Human annotations offer better recall by capturing implicit and diverse aspects of sensoriality, while GPT-4o annotations show higher precision through clearer pattern alignment. Data augmentation experiments confirm the utility of synthetic data, though trade-offs remain between label consistency and lexical diversity. These findings support using synthetic data to enhance sensory information mining when annotated data is limited.

Enhancing Low-Resource Text Classification with LLM-Generated Corpora : A Case Study on Olfactory Reference Extraction

Recent advances in automatic evaluation of natural language generation have increasingly relied on large language models as general-purpose metrics. While effective, these approaches often require high-capacity models, which introduce substantial computational costs, and remain susceptible to known evaluation pathologies, such as over-reliance on likelihood. We introduce ContrastScore, a contrastive evaluation paradigm that builds on the widely used BARTScore formulation by comparing token-level probabilities between a stronger and a weaker model. Instead of relying on single-model likelihoods or prompt-based judgments, ContrastScore captures disagreement between models to better reflect confidence and uncertainty in generation quality. Empirical results on summarization and machine translation benchmarks show that ContrastScore, instantiated with paired moderate-scale models across both Qwen and LLaMA families, consistently outperforms larger alternatives, such as Qwen 7B and LLaMA 8B, in correlation with human ratings. In addition to improving evaluation quality, ContrastScore significantly reduces susceptibility to likelihood bias, offering a more robust and cost-effective alternative to larger LLM-based evaluation methods.

Downloads

Next from IJCNLP-AACL 2025

SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES