China

We ask whether contemporary LLMs are able to perform natural language inference (NLI) tasks on mathematical texts. We call this the Math NLI problem. We construct a corpus of Math NLI pairs whose premises are from extant mathematical text and whose hypotheses and gold labels were provided by people with experience in both research-level mathematics and also in the NLI field. We also investigate the quality of corpora using the same premises but whose hypotheses are provided by LLMs themselves. We not only investigate the performance but also the inter-group consistency of the diverse group of LLMs. We have both positive and negative findings. Among our positive findings: in some settings, using a majority vote of LLMs is approximately equivalent to using human-labeled data in the Math NLI area. On the negative side: LLMs still struggle with mathematical language. They occasionally fail at even basic inferences. Current models are not as prone to hypothesis-only ``inference&#39;&#39; in our data the way the previous generation had been. In addition to our findings, we also provide our corpora as data to support future work on Math NLI.

EMNLP 2025

Math Natural Language Inference: this should be easy!

We ask whether contemporary LLMs are able to perform natural language inference (NLI) tasks on mathematical texts. We call this the Math NLI problem. We construct a corpus of Math NLI pairs whose premises are from extant mathematical text and whose hypotheses and gold labels were provided by people with experience in both research-level mathematics and also in the NLI field. We also investigate the quality of corpora using the same premises but whose hypotheses are provided by LLMs themselves. We not only investigate the performance but also the inter-group consistency of the diverse group of LLMs. We have both positive and negative findings. Among our positive findings: in some settings, using a majority vote of LLMs is approximately equivalent to using human-labeled data in the Math NLI area. On the negative side: LLMs still struggle with mathematical language. They occasionally fail at even basic inferences. Current models are not as prone to hypothesis-only ``inference'' in our data the way the previous generation had been. In addition to our findings, we also provide our corpora as data to support future work on Math NLI.

workshop paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

To study computational models for language acquisition, we propose an interactive computational framework that utilizes a miniature language acquisition dataset in a controlled environment. In this framework, a neural learner model interacts with a teacher model that provides corrective feedback. Within this framework, we investigate various corrective feedback strategies, specifically focusing on reformulations and their effect on the learner model during their interactions. We design experimental settings to evaluate the learner's production of syntactically and semantically correct linguistic utterances and perception of concepts and word-meaning associations.
These results offer insights into the effectiveness of different feedback strategies in language acquisition using artificial neural networks. The outcome of this research is establishing a framework with a dataset for the systematic evaluation of various aspects of language acquisition in a controlled environment.

Modeling Language Learning in Corrective Feedback Interactions

Antonymy has long received particular attention in lexical semantics.
Previous studies have shown that antonym pairs frequently co-occur in text, across genres and parts of speech, more often than would be expected by chance. However, whether this co-occurrence pattern is distinctive of antonymy remains unclear, due to a lack of comparison with other semantic relations. This work fills the gap by comparing antonymy with three other relations across parts of speech using robust co-occurrence metrics. We find that antonymy is distinctive in three respects: antonym pairs co-occur with high strength, in a preferred linear order, and within short spans. All results are available online.

On the Distinctive Co-occurrence Characteristics of Antonymy

We introduce and explore the concept of potentially problematic word usages (PPWUs): word occurrences that are likely to cause communication breakdowns of a semantic nature. While much research has been devoted to lexical complexity, ambiguity, vagueness and related issues, no work has attempted to fully capture the intricate nature of PPWUs. We review linguistic factors, datasets and metrics that can be helpful for PPWU detection. We also discuss challenges to their study, such as their complexity and subjectivity, and highlight the need for future work on this phenomenon.

Potentially Problematic Word Usages and How to Detect Them: A Survey

While supervised relation extraction (RE) models have considerably advanced the state-of-the-art, they often perform poorly in low-resource settings. Zero-shot RE is vital when annotations are not available either due to costs or time constraints. As a result, zero-shot RE has garnered interest in the research community. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) many approaches have been proposed for prompting LLMs for RE, but these methods often either rely on an accompanying small language model (e.g., for finetuning on synthetic data generated by LLMs) or require complex post-prompt processing. In this paper, we propose an effective prompt-based method that does not require any additional resources. Instead, we use an LLM to perform a two-step process. In the first step, we perform a targeted summarization of the text with respect to the underlying relation, reduce the applicable label space, and synthesize examples. Then, we combine the products of these processes with other elements into a final prompt. We evaluate our approach with various LLMs on four real-world RE datasets. Our evaluation shows that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art zero-shot methods by a large margin. This work can also be considered as a new strong baseline for zero-shot RE that is compatible with any LLM.

Relation-Aware Prompting Makes Large Language Models Effective Zero-shot Relation Extractors

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems rely on high-quality embeddings to retrieve relevant context for large language models. This paper introduces the Semantic-Augmented Graph (SAG), a new architecture that improves domain-specific embeddings by capturing hierarchical semantic relationships between text segments. Inspired by human information processing, SAG organizes content from general to specific concepts using a graph-based structure. By combining static embeddings with dynamic semantic graphs, it generates context-aware representations that reflect both lexical and conceptual links. Experiments on text similarity and domain-specific question answering show that SAG consistently outperforms standard embedding methods within RAG pipelines.

SAG: Enhancing Domain-Specific Information Retrieval with Semantic-Augmented Graphs

Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) is essential for improving human-computer interaction, yet its accuracy remains constrained by the complexity of emotional nuances in speech. In this study, we distinguish between $descriptive\ semantics$, which represents the contextual content of speech, and $expressive\ semantics$, which reflects the speaker's emotional state. After watching emotionally charged movie segments, we recorded audio clips of participants describing their experiences, along with the intended emotion tags for each clip, participants' self-rated emotional responses, and their valence/arousal scores. Through experiments we show that descriptive semantics align with intended emotions, while expressive semantics correlate with evoked emotions. Our findings inform SER applications in human-AI interaction and pave the way for more context-aware AI systems.

Semantic Differentiation in Speech Emotion Recognition: Insights from Descriptive and Expressive Speech Roles

Semantic prosody is a collocational meaning formed through the co-occurrence of a linguistic unit and a consistent series of collocates, which should be treated separately from semantic meaning. Since words that are literal translation of each other may have different semantic prosody, more attention should be paid to this linguistic property in order to generate accurate translation. However, current machine translation models cannot handle this problem. To bridge the gap, we propose an approach to teach machine translation models about semantic prosody of a specific structure. We focus on Chinese BEI passives and create a dataset of English-Chinese sentence pairs with the purpose of demonstrating the negative semantic prosody of BEI passives. Then we fine-tune OPUS-MT, NLLB-600M and mBART50-mmt models with our dataset for the English-Chinese translation task. Our results show that fine-tuned MT models perform better on using BEI passives for translating unfavourable content and avoid using it for neutral and favourable content. Also, in NLLB-600M, which is a multilingual model, this knowledge of semantic prosody can be transferred from English-Chinese translation to other language pairs, such as Spanish-Chinese.

Semantic Prosody in Machine Translation: the English-Chinese Case of Passive Structures

Large language models (LLMs) excel at general language tasks but often struggle with event-based questions—especially those requiring causal or temporal reasoning. We introduce TAG-EQA (Text-And-Graph for Event Question Answering), a prompting framework that injects causal event graphs into LLM inputs by converting structured relations into natural-language statements. TAG-EQA spans nine prompting configurations, combining three strategies (zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought) with three input modalities (text-only, graph-only, text+graph), enabling a systematic analysis of when and how structured knowledge aids inference. On the TORQUESTRA benchmark, TAG-EQA improves accuracy by ~5% on average over text-only baselines, with gains up to ~12% in zero-shot settings and ~18% when graph-augmented CoT prompting is effective. While performance varies by model and configuration, our findings show that causal graphs can enhance event reasoning in LLMs without fine-tuning, offering a flexible way to encode structure in prompt-based QA.

TAG–EQA: Text–And–Graph for Event Question Answering via Structured Prompting Strategies

Large language models have demonstrated varying levels of competence across a range of reasoning tasks, but coarse-grained evaluations often do not reflect their specific strengths and weaknesses, particularly in complex tasks such as Narrative Question Answering. In this paper, we advocate for a multi-dimensional skill-based evaluation that assesses models across distinct core skill dimensions. Our proposed skill-focused evaluation framework offers a granular and more realistic measure of model performance, revealing targeted areas for improvement and guiding future development. Experiments on Narrative Question Answering demonstrate that dimension-level analysis captures the multifaceted nature of the task and informs more effective model evaluation.

Towards Evaluation of Language Models with Skill Dimensions: A Case Study on Narrative Question Answering

This work explores the impact of dataset quality and composition on Word-in-Context performance for Galician and Spanish. We assess existing datasets, validate their test sets, and create new manually constructed evaluation data. Across five experiments with controlled variations in training and test data, we find that while the validation of test data tends to yield better model performance, evaluations on manually created datasets suggest that contextual embeddings are not sufficient on their own to reliably capture word meaning variation. Regarding training data, our results suggest that performance is influenced not only by size and human validation but also by deeper factors related to the semantic properties of the datasets. All new resources will be freely released.

Premium content

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Modeling Language Learning in Corrective Feedback Interactions

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES