China

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a robust mastery of syntax when processing and generating text. While this suggests internalized understanding of hierarchical syntax and dependency relations, the precise mechanism by which they represent syntactic structure is an open area within interpretability research. Probing provides one way to identify the mechanism of syntax being linearly encoded in activations, however, no comprehensive study has yet established whether a model&#39;s probing accuracy reliably predicts its downstream syntactic performance. Adopting a &quot;mechanisms vs. outcomes&quot; framework, we evaluate 32 open-weight transformer models and find that syntactic features extracted via probing fail to predict outcomes of targeted syntax evaluations across English linguistic phenomena. Our results highlight a substantial disconnect between latent syntactic representations found via probing and observable syntactic behaviors in downstream tasks.

EMNLP 2025

Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic Evaluations

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a robust mastery of syntax when processing and generating text. While this suggests internalized understanding of hierarchical syntax and dependency relations, the precise mechanism by which they represent syntactic structure is an open area within interpretability research. Probing provides one way to identify the mechanism of syntax being linearly encoded in activations, however, no comprehensive study has yet established whether a model's probing accuracy reliably predicts its downstream syntactic performance. Adopting a "mechanisms vs. outcomes" framework, we evaluate 32 open-weight transformer models and find that syntactic features extracted via probing fail to predict outcomes of targeted syntax evaluations across English linguistic phenomena. Our results highlight a substantial disconnect between latent syntactic representations found via probing and observable syntactic behaviors in downstream tasks.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

As large language models (LLMs) become integral to code-related tasks, a central question emerges: do LLMs truly understand program execution semantics? We introduce EquiBench, a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs through equivalence checking, i.e., determining whether two programs produce identical outputs for all possible inputs. Unlike prior code generation benchmarks, this task directly tests a model’s understanding of code execution semantics. EquiBench consists of 2400 program pairs across four languages and six categories. These pairs are generated through program analysis, compiler scheduling, and superoptimization, ensuring high-confidence labels, nontrivial difficulty, and full automation. The transformations span syntactic edits, structural modifications, and algorithmic changes, covering a broad spectrum of semantic variation. We evaluate 19 state-of-the-art LLMs and find that in the most challenging categories, the best accuracies are 63.8% and 76.2%, only modestly above the 50% random baseline. Further analysis reveals that models often rely on syntactic similarity rather than exhibiting robust reasoning over execution semantics, highlighting fundamental limitations.

EquiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Reasoning about Program Semantics via Equivalence Checking

Large language models (LLMs) require continual knowledge updates to keep pace with the evolving world. While various model editing methods have been proposed, most face critical challenges in lifelong learning contexts due to two fundamental limitations: (1) Edit Overshooting - parameter updates intended for a specific fact spill over to unrelated regions, causing interference with previously retained knowledge; and (2) Knowledge Entanglement - polysemantic neurons' overlapping encoding of multiple concepts makes it difficult to isolate and edit a single fact. In this paper, we propose MicroEdit, a neuron-level editing method that performs minimal and controlled interventions within LLMs. By leveraging a sparse autoencoder (SAE), MicroEdit disentangles knowledge representations and activates only a minimal set of necessary neurons for precise parameter updates. This targeted design enables fine-grained control over the editing scope, effectively mitigating interference and preserving unrelated knowledge. Extensive experiments show that MicroEdit outperforms prior methods and robustly handles lifelong knowledge editing across QA and Hallucination settings on LLaMA and Mistral.

MicroEdit: Neuron-level Knowledge Disentanglement and Localization in Lifelong Model Editing

Understanding word meanings in context is a fundamental capability for Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite extensive evaluation efforts, the extent to which LLMs show evidence that they truly grasp word meanings remains underexplored. In this paper, we address this gap by evaluating the Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs, comparing their performance to state-of-the-art systems specifically designed for the task. Notably, we find that leading models such as GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 reach performance on par with specialized WSD systems, while also demonstrating greater robustness across domains and levels of ambiguity. We further assess the top-performing model, i.e. GPT-4o, across three generative settings: definition generation, free explanation and example generation. Our results reveal that GPT-4o consistently achieves over 90% accuracy, with the highest performance observed when the model is allowed to freely to explain the meaning of target words in context. We release our code and data at: anonimizedurl.

Do Large Language Models Understand Word Senses?

Question Answering (QA) on narrative text poses a unique challenge for current systems, requiring a deep understanding of long, complex documents. However, the reliability of NarrativeQA, the most widely used benchmark in this domain, is hindered by noisy documents and flawed QA pairs. In this work, we introduce LiteraryQA, a high-quality subset of NarrativeQA focused on literary works. Using a human- and LLM-validated pipeline, we identify and correct low-quality QA samples while removing extraneous text from source documents. We then carry out a meta-evaluation of automatic metrics to reveal that all \textit{n}-gram-based metrics have a low system-level correlation to human judgment, while LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations, even with small open-weights models, can strongly agree with the ranking identified by humans. Finally, we benchmark a set of long-context LLMs on LiteraryQA. We release our code and data at https://omitted.link.

LiteraryQA: Towards Effective Evaluation of Long-document Narrative QA

Relation extraction (RE) is a core task in natural language processing, crucial for semantic understanding, knowledge graph construction, and enhancing downstream applications. However, Arabic RE remains a challenging task due to the language’s rich morphology, orthographic ambiguity, syntactic complexity, and wide dialectal variation. To advance research in this area, we present the largest and most diverse Arabic RE corpus to date: over 33K sentences (approx550K tokens) annotated with approx15K relation triples using 40 relation types. All annotations were manually curated by expert annotators, achieving a 85.2\% Cohen's κ inter-annotator agreement, ensuring high reliability. We benchmark the dataset using both supervised models and in-context learning with LLMs. Supervised models obtain an F1 score of 92.89\% for relation extraction, while LLMs achieve 72.73\% F1 in joint entity and relation extraction. These results establish strong baselines and expose key challenges, paving the way for future work in Arabic RE.

mathrmWojoodRelatioⁿs: Arabic Relation Extraction Corpus and Modeling

Vision-language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP and SigLIP, have become the de facto standard for multimodal tasks, serving as essential building blocks for recent Multimodal Large Language Models, including LLaVA and PaliGemma. However, current evaluations for VLMs remain heavily anchored to ImageNet. In this paper, we question whether ImageNet’s coverage is still sufficiently challenging for modern VLMs, and investigate the impact of adding novel and varied concept categories, i.e., semantically grouped fine-grained synsets. To this end, we introduce Concept-pedia, a novel, large-scale, semantically-annotated multimodal resource covering more than 165,000 concepts. Leveraging a language-agnostic, automatic annotation pipeline grounded in Wikipedia, Concept-pedia expands the range of visual concepts, including diverse abstract categories. Building on Concept-pedia, we also present a manually-curated Visual Concept Recognition evaluation benchmark, Concept-10k, that spans thousands of concepts across a wide range of categories. Our experiments show that current models, although excelling on ImageNet, struggle with Concept-10k. Not only do these findings highlight a persistent bias toward ImageNet-centric concepts, but they also underscore the urgent need for more representative benchmarks. By offering a broader and semantically richer testbed, Concept-10k aims to support the development of multimodal systems that better generalize to the complexities of real-world visual concepts.

Concept-pedia: a Wide-coverage Semantically-annotated Multimodal Dataset

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their tendency to hallucinate poses serious challenges for reliable deployment. Despite numerous hallucination detection methods, their evaluations often rely on ROUGE, a metric based on lexical overlap that misaligns with human judgments. Through comprehensive human studies, we demonstrate that while ROUGE exhibits high recall, its extremely low precision leads to misleading performance estimates. In fact, several established detection methods show performance drops of up to 45.9% when assessed using human-aligned metrics like LLM-as-Judge. Moreover, our analysis reveals that simple heuristics based on response length can rival complex detection techniques, exposing a fundamental flaw in current evaluation practices. We argue that adopting semantically aware and robust evaluation frameworks is essential to accurately gauge the true performance of hallucination detection methods, ultimately ensuring the trustworthiness of LLM outputs.

The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMs

With new large language models (LLMs) emerging frequently, it is important to consider the potential value of model-agnostic approaches that can provide interpretability across a variety of architectures. While recent advances in LLM interpretability show promise, many rely on complex, model-specific methods with high computational costs. To address these limitations, we propose NormXLogit, a novel technique for assessing the significance of individual input tokens. This method operates based on the input and output representations associated with each token. First, we demonstrate that during the pre-training of LLMs, the norms of word embeddings effectively capture token importance. Second, we reveal a significant relationship between a token's importance and the extent to which its representation can resemble the model's final prediction. Extensive analyses reveal that our approach outperforms existing gradient-based methods in terms of faithfulness and offers competitive performance in layer-wise explanations compared to leading architecture-specific techniques.

NormXLogit: The Head-on-Top Never Lies

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to scale, understanding how effectively their internal capacity is utilized becomes increasingly important, especially for inference-time efficiency. While existing scaling laws relate model size to loss and compute, they offer little insight into the representational dynamics of individual components. In this work, we focus on the Feed-Forward Network (FFN), a dominant sub-block in decoder-only transformers, and recast FFN width selection as a \emph{spectral utilization} problem. We introduce a lightweight, differentiable diagnostic suite comprising: \textbf{Hard Rank} (Participation Ratio), Soft Rank (spectral entropy), Spectral Concentration, and the composite Spectral Utilization Index (SUI), designed to quantify how many latent directions are meaningfully activated. Our spectral audit across GPT-2, LLaMA, and nGPT models reveals that spectral utilization grows with model size but not monotonically with width, often peaking at intermediate dimensions (e.g., D=2048). We identify clear instances of \emph{spectral collapse}, where wider FFNs concentrate variance into a narrow subspace, leaving much of the latent space unused.

Spectral Scaling Laws in Language Models: \ emph{How Effectively Do Feed-Forward Networks Use Their Latent Space?}

Although reasoning has become a central focus for large language models, there remains a significant gap in corpora and human evaluation methods for lower-resource languages. To address this, we introduce the Trojsten Benchmark -- a dataset of 1,108 high-school competition problems in mathematics, physics, and programming sourced from Slovak archives -- that challenges conventional grading due to its complex formatting and language. We further introduce a LLM-based rubric-based grading approach to generate detailed evaluation rubrics and grade open-ended solutions, with our experiments revealing an average absolute grading difference of just 1.05 points compared to human evaluators. Extensive experiments benchmark various prompting techniques and models -- including GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and open-weight models like Llama 3 -- highlighting both promising performance and persistent challenges in multistep reasoning assessment.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

EquiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Reasoning about Program Semantics via Equivalence Checking

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES