China

Data cleaning is a time-consuming and error-prone manual process even with modern workflow tools like OpenRefine. Here, we present AutoDCWorkflow, an LLM-based pipeline for automatically generating data-cleaning workflows. The pipeline takes a raw table coupled with a data analysis purpose, and generates a sequence of OpenRefine operations designed to produce a minimal, clean table sufficient to address the purpose. Six operations correspond to common data quality issues including format inconsistencies, type errors, and duplicates. To evaluate AutoDCWorkflow, we create a benchmark with metrics assessing answers, data, and workflow quality for 142 purposes using 96 tables across six topics. The evaluation covers three key dimensions: (1) **Purpose Answer**: can the cleaned table produce a correct answer? (2) **Column (Value)**: how closely does it match the ground truth table? (3) **Workflow (Operations)**: to what extent does the generated workflow resemble the human-curated ground truth? Experiments show that Llama 3.1, Mistral, and Gemma 2 significantly enhance data quality, outperforming the baseline across all metrics. Gemma 2-27B consistently generates high-quality tables and answers, while Gemma 2-9B excels in producing workflows that resemble human-annotated versions.

EMNLP 2025

AutoDCWorkflow: LLM-based Data Cleaning Workflow Auto-Generation and Benchmark

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Speaker verification (SV) models are increasingly integrated into security, personalization, and access control systems, yet their robustness to many real-world challenges remains inadequately benchmarked. Real-world systems can face diverse conditions, some naturally occurring, and others that may be purposely, or even maliciously created, which introduce mismatches between enrollment and test data, affecting their performance. Ideally, the effect of all of these on model performance must be benchmarked; however existing benchmarks fall short, generally evaluating only a subset of potential conditions, and missing others entirely. We introduce SVeritas, the Speaker Verification tasks benchmark suite, which evaluates the performance of speaker verification systems under an extensive variety of stressors, including ``natural'' variations such as duration, spontaneity and content of the recordings, background conditions such as noise, microphone distance, reverberation, and channel mismatches, recording condition influences such as audio bandwidth and the effect of various codecs, physical influences, such as the age and health conditions of the speaker, as well as the suspectibility of the models to spoofing and adversarial attacks. While several benchmarks do exist that each cover some of these issues, SVeritas is the first comprehensive evaluation that not only includes all of these, but also several other entirely new, but nonetheless important real-life conditions that have not previously been benchmarked. We use SVeritas to evaluate several state-of-the-art SV models and observe that while some architectures maintain stability under common distortions, they suffer substantial performance degradation in scenarios involving cross-language trials, age mismatches, and codec-induced compression. Extending our analysis across demographic subgroups, we further identify disparities in robustness across age groups, gender, and linguistic backgrounds. By standardizing evaluation under realistic and synthetic stress conditions, SVeritas enables precise diagnosis of model weaknesses and establishes a foundation for advancing equitable and reliable speaker verification systems.

SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions

Speaker verification is a typical zero-shot learning task, where inference of unseen classes is performed by comparing embeddings of test instances to known examples. The models performing inference must hence naturally generate embeddings that cluster same-class instances compactly, while maintaining separation across classes. In order to learn to do so, they are typically trained on a large number of classes (speakers), often using specialized losses. However real-world speaker datasets often lack the class diversity needed to effectively learn this in a generalizable manner. We introduce CAARMA, a class augmentation framework that addresses this problem by generating synthetic classes through data mixing in the embedding space, expanding the number of training classes. To ensure the authenticity of the synthetic classes we adopt a novel adversarial refinement mechanism that minimizes categorical distinctions between synthetic and real classes. We evaluate CAARMA on multiple speaker verification tasks, as well as other representative zero-shot comparison-based speech analysis tasks and obtain consistent improvements: our framework demonstrates a significant improvement of 8% over all baseline models. Code for CAARMA will be released.

CAARMA: Class Augmentation with Adversarial Mixup Regularization

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate data analysis through executable code generation. Yet, data science tasks often admit multiple statistically valid solutions, e.g. different modeling strategies, making it critical to understand the reasoning behind analyses, not just their outcomes. While manual review of LLM-generated code can help ensure statistical soundness, it is labor-intensive and requires expertise. A more scalable approach is to evaluate the underlying workflows—the logical plans guiding code generation. However, it remains unclear how to assess whether a LLM-generated workflow supports reproducible implementations. To address this, we present **AIRepr**, an **A**nalyst–**I**nspector framework for automatically evaluating and improving the **repr**oducibility of LLM-generated data analysis workflows. Our framework is grounded in statistical principles and supports scalable, automated assessment. We introduce two novel reproducibility-enhancing prompting strategies and benchmark them against standard prompting across 15 analyst–inspector LLM pairs and 1,032 tasks from three public benchmarks. Our findings show that workflows with higher reproducibility also yield more accurate analyses, and that reproducibility-enhancing prompts substantially improve both metrics. This work provides a foundation for more transparent, reliable, and efficient human–AI collaboration in data science. Our code is publicly available.

AIRepr: An Analyst-Inspector Framework for Evaluating Reproducibility of LLMs in Data Science

In the field of design patent analysis, traditional tasks such as patent classification and patent image retrieval heavily depend on the image data. However, patent images---typically consisting of sketches with abstract and structural elements of an invention---often fall short in conveying comprehensive visual context and semantic information. This inadequacy can lead to ambiguities in evaluation during prior art searches. Recent advancements in vision-language models, such as CLIP, offer promising opportunities for more reliable and accurate AI-driven patent analysis. In this work, we leverage CLIP models to develop a unified framework DesignCLIP for design patent applications with a large-scale dataset of U.S. design patents. To address the unique characteristics of patent data, DesignCLIP incorporates class-aware classification and contrastive learning, utilizing generated detailed captions for patent images and multi-views image learning. We validate the effectiveness of DesignCLIP across various downstream tasks, including patent classification and patent retrieval. Additionally, we explore multimodal patent retrieval, which provides the potential to enhance creativity and innovation in design by offering more diverse sources of inspiration. Our experiments show that DesignCLIP consistently outperforms baseline and SOTA models in the patent domain on all tasks. Our findings underscore the promise of multimodal approaches in advancing patent analysis. The codebase is available here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PATENTCLIP-4661/README.md.

DesignCLIP: Multimodal Learning with CLIP for Design Patent Understanding

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning, positioning them as promising tools for supporting human problem-solving. However, what happens when their performance is affected by *misinformation*, i.e., incorrect inputs introduced by users due to oversights or gaps in knowledge? Such misinformation is prevalent in real-world interactions with LLMs, yet how it propagates within LLMs’ reasoning process remains underexplored. Focusing on mathematical reasoning, we present a comprehensive analysis of how misinformation affects intermediate reasoning steps and final answers. We also examine how effectively LLMs can correct misinformation when explicitly instructed to do so. Even with explicit instructions, LLMs succeed less than half the time in rectifying misinformation, despite possessing correct internal knowledge, leading to significant accuracy drops (10.02% – 72.20%). Further analysis shows that applying factual corrections early in the reasoning process most effectively reduces misinformation propagation, and fine-tuning on synthesized data with early-stage corrections significantly improves reasoning factuality. Our work offers a practical approach to mitigating misinformation propagation.

Unraveling Misinformation Propagation in LLM Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) excel in general tasks but struggle with domain-specific ones, requiring fine-tuning with specific data. With many open-source LLMs available, selecting the best model for fine-tuning downstream tasks is challenging, primarily focusing on how to quickly identify the optimal LLM. We introduce a Data and Model Compression Framework (DaMoC) that addresses this challenge by: 1) Data Level: A systematic categorization of data filtering methodologies for LLMs is first established, classifying them into three distinct paradigms: (1) distribution-aware methods, (2) quality-aware methods, and (3) hybrid approaches considering both dimensions. Further, we enhance the density of key tokens in the text achieving token compression. Subsequently, we use an LLM to iterative rewrite the text to optimize its expression. 2) Model Level: We use layer similarity scores to assess each layer's importance and remove those with lower importance. Then, we introduce a sparse merging paradigm to preserve as much of the original model's capability as possible. Extensive experiments on four datasets, medical Q&A, financial Q&A, general Q&A, and reading comprehension, show that we can select the optimal LLM while saving approximately 20-fold in training time.

DaMoC: Efficiently Selecting the Optimal Large Language Model for Fine-tuning Domain Tasks Based on Data and Model Compression

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have become increasingly powerful in multimodal learning by enabling modular specialization across modalities. However, their effectiveness remains unclear when additional modalities introduce more noise than complementary information. Existing approaches, such as the Partial Information Decomposition, struggle to scale beyond two modalities and lack the resolution needed for instance-level control. We propose **B**eyond **T**wo-modality **W**eighting (**BTW**), a bi-level, non-parametric weighting framework that combines instance-level Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and modality-level mutual information (MI) to dynamically adjust modality importance during training. Our method does not require additional parameters and can be applied to an arbitrary number of modalities. Specifically, BTW computes per‐example KL weights by measuring the divergence between each unimodal and the current multimodal prediction, and modality‐wide MI weights by estimating global alignment between unimodal and multimodal outputs. Extensive experiments on sentiment regression and clinical classification demonstrate that our method significantly improves regression performance and multiclass classification accuracy.

BTW: A Non-Parametric Variance Stabilization Framework for Multimodal Model Integration

Conversational derailment — when online discussions stray from their intended topics due to toxic or inappropriate remarks — is a common issue on online platforms. These derailments can have negative impacts on users and the online community. While previous work has focused on post hoc identification of toxic content, recent efforts emphasize proactive prediction of derailments before they occur, enabling early moderation. However, forecasting derailment is difficult due to the context-dependent emergence of toxicity and the need for timely alerts. We prompt pre-trained large language models (LLMs) to predict conversational derailment without task-specific fine-tuning. We compare a range of prompting strategies, including chain-of-thought reasoning (CoT) and few-shot exemplars, across small and large scale models, and evaluate their performance and inference-cost trade-offs on derailment benchmarks. Our experiments show that the best prompting configuration attains state-of-the-art performance, and forecasts derailments earlier than existing approaches. These results demonstrate that LLMs, even without fine-tuning, can serve as an effective tool for proactive conversational moderation.

Can LLMs Be Efficient Predictors of Conversational Derailment?

Longitudinal experiential data offers rich insights into dynamic human states, yet building models that generalize across diverse contexts remains challenging. This paper addresses how to best represent multi-modal longitudinal experiential data as text and formulate prediction tasks to maximize large language model (LLM) cross-distribution generalization. We propose ConText-LE, a framework grounded in linguistic and cognitive theories of contextual meaning-making, which systematically investigates text representation strategies and output formulations for robust behavioral forecasting. Our novel Meta-Narrative representation synthesizes complex temporal patterns into semantically rich narratives, while Prospective Narrative Generation reframes prediction as a generative task aligned with LLMs' inherent contextual understanding capabilities. Through comprehensive experiments on three diverse longitudinal datasets, we address the critical but underexplored challenge of cross-distribution generalization in mental health and educational behavior forecasting. We demonstrate that combining Meta-Narrative input with Prospective Narrative Generation significantly outperforms existing LLM-based approaches, achieving up to 12.28% improvement in out-of-distribution accuracy and up to 11.99% improvement in F1 scores over binary classification methods. Bidirectional evaluation and architectural ablation studies confirm the robustness of our approach, establishing ConText-LE as an effective framework for developing reliable behavioral forecasting systems across temporal and contextual shifts.

ConText-LE: Cross-Distribution Generalization for Longitudinal Experiential Data via Narrative-Based LLM Representations

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in personalizing the responses of large language models (LLMs). While existing evaluations primarily focus on whether a response aligns with a user’s preferences, we argue that factuality is an equally important yet often overlooked dimension. In the context of personalization, we define a model as robust if its responses are both factually accurate and align with the user preferences. To assess this, we introduce PERG, a scalable framework for evaluating robustness in LLMs, along with a new dataset, PERGData. We evaluate twelve state-of-the-art models across four prompting strategies. Our findings show that current LLMs struggle with robust personalization: even the strongest model (LLaMA3-70B) fails to maintain correctness in 5% of previously successful cases without personalization, while smaller models (e.g., 7B-scale) can fail more than 20% of the time. Further analysis reveals that robustness is significantly affected by the nature of the query and the type of user preference. To mitigate these failures, we propose Pref-Aligner, a two-stage approach that improves robustness by an average of 25% across models. Our work highlights critical gaps in current evaluation practices and introduces tools and metrics to support more reliable, user-aligned LLM deployments.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES