China

In the rapidly expanding streaming media landscape, engaging Promotional Introduction Texts (PIT) are essential for attracting viewers to various forms of media arts, such as movies and comics. Traditionally, these texts are manually written, leading to inconsistencies in quality and higher production costs. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing an end-to-end framework for automatically generating attractive PITs directly from storylines. However, currently, there is insufficient data and a lack of evaluation methods specifically designed for PIT generation. We constructed a dataset of 263 storylines extracted from Japanese media arts and their associated PITs. Using the dataset, We evaluated generations of six large language models by manual evaluation and automated evaluation (GPT-4) on attractiveness, consistency, and quality. Results demonstrated that there are trade-offs between generating attractive texts and maintaining the storyline, and achieving both objectives at the same time is a challenging task. We also find that there is a significant gap between automatic evaluation and human evaluation.

EMNLP 2025

On Generating Consistent and Attractive Promotional Introduction Text for Narrative Media Arts

workshop paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Workload traces are essential to understand complex computer systems' behavior and manage processing and memory resources. Since real-world traces are hard to obtain, synthetic trace generation is a promising alternative. This paper proposes a first-of-a-kind approach that relies on training a large language model (LLM) to generate synthetic workload traces, specifically microservice call graphs. To capture complex and arbitrary hierarchical structures and implicit constraints in such traces, we show how to fine-tune LLMs to generate recursively, making call graph generation a sequence of easier steps. To further enforce learning constraints in traces and generate uncommon situations, we argue for applying additional instruction tuning steps to align our model with the desired trace features. Our evaluation results show that we can generate diverse realistic traces under various conditions and outperform existing methods in accuracy and validity. We demonstrate that our synthetically generated traces can effectively replace real data to optimize important microservice management tasks. Additionally, our model adapts to downstream trace-related tasks, such as predicting key trace features and infilling missing data.

Large Language Models as Realistic Microservice Trace Generators

Personalization is essential for question answering systems that are user-centric. Despite its importance, personalization in answer generation has been relatively underexplored. This is mainly due to lack of resources for training and evaluating personalized question answering systems. We address this gap by introducing LaMP-QA---a benchmark designed for evaluating personalized long-form answer generation. The benchmark covers questions from three major categories: (1) Arts & Entertainment, (2) Lifestyle & Personal Development, and (3) Society & Culture, encompassing over 45 subcategories in total. To assess the quality and potential impact of the LaMP-QA benchmark for personalized question answering, we conduct comprehensive human and automatic evaluations, to compare multiple evaluation strategies for evaluating generated personalized responses and measure their alignment with human preferences. Furthermore, we benchmark a number of non-personalized and personalized approaches based on open-source and proprietary large language models (LLMs). Our results show that incorporating the personalized context provided leads to performance improvements of up to 39%. The benchmark is publicly released to support future research in this area.

LaMP-QA: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Question Answering

Multimodal question answering (QA) often requires identifying which video, audio, or sensor tokens are relevant to the question. Yet modality disagreements are common: off-camera speech, background noise, or motion outside the field of view often mislead fusion models that weight all streams equally. We present RAVEN, a unified QA architecture whose core is QuART, a query-conditioned cross-modal gating module that assigns scalar relevance scores to each token across modalities, enabling the model to amplify informative signals and suppress distractors before fusion. RAVEN is trained through a three-stage pipeline comprising unimodal pretraining, query-aligned fusion, and disagreement-oriented fine-tuning - each stage targeting a distinct challenge in multi-modal reasoning: representation quality, cross-modal relevance, and robustness to modality mismatch. To support training and evaluation, we release AVS-QA, a dataset of 300K synchronized Audio-Video-Sensor streams paired with automatically generated question-answer pairs. Experimental results on seven multi-modal QA benchmarks - including egocentric and exocentric tasks - show that RAVEN achieves up to 14.5% and 8.0% gains in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art multi-modal large language models, respectively. Incorporating sensor data provides an additional 16.4% boost, and the model remains robust under modality corruption, outperforming SOTA baselines by 50.23%. Our code and dataset are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RAVEN/.

RAVEN: Query-Guided Representation Alignment for Question Answering over Audio, Video, Embedded Sensors, and Natural Language

In this work, we present sequence-driven structural causal models (SD-SCMs), a framework for specifying causal models with user-defined structure and language-model-defined mechanisms. We characterize how an SD-SCM enables sampling from observational, interventional, and counterfactual distributions according to the desired causal structure. We then leverage this procedure to propose a new type of benchmark for causal inference methods, generating individual-level counterfactual data to test treatment effect estimation. We create an example benchmark consisting of thousands of datasets, and test a suite of popular estimation methods for average, conditional average, and individual treatment effect estimation. We find under this benchmark that (1) causal methods outperform non-causal methods and that (2) even state-of-the-art methods struggle with individualized effect estimation, suggesting this benchmark captures some inherent difficulties in causal estimation. Apart from generating data, this same technique can underpin the auditing of language models for (un)desirable causal effects, such as misinformation or discrimination. We believe SD-SCMs can serve as a useful tool in any application that would benefit from sequential data with controllable causal structure.

Language Models as Causal Effect Generators

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, but controlling their behavior reliably remains challenging, especially in open-ended generation settings. This paper introduces a novel supervised steering approach that operates in sparse, interpretable representation spaces. We employ sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to obtain sparse latent representations that aim to disentangle semantic attributes from model activations. Then we train linear classifiers to identify a small subspace of task-relevant dimensions in latent representations. Finally, we learn supervised steering vectors constrained to this subspace, optimized to align with target behaviors. Experiments across sentiment, truthfulness, and politics polarity steering tasks with multiple LLMs demonstrate that our supervised steering vectors achieve higher success rates with minimal degradation in generation quality compared to existing methods. Further analysis reveals that a notably small subspace is sufficient for effective steering, enabling more targeted and interpretable interventions.

SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language Models

Recent advancements in large language model (LLM) agents have significantly accelerated scientific discovery automation, yet concurrently raised critical ethical and safety concerns. To systematically address these challenges, we introduce SafeScientist, an innovative AI scientist framework explicitly designed to enhance safety and ethical responsibility in AI-driven scientific exploration. SafeScientist proactively refuses ethically inappropriate or high-risk tasks and rigorously emphasizes safety throughout the research process. To achieve comprehensive safety oversight, we integrate multiple defensive mechanisms, including prompt monitoring, agent-collaboration monitoring, tool-use monitoring, and an ethical reviewer component. Complementing SafeScientist, we propose SciSafetyBench, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate AI safety in scientific contexts, comprising 240 high-risk scientific tasks across 6 domains, alongside 30 specially designed scientific tools and 120 tool-related risk tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SafeScientist significantly improves safety performance by 35% compared to traditional AI scientist frameworks, without compromising scientific output quality. Additionally, we rigorously validate the robustness of our safety pipeline against diverse adversarial attack methods, further confirming the effectiveness of our integrated approach. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive or harmful.

SafeScientist: Enhancing AI Scientist Safety for Risk-Aware Scientific Discovery

The Latin script is often used to informally write languages with non-Latin native scripts. In many cases (e.g., most languages in India), the lack of conventional spelling in the Latin script results in high spelling variability. Such romanization renders languages that are normally easily distinguished due to being written in different scripts – Hindi and Urdu, for example – highly confusable. In this work, we increase language identification (LID) accuracy for romanized text by improving the methods used to synthesize training sets. We find that training on synthetic samples which incorporate natural spelling variation yields higher LID system accuracy than including available naturally occurring examples in the training set, or even training higher capacity models. We demonstrate new state-of-the-art LID performance on romanized text from 20 Indic languages in the Bhasha-Abhijnaanam evaluation set (Madhani et al., 2023a), improving test F1 from the reported 74.7% (using a pretrained neural model) to 85.4% using a linear classifier trained solely on synthetic data and 88.2% when also training on available harvested text.

Improving Informally Romanized Language Identification

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has opened new opportunities for cre- ating dynamic NPCs in gaming environments, enabling both functional task execution and persona-consistent dialogue generation. In this paper, we (Tu_Character_lab) report our participation in the Commonsense Persona- Grounded Dialogue Challenge (CPDC) 2025 Round 2. which evaluates agents across three tracks: task-oriented dialogue, context-aware dialogue, and their integration. Our ap- proach combines two complementary strate- gies: (i) lightweight prompting techniques in the API track, including a Deflanderization prompt- ing method to suppress excessive role-play and improve task fidelity, and (ii) fine-tuned large models in the GPU track, leveraging Qwen3-14B with supervised finetuning (SFT) and LoRA adaptation. Our best submissions ranked 2nd on Task 1, 2nd on Task 3 (API track), and 4th on Task 3 (GPU track).

Deflanderization for Game Dialogue: Balancing Character Authenticity with Task Execution in LLM-based NPCs

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly serve as role-playing agents, yet their ability to consistently portray version-specific characters, such as superhero from different comic or movie universes, remains underexplored. Superhero universes such as Marvel and DC offer a uniquely rich and interesting testbed: decades of narratives define multiple incarnations of the same character, each with distinct histories, values, and moral codes. To study this challenge, we introduce Beyond One World, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on character-based role-playing across 30 iconic heroes and 90 specific versions. The benchmark contains two tasks: (i) Canon Events, probing factual recall of pivotal life stages, and (ii) Moral Dilemmas, confronting models with ethically charged scenarios. Responses are scored for both accuracy and reasoning fidelity using a framework that distinguishes internal deliberation (thinking) from external actions (acting). We propose a Think–Act Matching metric to quantify alignment between reasoning and action, potentially indicating model trustworthiness. Experimental results across reasoning and non-reasoning models reveal three key findings: (1) chain-of-thought prompting improves coherence in weaker models but can reduce canonical accuracy in stronger ones; (2) cross-character generalization across versions remains a significant obstacle; and (3) models often excel in either thinking or acting but rarely both. Beyond One World highlights critical gaps in multiversal consistency and reasoning alignment, providing a new and challenging role-playing LLM evaluation.

Beyond One World: Benchmarking Super Heros in Role-Playing Across Multiversal Contexts

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly tested in strategic decision-making tasks, yet most evaluations focus on their ability to approximate equilibrium solutions rather than how closely they resemble human behavior. We study instead the alignment of LLM with human common sense reasoning by letting agents play in three classic game-theoretic settings: rock–paper–scissors, the centipede game, and the traveler’s dilemma, where human strategies are known to diverge from theoretical predictions. We argue that such games provide a simple, controlled testbed for probing the gap between human and machine reasoning in strategic contexts. The preliminary results presented in this extended abstract, show a partial alignment with human reasoning in some settings.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Large Language Models as Realistic Microservice Trace Generators

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES