China

Handwritten text recognition aims to convert visual input into machine-readable text, and it remains challenging due to the evolving and context-dependent nature of handwriting. Character sets change over time, and character frequency distributions shift across historical periods or regions, often causing models trained on broad, heterogeneous corpora to underperform on specific subsets. To tackle this, we propose a novel loss function that incorporates the Wasserstein distance between the character frequency distribution of the predicted text and a target distribution empirically derived from training data. By penalizing divergence from expected distributions, our approach enhances both accuracy and robustness under temporal and contextual intra-dataset shifts. Furthermore, we demonstrate that character distribution alignment can also improve existing models at inference time without requiring retraining by integrating it as a scoring function in a guided decoding scheme. Experimental results across multiple datasets and architectures confirm the effectiveness of our method in boosting generalization and performance.

EMNLP 2025

Learning to Align: Addressing Character Frequency Distribution Shifts in Handwritten Text Recognition

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Do moral values align between images and the fictional stories about them, within human narratives and between humans and large language models (LLMs)? This question matters because stories are central to how humans communicate moral values, yet little is known about how people and LLMs perform this task in a multimodal (text and image) setting. We present a systematic comparison of moral values represented in human- and LLM-generated narratives based on images annotated by humans for moral content. Our analysis shows that while human stories reflect a balanced distribution of moral foundations and coherent narrative arcs, LLMs disproportionately emphasize the Care foundation and often lack emotional resolution. Even with moral conditioning, these biases persist. We introduce a novel dataset and framework for evaluating moral storytelling in vision-language models, highlighting key challenges in aligning AI with human moral reasoning across cultures.

Tales of Morality: Comparing Human- and LLM-Generated Moral Stories from Visual Cues

Large vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle to generate long and factual captions. However, traditional measures for hallucination and factuality are not well suited for evaluating longer, more diverse captions and in settings where ground-truth human-annotated captions are unavailable. We introduce OVFact, a novel method for measuring caption factuality of long captions that leverages open-vocabulary visual grounding and tool-based verification without depending on human annotations. Our method improves agreement with human judgements and captures both caption descriptiveness (recall) and factual precision in the same metric. Furthermore, unlike previous metrics, our reference-free method design enables new applications towards factuality-based data filtering. We observe models trained on an OVFact-filtered (2.5-5x less) subset of a large-scale, noisy (VLM-generated) pretraining set meaningfully improve factuality precision without sacrificing caption descriptiveness across a range of downstream long caption benchmarks.

OVFact: Measuring and Improving Open-Vocabulary Factuality for Long Caption Models

With the growing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) for open-ended tasks, accurately assessing epistemic uncertainty, which reflects a model’s lack of knowledge, has become crucial to ensuring reliable outcomes. However, quantifying epistemic uncertainty in such tasks is challenging due to the presence of aleatoric uncertainty, which arises from multiple valid answers. While bias can introduce noise into epistemic uncertainty estimation, it may also reduce noise from aleatoric uncertainty. To investigate this trade-off, we conduct experiments on Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks and find that mitigating prompt-introduced bias improves uncertainty quantification in GPT-4o. Building on prior work showing that LLMs tend to copy input information when model confidence is low, we further analyze how these prompt biases affect measured epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty across varying bias-free confidence levels with GPT-4o and Qwen2-VL. We find that all considered biases induce greater changes in both uncertainties when bias-free model confidence is lower. Moreover, lower bias-free model confidence leads to greater underestimation of epistemic uncertainty (i.e. overconfidence) due to bias, whereas it has no significant effect on the direction of changes in aleatoric uncertainty estimation. These distinct effects deepen our understanding of bias mitigation for uncertainty quantification and potentially inform the development of more advanced techniques.

The Role of Model Confidence on Bias Effects in Measured Uncertainties for Vision-Language Models

Recent works began to automate the design of agentic systems using meta-agents that propose and iteratively refine new agent architectures. In this paper, we examine three key challenges in a common class of meta-agents. \emph{First}, we investigate how a meta-agent learns across iterations and find that simply expanding the context with all previous agents, as proposed by previous works, performs worse than ignoring prior designs entirely. We show that the performance improves with an evolutionary approach. \emph{Second}, although the meta-agent designs multiple agents during training, it typically commits to a single agent at test time. We find that the designed agents have low behavioral diversity, limiting the potential for their complementary use. \emph{Third}, we assess when automated design is economically viable. We find that only in a few cases—specifically, two datasets—the overall cost of designing and deploying the agents is lower than that of human-designed agents when deployed on over 15,000 examples. In contrast, the performance gains for other datasets do not justify the design cost, regardless of scale.

Inefficiencies of Meta Agents for Agent Design

Subword tokenizers trained on multilingual corpora naturally produce overlapping tokens across languages. Does token overlap facilitate cross‑lingual transfer or instead introduce interference between languages? Prior work offers mixed evidence, partly due to varied setups and confounders, such as subword segmentation granularity or token frequency. To address this question, we devise a controlled experiment where we train bilingual autoregressive models on multiple language pairs under systematically varied vocabulary overlap settings. Crucially, we explore a new dimension to understanding how overlap affects transfer, namely the impact of semantically similar tokens shared across languages. We first analyze our models' hidden representations and find that overlap *of any kind* creates embedding spaces that capture cross-lingual semantic relationships, while this effect is much weaker in models with disjoint vocabularies. When testing cross-lingual transfer on downstream tasks, we find that models with overlap outperform models with disjoint vocabularies, and that transfer performance generally improves as overlap increases. Overall, our findings highlight the advantages of token overlap in multilingual models and show that substantial shared vocabulary remains a beneficial design choice for multilingual tokenizers.

False Friends Are Not Foes: Investigating Vocabulary Overlap in Multilingual Language Models

Designing effective prompts is essential to guiding large language models (LLMs) toward desired responses. Automated prompt engineering aims to reduce reliance on manual efforts by streamlining the design, refinement, and optimization of natural language prompts. This paper proposes an optimal learning framework for automated prompt engineering for black-box models, designed to sequentially identify effective prompt features under limited evaluation budgets. We introduce a feature-based method to express prompt templates, which significantly broadens the search space. Bayesian regression is employed to utilize correlations among similar prompts, accelerating the learning process. To efficiently explore the large space of prompt features, we adopt the forward-looking Knowledge-Gradient (KG) policy for sequential optimal learning efficiently by solving mixed-integer second-order cone optimization problems, making it scalable and capable of accommodating prompts characterized only through constraints. Our method significantly outperforms a set of benchmark strategies assessed on instruction induction tasks within limited iterations of prompt evaluations, showing the potential of optimal learning for efficient prompt learning.

SOPL: A Sequential Optimal Learning Approach to Automated Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models

As autonomous agents and assistants, large language models (LLMs) often struggle with "hallucinations." Fundamentally, the problem is one of prioritization and balance: the LLM needs to understand or infer when it needs to be creative and balance that with its need to be accurate. Most efforts focus on either updating intrinsic knowledge via targeted post-training or by adding external knowledge sources which the LLM can reference neurosymbolically (e.g., via retrieval-augmented generation). However, these all eventually rely on the LLM's implicit reasoning ability during generation, still allowing for these random hallucinations despite high-quality training examples and references. Using aspect-oriented summarization as a case study, we propose **LOgit REwriting**(**LORE**), a new controlled generation paradigm which can simultaneously be faithful to external knowledge and to the LLM's intentions. LORE works by adding a rewriting module at left-to-right inference time, continuously reflecting on the newest prediction and trying to find a replacement that is more faithful to the source document. Then, it merges the logits of the replacement with those of the original prediction to generate the next token. We created a new long-context aspect-oriented summarization dataset, **SLPAspect**, and find that LORE generates 5.8% better summaries compared to the LLM without LORE-rewriting. All code and data from this paper will be available on GitHub after the anonymity period.

LORE: Continual Logit Rewriting Fosters Faithful Generation

Many applications that modern large language models (LLMs) are deployed on are retrieval tasks: the answer can be recovered from context and success is a matter of learning generalizable features from data. However, this is easier said than done. Overparametrized models trained on cross-entropy loss can overfit on noise. We argue that such overfitting is prone to happen when the model can identify mechanisms that rapidly drive down the loss of certain tokens early on in training. Fitting some tokens early reduce gradient signals in later iterations, as such, remaining tokens are more vulnerable to noise overfitting. We dub this phenomenon unequal learning and show that LLMs with longer contexts or larger embedding sizes are prone to this failure mode. In this work, we argue that learning training samples at an equal rate helps counter such biases. We highlight two mechanisms that promote equal learning: (i) loss functions that regularize uniform margins across training samples, (ii) small learning rates (e.g. by warming up) at the start of training. We demonstrate these approaches on various synthetic and natural language datasets.

Learning Is Not A Race: Improving Retrieval in Language Models via Equal Learning

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a key safeguard for large language models, especially when they're deployed in real-world applications. However, existing OOD methods often struggle with prompts that are deliberately obfuscated, context-dependent, or superficially benign—making it hard to distinguish between harmless queries and adversarial or dangerous ones. These methods typically assess prompts in isolation, missing important semantic cues from the model's response. We introduce PROOD, prompt-response OOD detection, a framework that jointly analyzes LLM prompts *and their corresponding outputs* to improve semantic understanding. PROOD supports zero-shot multiclass detection using synthetic data generation and it offers a tunable probabilistic classification output. We validate PROOD on three challenging benchmarks—TrustLLM, OR-Bench, and AdvBench—where consistently outperforms prior OOD techniques, improving F1 scores by up to 6.3 points, from 0.871 to 0.934. Our results show that incorporating model responses enables more accurate, context-aware OOD detection in complex and adversarial prompt environments.

PROOD: A Simple LLM Out-of-Distribution Guardrail Leveraging Response Semantics

Despite the success of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in recent years, prompt design for LMMs in Multiple‑Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remains poorly understood. We show that even minor variations in prompt phrasing and structure can lead to accuracy deviations of up to 15% for certain prompts and models. This variability poses a challenge for transparent and fair LMM evaluation, as models often report their best-case performance using carefully selected prompts. To address this, we introduce **Promptception**, a systematic framework for evaluating prompt sensitivity in LMMs. It consists of 61 prompt types, spanning 15 categories and 6 supercategories, each targeting specific aspects of prompt formulation, and is used to evaluate 10 LMMs ranging from lightweight open‑source models to GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, across 3 MCQA benchmarks: MMStar, MMMU‑Pro, MVBench. Our findings reveal that proprietary models exhibit greater sensitivity to prompt phrasing, reflecting tighter alignment with instruction semantics, while open‑source models are steadier but struggle with nuanced and complex phrasing. Based on this analysis, we propose Prompting Principles tailored to proprietary and open-source LMMs, enabling more robust and fair model evaluation.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Tales of Morality: Comparing Human- and LLM-Generated Moral Stories from Visual Cues

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES