China

Despite significant progress in multimodal language models (LMs), it remains unclear whether visual grounding enhances their understanding of embodied knowledge compared to text-only models. To address this question, we propose a novel embodied knowledge understanding benchmark based on the perceptual theory from psychology, encompassing visual, auditory, tactile, gustatory, olfactory external senses, and interoception. The benchmark assesses the models&#39; perceptual abilities across different sensory modalities through vector comparison and question-answering tasks with over 1,700 questions. By comparing 30 state-of-the-art LMs, we surprisingly find that vision-language models (VLMs) do not outperform text-only models in either task. Moreover, the models perform significantly worse in the visual dimension compared to other sensory dimensions. Further analysis reveals that the vector representations are easily influenced by word form and frequency, and the models struggle to answer questions involving spatial perception and reasoning. Our findings underscore the need for more effective integration of embodied knowledge in LMs to enhance their understanding of the physical world.

EMNLP 2025

Does Visual Grounding Enhance the Understanding of Embodied Knowledge in Large Language Models?

Despite significant progress in multimodal language models (LMs), it remains unclear whether visual grounding enhances their understanding of embodied knowledge compared to text-only models. To address this question, we propose a novel embodied knowledge understanding benchmark based on the perceptual theory from psychology, encompassing visual, auditory, tactile, gustatory, olfactory external senses, and interoception. The benchmark assesses the models' perceptual abilities across different sensory modalities through vector comparison and question-answering tasks with over 1,700 questions. By comparing 30 state-of-the-art LMs, we surprisingly find that vision-language models (VLMs) do not outperform text-only models in either task. Moreover, the models perform significantly worse in the visual dimension compared to other sensory dimensions. Further analysis reveals that the vector representations are easily influenced by word form and frequency, and the models struggle to answer questions involving spatial perception and reasoning. Our findings underscore the need for more effective integration of embodied knowledge in LMs to enhance their understanding of the physical world.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Test-Time Scaling (TTS) has proven effective in improving the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference. However, existing research has overlooked the efficiency of TTS from a latency-sensitive perspective. Through a latency-aware evaluation of representative TTS methods, we demonstrate that a compute-optimal TTS does not always result in the lowest latency in scenarios where latency is critical. To address this gap and achieve latency-optimal TTS, we propose two key approaches by optimizing the concurrency configurations: (1) branch-wise parallelism, which leverages multiple concurrent inference branches, and (2) sequence-wise parallelism, enabled by speculative decoding. By integrating these two approaches and allocating computational resources properly to each, our latency-optimal TTS enables a 32B model to reach 82.3% accuracy on MATH-500 within 1 minute and a smaller 3B model to achieve 72.4% within 10 seconds. Our work emphasizes the importance of latency-aware TTS and demonstrates its ability to deliver both speed and accuracy in latency-sensitive scenarios.

Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scaling

Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) significantly impedes their real-world applicability. As the primary component for accurately interpreting visual information, the choice of visual encoder is pivotal. We hypothesize that the diverse training paradigms employed by different visual encoders instill them with distinct inductive biases, which leads to their diverse hallucination performances. Existing benchmarks typically focus on coarse-grained hallucination detection and fail to capture the diverse hallucinations elaborated in our hypothesis. To systematically analyze these effects, we introduce VHBench-10, a comprehensive benchmark with approximately 10,000 samples for evaluating LVLMs across ten fine-grained hallucination categories. Our evaluations confirm encoders exhibit unique hallucination characteristics. Building on these insights and the suboptimality of simple feature fusion, we propose VisionWeaver, a novel Context-Aware Routing Network. It employs global visual features to generate routing signals, dynamically aggregating visual features from multiple specialized experts. Comprehensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of VisionWeaver in significantly reducing hallucinations and improving overall model performance.

Diving into Mitigating Hallucinations from a Vision Perspective for Large Vision-Language Models

Recent work on language models often applies reinforcement learning with human-annotated preference data to enhance specific capabilities, such as generating informative summaries. However, such data often focuses on overall preferences and overlooks factuality. Since collecting new annotations is costly, we propose to use automatic factuality metrics to obtain factuality preference labels. While individual factuality metrics are limited, their combination can effectively capture diverse factual errors. We introduce an automated training pipeline that improves summarisation factuality via preference optimisation. For each source document, we generate lexically similar summary pairs by varying decoding strategies, ensuring the model learns from minor factual errors. To avoid human annotation, we derive preference labels from weak factuality metrics filtering out conflicting cases to improve reliability. This results in a high-quality preference dataset constructed with only source documents. Experiments show consistent factuality gains across models, ranging from early encoder-decoder architectures to modern large language models, with smaller models reaching comparable factuality to larger ones. Code and data will be released upon acceptance.

Optimising Factual Consistency in Summarisation via Preference Learning from Multiple Imperfect Metrics

Metaphorical language is prevalent in everyday communication, often used unconsciously, as in "rising crime.'' While LLMs excel at identifying metaphors in text, they struggle with downstream tasks that implicitly require correct metaphor interpretation, such as natural language inference (NLI). This work explores how LLMs perform on NLI with metaphorical input. Particularly, we investigate whether incorporating conceptual metaphors (source and target domains) enhances performance in zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our contributions are two-fold: (1) we extend metaphorical texts in an existing NLI dataset by source and target domains, and (2) we conduct an ablation study using Shapley values and interactions to assess the extent to which LLMs interpret metaphorical language correctly in NLI. Our results indicate that incorporating conceptual metaphors often improves task performance.

Investigating the Impact of Conceptual Metaphors on LLM-based NLI through Shapley Interactions

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in high-stakes decision-making tasks, such as loan approvals. While their applications expand across domains, LLMs struggle to process tabular data, ensuring fairness and delivering reliable predictions. In this work, we assess the performance and fairness of LLMs on serialized loan approval datasets from three geographically distinct regions: Ghana, Germany, and the United States. Our evaluation focuses on the model's zero-shot and in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. Our results reveal that the choice of serialization format significantly affects both performance and fairness in LLMs, with certain formats such as GReaT and Lift yielding higher F1 scores but exacerbating fairness disparities. Notably, while ICL improved model performance by 4.9-59.6% relative to zero-shot baselines, its effect on fairness varied considerably across datasets. Our work underscores the importance of effective tabular data representation methods and fairness-aware models to improve the reliability of LLMs in financial decision-making.

Accept or Deny? Evaluating LLM Fairness and Performance in Loan Approval across Table-to-Text Serialization Approaches

Domain adaptation is widely adopted in text retrieval scenarios where large labeled data is unavailable. To improve model adaptability, existing methods try to expand more source datasets. However, we found from experiments that indiscriminately using a large amount of source data from various text tasks does not guarantee improved adaptability, but may negatively impact model performance. To tackle this issue, we propose Trait, a framework that can effectively improve model adaptability by selecting beneficial data without evaluating all source data. Specifically, we first divide multiple source datasets into data chunks of the same size as the minimum selection unit to form the whole selection space. Then we devise an iterative process that includes Bayesian optimization-based selection and transfer-aware chunk evaluation to incrementally select beneficial chunks. To reduce unnecessary evaluation costs, we also design backtracking and pruning actions to adjust the selection subspace. Extensive experimental results show that Trait not only achieves average state-of-the-art for few-shot on nine target datasets by evaluating only 4% of BERRI source data, but also is very competitive for zero-shot compared with LLM-based rankers.

Transfer-Aware Data Selection for Domain Adaptation in Text Retrieval

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their successful application to a broad range of tasks. However, in information-intensive tasks, the prompt length can grow fast, leading to increased computational requirements, performance degradation, and induced biases from irrelevant or redundant information. Recently, various prompt compression techniques have been introduced to optimize the trade-off between reducing input length and retaining performance. We propose a holistic evaluation framework that allows for in-depth analysis of prompt compression methods. We focus on three key aspects, besides compression ratio: (i) downstream task performance, (ii) grounding in the input context, and (iii) information preservation. Using our framework, we analyze state-of-the-art soft and hard compression methods and show that some fail to preserve key details from the original prompt, limiting performance on complex tasks. By identifying these limitations, we are able to improve one soft prompting method by controlling compression granularity, achieving up to +23% in downstream performance, +8 BERTScore points in grounding, and 2.7× more entities preserved in compression. Ultimately, we find that the best effectiveness/compression rate trade-off is achieved with soft prompting combined with sequence-level training.

Understanding and Improving Information Preservation in Prompt Compression for LLMs

Commonsense reasoning in multimodal contexts remains a foundational challenge in artificial intelligence. We introduce Multimodal UNcommonsense (MUN), a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to handle scenarios that deviate from typical visual or contextual expectations. MUN pairs visual scenes with surprising or unlikely outcomes described in natural language, prompting models to either rationalize seemingly odd images using everyday logic or uncover unexpected interpretations in ordinary scenes. To support this task, we propose a retrieval-based in-context learning (R-ICL) framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from larger models to smaller ones without additional training. Leveraging a novel Multimodal Ensemble Retriever (MER), our method identifies semantically relevant exemplars even when image and text pairs are deliberately discordant. Experiments show an average improvement of 8.3% over baseline ICL methods, highlighting the effectiveness of R-ICL in low-frequency, atypical settings. MUN opens new directions for evaluating and improving visual-language models’ robustness and adaptability in real-world, culturally diverse, and non-prototypical scenarios.

Multimodal UNcommonsense: From Odd to Ordinary and Ordinary to Odd

The Transformer architecture has long dominated the development of large language models, but its quadratic complexity in sequence length presents scalability challenges. Recent advances in State Space Models, particularly Mamba series, offer a promising alternative with linear-time inference and competitive performance. While scaling model capacity via sparsification, exemplified by Mixture-of-Experts, has proven effective in reducing computation while expanding knowledge capacity, the integration of sparsification with Mamba remains largely unexplored. Existing attempts typically apply naive block-level stacking, failing to leverage Mamba’s internal structure for fine-grained sparsification. In this work, we mainly explore how to sparsify the parameters inside Mamba. We found that the effects of using sparsification strategies on parameters related to various mechanisms inside mamba are significantly different. Our proposed Mamba-MoZ framework introduces a flexible and effective sparsification mechanism inside Mamba, which can independently achieve parameter scalability and has stronger performance.

Sparsifying Mamba

Effective query expansion for web search benefits from promoting both exploration and diversity to capture multiple interpretations and facets of a query. While recent LLM-based methods improved retrieval performance and demonstrate strong domain generalization ability without additional training, they often generate narrowly focused expansions that overlook these properties due to knowledge anchoring within the model. We propose ThinkQE, a test-time query expansion framework addressing this limitation through two key components: a thinking-based expansion process that encourages deeper and comprehensive semantic exploration, and an evolving interaction strategy that iteratively refines expansions using retrieval feedback from the corpus. Experiments on diverse web search benchmarks (DL19, DL20, and BRIGHT) show ThinkQE consistently outperforms prior approaches, including training-intensive dense retrievers and rerankers.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scaling

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES