China

The advent of large reasoning models, such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1, has significantly advanced complex reasoning tasks. However, their capabilities in multilingual complex reasoning remain underexplored, with existing efforts largely focused on simpler tasks like MGSM. To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{\mmath}, a benchmark for multilingual complex reasoning spanning 374 high-quality math problems across 10 typologically diverse languages. Using \mmath, we observe that even advanced models like DeepSeek R1 exhibit substantial performance disparities across languages and suffer from a critical \textit{off-target} issue—generating responses in unintended languages. To address this, we explore strategies including prompting and training, demonstrating that reasoning in English and answering in target languages can simultaneously enhance performance and preserve target-language consistency. Our findings offer new insights and practical strategies for advancing the multilingual reasoning capabilities of large language models. Our code and data could be found at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MMATH}.

EMNLP 2025

MMATH: A Multilingual Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Workload traces are essential to understand complex computer systems' behavior and manage processing and memory resources. Since real-world traces are hard to obtain, synthetic trace generation is a promising alternative. This paper proposes a first-of-a-kind approach that relies on training a large language model (LLM) to generate synthetic workload traces, specifically microservice call graphs. To capture complex and arbitrary hierarchical structures and implicit constraints in such traces, we show how to fine-tune LLMs to generate recursively, making call graph generation a sequence of easier steps. To further enforce learning constraints in traces and generate uncommon situations, we argue for applying additional instruction tuning steps to align our model with the desired trace features. Our evaluation results show that we can generate diverse realistic traces under various conditions and outperform existing methods in accuracy and validity. We demonstrate that our synthetically generated traces can effectively replace real data to optimize important microservice management tasks. Additionally, our model adapts to downstream trace-related tasks, such as predicting key trace features and infilling missing data.

Large Language Models as Realistic Microservice Trace Generators

Personalization is essential for question answering systems that are user-centric. Despite its importance, personalization in answer generation has been relatively underexplored. This is mainly due to lack of resources for training and evaluating personalized question answering systems. We address this gap by introducing LaMP-QA---a benchmark designed for evaluating personalized long-form answer generation. The benchmark covers questions from three major categories: (1) Arts & Entertainment, (2) Lifestyle & Personal Development, and (3) Society & Culture, encompassing over 45 subcategories in total. To assess the quality and potential impact of the LaMP-QA benchmark for personalized question answering, we conduct comprehensive human and automatic evaluations, to compare multiple evaluation strategies for evaluating generated personalized responses and measure their alignment with human preferences. Furthermore, we benchmark a number of non-personalized and personalized approaches based on open-source and proprietary large language models (LLMs). Our results show that incorporating the personalized context provided leads to performance improvements of up to 39%. The benchmark is publicly released to support future research in this area.

LaMP-QA: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Question Answering

Testing is essential to modern software engineering for building reliable software. Given the high costs of manually creating test cases, automated test case generation, particularly methods utilizing large language models, has become increasingly popular. These neural approaches generate semantically meaningful tests that are more maintainable compared with traditional automatic testing methods like fuzzing. However, the diversity and volume of unit tests in current datasets are limited, especially for newer but important languages. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique, FuzzAug, that introduces the benefits of fuzzing to large language models by introducing valid testing semantics and providing diverse coverage-guided inputs. Doubling the size of training datasets, FuzzAug improves the performance from the baselines significantly. This technique demonstrates the potential of introducing prior knowledge from dynamic software analysis to improve neural test generation, offering significant enhancements in neural test generation.

FuzzAug: Data Augmentation by Coverage-guided Fuzzing for Neural Test Generation

Downstream scaling laws aim to predict task performance at larger scales from pretraining losses at smaller scales. Whether this prediction should be possible is unclear: some works demonstrate that task performance follows clear linear scaling trends under transformation, whereas others point out fundamental challenges to downstream scaling laws, such as emergence and inverse scaling. In this work, we conduct a meta-analysis of existing data on downstream scaling laws, finding that close fit to linear scaling laws only occurs in a minority of cases: 39% of the time. Furthermore, seemingly benign changes to the experimental setting can completely change the scaling trend. Our analysis underscores the need to understand the conditions under which scaling laws succeed. To fully model the relationship between pretraining loss and downstream task performance, we must embrace the cases in which scaling behavior deviates from linear trends.

Scaling Laws Are Unreliable for Downstream Tasks: A Reality Check

Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping how scientific knowledge is accessed and represented. This study evaluates the extent to which popular and frontier LLMs including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro recognize scientists, benchmarking their outputs against OpenAlex and Wikipedia. Using a dataset of 100,000 physicists from OpenAlex to evaluate LLM recognition, we uncover substantial disparities: LLMs exhibit selective and inconsistent recognition patterns. Recognition correlates strongly with scholarly impact such as citations, and remains uneven across gender and geography. Women researchers, and researchers from Africa, Asia, and Latin America are significantly underrecognized. We further examine the role of training data provenance, identifying Wikipedia as a potential sources that contributes to recognition gaps. Our findings highlight how LLMs can reflect, and potentially amplify existing disparities in science, underscoring the need for more transparent and inclusive knowledge systems.

Unequal Scientific Recognition in the Age of LLMs

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in question answering (QA) tasks, but often encode biases that hinder fairness and reliability. Existing bias mitigation techniques are constrained to predefined bias categories, limiting their ability to address novel or emergent biases. To address this, we introduce Open-DeBias, a comprehensive framework for open-set bias mitigation in QA. We propose a large-scale open-set QA dataset with 473, 602 instances spanning 31 bias categories and 9, 594 subgroups to enable the detection and mitigation of both known and unseen biases. Furthermore, we propose a novel debiasing framework using adapters, a parameter efficient fine-tuning approach to mitigate existing biases while generalizing to the newer ones. Compared to the state-of-the-art BMBI method, Open-DeBias improves QA accuracy on the BBQ dataset by 48.3% and 5.2% for ambiguous and disambiguous cases, respectively. Additionally, with adapters fine-tuned on only 4.27% of total training data, our method obtains 84% accuracy on Korean BBQ, demonstrating strong language-agnostic generalization. These results demonstrate a new direction for scal027 able, adaptive bias mitigation in LLM-based QA without compromising task performance.

Open-DeBias: Toward Mitigating Open-Set Bias in Language Models

This system paper presents the DeMeVa team's approaches to the third edition of the Learning with Disagreements shared task (LeWiDi 2025; Leonardelli et al., 2025). We explore two directions: in-context learning (ICL) with large language models, where we compare example sampling strategies; and label distribution learning (LDL) methods with RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019b), where we evaluate several fine-tuning methods. Our contributions are twofold: (1) we show that ICL can effectively predict annotator-specific annotations (perspectivist annotations), and that aggregating these predictions into soft labels yields competitive performance; and (2) we argue that LDL methods are promising for soft label predictions and merit further exploration by the perspectivist community.

DeMeVa at LeWiDi-2025: Modeling Perspectives with In-Context Learning and Label Distribution Learning

Test-time scaling is a family of techniques to improve LLM outputs at inference time by performing extra computation.
To the best of our knowledge, test-time scaling has been limited to domains with verifiably correct answers, like mathematics and coding.
We transfer test-time scaling to the LeWiDi-2025 tasks to evaluate annotation disagreements.
We experiment with three test-time scaling methods: two benchmark algorithms (Model Averaging and Majority Voting), and a Best-of-N sampling method.
The two benchmark methods improve LLM performance consistently on the LeWiDi tasks, but the Best-of-N method does not.
Our experiments suggest that the Best-of-N method does not currently transfer from mathematics to 
LeWiDi tasks, and we analyze potential reasons for this gap.

BoN Appetit Team at LeWiDi-2025: Best-of-N Test-time Scaling Can Not Stomach Annotation Disagreements (Yet)

The Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi) 2025 shared task aims to model annotator disagreement through soft label distribution prediction and perspectivist evaluation, which focuses on modeling individual annotators. We adapt DisCo (Distribution from Context), a neural architecture that jointly models item-level
and annotator-level label distributions, and present detailed analysis and improvements. In this paper, we extend DisCo by introducing annotator metadata
embeddings, enhancing input representations, and multi-objective training
losses to capture disagreement patterns better. Through extensive experiments,
we demonstrate substantial improvements in both soft and perspectivist evaluation
metrics across three datasets. We also conduct in-depth calibration and error
analyses that reveal when and why disagreement-aware modeling improves.
Our findings show that disagreement can be better captured by conditioning on
annotator demographics and by optimizing directly for distributional metrics, yielding consistent improvements across datasets.

LPI-RIT at LeWiDi-2025: Improving Distributional Predictions via Metadata and Loss Reweighting with DisCo

The VariErrNLI task requires detecting the degree to which each Natural Language Inference (NLI) label is acceptable to a group of annotators. 
This paper presents an approach to VariErrNLI which incorporates measures of uncertainty, namely Semantic Entropy (SE), to model human label variation. 
Our method is based on the assumption that if two labels are plausible alternatives, then their explanations must be non-contradictory.
We measure SE over Large Language Model (LLM)-generated explanations for a given NLI label, which represents the model uncertainty over the semantic space of possible explanations for that label. 
The system employs SE scores combined with an encoding of the inputs and generated explanations, and reaches a 0.31 Manhattan distance score on the test set, ranking joint first in the soft evaluation of VariErrNLI.

Premium content

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Large Language Models as Realistic Microservice Trace Generators

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES