China

Large language models (LLMs) excel across many natural language processing tasks but face challenges in domain-specific, analytical tasks such as conducting research surveys. This study introduces ResearchArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs&#39; capabilities in conducting academic surveys—a foundational step in academic research. ResearchArena models the process in three stages: (1) information discovery, identifying relevant literature; (2) information selection, evaluating papers&#39; relevance and impact; and (3) information organization, structuring knowledge into hierarchical frameworks such as mind-maps. Notably, mind-map construction is treated as a bonus task, reflecting its supplementary role in survey-writing. To support these evaluations, we construct an offline environment of 12M full-text academic papers and 7.9K survey papers. To ensure ethical compliance, we do not redistribute copyrighted materials; instead, we provide code to construct the environment from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC). Preliminary evaluations reveal that LLM-based approaches underperform compared to simpler keyword-based retrieval methods, though recent reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 show slightly better zero-shot performance. These results underscore significant opportunities for advancing LLMs in autonomous research.

EMNLP 2025

ResearchArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents

Large language models (LLMs) excel across many natural language processing tasks but face challenges in domain-specific, analytical tasks such as conducting research surveys. This study introduces ResearchArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in conducting academic surveys—a foundational step in academic research. ResearchArena models the process in three stages: (1) information discovery, identifying relevant literature; (2) information selection, evaluating papers' relevance and impact; and (3) information organization, structuring knowledge into hierarchical frameworks such as mind-maps. Notably, mind-map construction is treated as a bonus task, reflecting its supplementary role in survey-writing. To support these evaluations, we construct an offline environment of 12M full-text academic papers and 7.9K survey papers. To ensure ethical compliance, we do not redistribute copyrighted materials; instead, we provide code to construct the environment from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC). Preliminary evaluations reveal that LLM-based approaches underperform compared to simpler keyword-based retrieval methods, though recent reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 show slightly better zero-shot performance. These results underscore significant opportunities for advancing LLMs in autonomous research.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Historically, scientific discovery has been a lengthy and costly process, demanding substantial time and resources from initial conception to final results. To accelerate scientific discovery, reduce research costs, and improve research quality, we introduce Agent Laboratory, an autonomous LLM-based framework capable of completing the entire research process. This framework accepts a human-provided research idea and progresses through three stages--literature review, experimentation, and report writing--in order to produce research, including a code repository and a research report, while enabling users to provide feedback and guidance at each stage. We deploy Agent Laboratory with various state-of-the-art LLMs and invite multiple researchers to assess its quality by participating in a survey, providing human feedback to guide the research process, and then evaluate the final paper. We found that: (1) Agent Laboratory driven by o1-preview generates the best research outcomes; (2) The generated machine learning code is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods; (3) Incorporating human involvement improves the overall quality of research; (4) Agent Laboratory reduces research expenses, achieving an 84% decrease compared to previous autonomous research methods. We hope Agent Laboratory enables researchers to allocate more effort toward creative ideation rather than low-level coding and writing, ultimately accelerating scientific discovery.

Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants

Anomaly detection (AD), also known as Outlier Detection, is a longstanding problem in machine learning, which has recently been applied to text data. In these datasets, a textual anomaly is a part of the text that does not fit the overall topic of the text. Some recent approaches to textual AD have used transformer models, achieving positive results but with trade-offs in pre-training time and inflexibility with respect to new domains. Others have used linear models which are fast and more flexible but not always competitive on certain datasets. We introduce a new approach based on Large Pre-trained Language Models in three modalities. Our findings indicate that LLMs beat baselines when AD is presented as an imbalanced classification problem regardless of the concentration of anomalous samples. However, their performance is markedly worse on unsupervised AD, suggesting that the concept of "anomaly" may somehow elude the LLM reasoning process.

Can LLMs Find a Needle in a Haystack? A Look at Anomaly Detection Language Modeling

Text-to-image models are appealing for customizing visual advertisements and targeting specific populations. We investigate this potential by examining the demographic bias within ads for different ad topics, and the disparate level of persuasiveness (judged by models) of ads that are identical except for gender/race of the people portrayed. We also experiment with a technique to target ads for specific countries.

The Face of Persuasion: Analyzing Bias and Generating Culture-Aware Ads

Slang is a commonly used type of informal language that poses a daunting challenge to NLP systems. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), however, have made the problem more approachable. While LLM agents are becoming more widely applied to intermediary tasks such as slang detection and slang interpretation, their generalizability and reliability are heavily dependent on whether these models have captured structural knowledge about slang that align well with human attested slang usages. To answer this question, we contribute a systematic comparison between human and machine-generated slang usages. Our evaluative framework focuses on three core aspects: 1) Characteristics of the usages that reflect systematic biases in how machines perceive slang, 2) Creativity reflected by both lexical coinages and word reuses employed by the slang usages, and 3) Informativeness of the slang usages when used as gold-standard examples for model distillation. By comparing human-attested slang usages from the Online Slang Dictionary (OSD) and slang generated by GPT-4o and Llama-3, we find significant biases in how LLMs perceive slang. Our results suggest that while LLMs have captured significant knowledge about the creative aspects of slang, such knowledge does not align with humans sufficiently to enable LLMs for extrapolative tasks such as linguistic analyses.

How do Language Models Generate Slang: A Systematic Comparison between Human and Machine-Generated Slang Usages

Training robust retriever and reranker models typically relies on large-scale retrieval datasets; for example, the BGE collection contains 1.6 million query-passage pairs sourced from various data sources. However, we find that certain datasets can negatively impact model effectivenesstextemdashpruning 8 out of 15 datasets from the BGE collection, which reduces the training set size by 2.35times , increases nDCG@10 on BEIR by 1.0 point. This motivates a deeper examination of training data quality, with a particular focus on "false negatives", where relevant passages are incorrectly labeled as irrelevant. We propose a simple, cost-effective approach using cascading LLM prompts to identify and relabel hard negatives. Experimental results show that relabeling false negatives with true positives improves both E5 (base) and Qwen2.5-7B embedding models by 0.7textemdash1.4 nDCG@10 on BEIR and by 1.7textemdash1.8 nDCG@10 on zero-shot AIR-Bench evaluation. Similar gains are observed for rerankers fine-tuned on the relabeled data, such as Qwen2.5-3B on BEIR. The reliability of the cascading design is further supported by human annotation results, where we find judgment by GPT-4o shows much higher agreement with humans than GPT-4o mini. All datasets and code will be released upon publication.

Hard Negatives, Hard Lessons: Revisiting Training Data Quality for Robust Information Retrieval with LLMs

Event argument extraction identifies arguments for predefined event roles in text. Traditional evaluations rely on exact match (EM), requiring predicted arguments to match annotated spans exactly. However, this approach fails for generative models like large language models (LLMs), which produce diverse yet semantically accurate responses. EM underestimates performance by disregarding valid variations, implicit arguments (unstated but inferable), and scattered arguments (distributed across a document). To bridge this gap, we introduce Reliable Evaluation framework for Generative event argument extraction (REGen), a framework that better aligns with human judgment. Across six datasets, REGen improves performance by an average of 23.93 F1 points over EM. Human validation further confirms REGen’s effectiveness, achieving 87.67% alignment with human assessments of argument correctness.

REGen: A Reliable Evaluation Framework for Generative Event Argument Extraction

The accurate trust assessment of large language models (LLMs), which can enable selective prediction and improve user confidence, is challenging due to the diverse multi-modal input paradigms. We propose textbfFunctionally textbfEquivalent textbfSampling for textbfTrust textbfAssessment (FESTA), an input sampling technique for multimodal models, which generates an uncertainty measure based on the equivalent and complementary input sampling. The sampling approach expands the input space to measure the consistency (through equivalent samples) and sensitivity (through complementary samples) properties of the model. These two uncertainty measures are combined to form the final FESTA estimate. Our approach only requires black-box access, and is unsupervised. The experiments are conducted with various off-the-shelf multi-modal LLMs, on visual and audio reasoning tasks. The proposed FESTA approach is shown to significantly improve (33.3% relative improvement for vision-LLMs and 29.6% relative improvement for audio-LLMs) the area-under-receiver-operating-curve (AUROC) metric on these reasoning tasks.

FESTA: Functionally Equivalent Sampling for Trust Assessment of Multimodal LLMs

There has been little systematic study on how dialectal differences affect toxicity detection by modern LLMs. Furthermore, although using LLMs as evaluators ("LLM-as-a-judge") is a growing research area, their sensitivity to dialectal nuances is still underexplored and requires more focused attention. In this paper, we address these gaps through a comprehensive toxicity evaluation of LLMs across diverse dialects. We create a multi-dialect dataset through synthetic transformations and human-assisted translations, covering 10 language clusters and 60 varieties. We then evaluate five LLMs on their ability to assess toxicity, measuring multilingual, dialectal, and LLM-human consistency. Our findings show that LLMs are sensitive to both dialectal shifts and low-resource multilingual variation, though the most persistent challenge remains aligning their predictions with human judgments.

Dialectal Toxicity Detection: Evaluating LLM-as-a-Judge Consistency Across Language Varieties

This paper introduces a novel method for testing the components of theories of (dialogue) coherence through utterance substitution. The method is described and then applied to Inference Anchoring Theory (IAT) in a large scale experimental study with 933 dialogue snippets and 87 annotators. IAT has been used for substantial corpus annotation and practical applications. To address the aim of finding out if and to what extent two aspects of IAT -- illocutionary acts and propositional relations -- contribute to dialogue coherence, we designed an experiment for systematically comparing the coherence ratings for several variants of short debate snippets. The comparison is between original human-human debate snippets, snippets generated with an IAT-compliant algorithm and snippets produced with ablated versions of the algorithm. This allows us to systematically compare snippets that have identical underlying structures as well as IAT-deficient structures with each other. We found that propositional relations do impact on dialogue coherence (at a statistically highly significant level) whereas we found no such effect for illocutionary act expression. This result suggests that fine-grained inferential relations impact on dialogue coherence, complementing the higher-level coherence structures of, for instance, Rhetorical Structure Theory.

Coherence of Argumentative Dialogue Snippets: A New Method for Large Scale Evaluation with an Application to Inference Anchoring Theory

Negation reasoning remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs), often causing incorrect interpretations of negated statements. In this study, we analyze various LLMs for their handling of negation and propose two genres of prompts Warning-based and Persona-based, which improve overall accuracy by up to 3.17% and distractor negation accuracy by up to 25.14% over most competitive baselines. Next, we assess the robustness of LLMs by reordering prompts while preserving meaning, observing instability linked to positional encoding schemes. Further, we introduce a negative token attention score (NTAS) to quantify attention to negation words. From the comprehensive analysis, we point out that within a specific LLM family, the performance of a model (measured using accuracy) correlates more with NTAS than with model size.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES