China

Cognitive Restructuring (CR) uses multi-turn dialogue to identify and restructure one&#39;s negative thoughts, arising from mental health issues, into more helpful and positive ones. Clinician shortage and stigma urge the development of human-LLM interactive psychotherapy for CR. Yet, effectively implementing CR is hindered by entrenched cognitive distortions, emotional resistance, and individual differences, which existing works have not overcome. To bridge this gap, we propose CRDial, a novel framework that structures CR as theory-grounded multi-stage multi-turn dialogue, integrating multi-aspect supportive strategies for emotional management and a multi-channel loop mechanism to account for diverse individual distortions. With CRDial, we distill Crisp, a large-scale and high-quality bilingual dialogue dataset, from LLM. We then train Crispers, Crisp-based conversational LLMs for CR, at 7B and 14B scales. Extensive human studies show the superiority of Crispers in pointwise, pairwise, and intervention evaluations.

EMNLP 2025

Crisp: Cognitive Restructuring of Negative Thoughts through Multi-turn Supportive Dialogues

Cognitive Restructuring (CR) uses multi-turn dialogue to identify and restructure one's negative thoughts, arising from mental health issues, into more helpful and positive ones. Clinician shortage and stigma urge the development of human-LLM interactive psychotherapy for CR. Yet, effectively implementing CR is hindered by entrenched cognitive distortions, emotional resistance, and individual differences, which existing works have not overcome. To bridge this gap, we propose CRDial, a novel framework that structures CR as theory-grounded multi-stage multi-turn dialogue, integrating multi-aspect supportive strategies for emotional management and a multi-channel loop mechanism to account for diverse individual distortions. With CRDial, we distill Crisp, a large-scale and high-quality bilingual dialogue dataset, from LLM. We then train Crispers, Crisp-based conversational LLMs for CR, at 7B and 14B scales. Extensive human studies show the superiority of Crispers in pointwise, pairwise, and intervention evaluations.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Neural text-based models for detecting machine-translated texts can rely on named entities (NEs) as classification shortcuts. While masking NEs encourages learning genuine translationese signals, it degrades the classification performance. Incorporating speech features compensates for this loss, but their interaction with NE reliance requires careful investigation. Through systematic attribution analysis across modalities, we find that bimodal integration leads to more balanced feature utilization, reducing the reliance on NEs in text while moderating overemphasis attribution patterns in speech features. All the code and data will be publicly released.

From Shortcuts to Balance: Attribution Analysis of Speech-Text Feature Utilization in Distinguishing Original from Machine-Translated Texts

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in general translation tasks. However, the increasing demand for high-quality translations that are not only adequate but also fluent and elegant. To assess the extent to which current LLMs can meet these demands, we introduce a suitable benchmark (PoetMT) for translating classical Chinese poetry into English. This task requires not only adequacy in translating culturally and historically significant content but also a strict adherence to linguistic fluency and poetic elegance. Our study reveals that existing LLMs fall short of this task. To address these issues, we propose RAT, a Retrieval-Augmented machine Translation method that enhances the translation process by incorporating knowledge related to classical poetry. Additionally, we propose an automatic evaluation metric based on GPT-4, which better assesses translation quality in terms of adequacy, fluency, and elegance, overcoming the limitations of traditional metrics. Our dataset and code will be made available. Our dataset and code will be available upon acceptance.

Benchmarking LLMs for Translating Classical Chinese Poetry: Evaluating Adequacy, Fluency, and Elegance

Large language model (LLM) role-playing has gained widespread attention. Authentic character knowledge is crucial for constructing realistic LLM role-playing agents. However, existing works usually overlook the exploration of LLMs' ability to detect characters' known knowledge errors (KKE) and unknown knowledge errors (UKE) while playing roles, which would lead to low-quality automatic construction of character trainable corpus. In this paper, we propose RoleKE-Bench to evaluate LLMs' ability to detect errors in KKE and UKE. The results indicate that even the latest LLMs struggle to detect these two types of errors effectively, especially when it comes to familiar knowledge. We experimented with various reasoning strategies and propose an agent-based reasoning method, Self-Recollection and Self-Doubt (S²RD), to explore further the potential for improving error detection capabilities.

Revealing and Mitigating the Challenge of Detecting Character Knowledge Errors in LLM Role-Playing

Minimum Bayes risk (MBR) decoding is a decision rule of text generation, which selects the hypothesis that maximizes the expected utility, and robustly generates higher-quality texts than maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding. However, it depends on sample texts drawn from the text generation model; thus, it is hard to choose the hypothesis that reflects the knowledge or information of out-of-domain. To tackle this issue, we propose case-based decision-theoretic (CBDT) decoding, another approach to the expected utility estimation using examples of domain data. CBDT decoding not only generates higher-quality texts than MAP decoding, but also the combination of MBR and CBDT decoding outperformed MBR decoding in seven domain GermanrightarrowEnglish and JapaneseleftrightarrowEnglish translation tasks and image captioning tasks on MSCOCO and nocaps datasets.

Case-Based Decision-Theoretic Decoding with Quality Memories

There is increasing evidence of Human Label Variation (HLV) in Natural Language Inference (NLI), where annotators assign different labels to the same premise-hypothesis pair. However, *within-label variation* — cases where annotators agree on the same label but provide divergent reasoning — poses an additional and mostly overlooked challenge. Several NLI datasets contain highlighted words in the NLI item as explanations, but the same spans on the NLI item can be highlighted for different reasons, as evidenced by free-text explanations, which offer a window into annotators’ reasoning. To systematically understand this problem and gain insight into the rationales behind NLI labels, we introduce LiTEx, a linguistically-informed taxonomy for categorizing free-text explanations. Using this taxonomy, we annotate a subset of the e-SNLI dataset, validate the taxonomy’s reliability, and analyze how it aligns with NLI labels, highlights, and explanations. We further assess the taxonomy’s usefulness in explanation generation, demonstrating that conditioning generation on LiTEx yields explanations that are linguistically closer to human explanations than those generated using only labels or highlights. Our approach thus not only captures within-label variation but also shows how taxonomy-guided generation for reasoning can bridge the gap between human and model explanations more effectively than existing strategies.

LiTEx: A Linguistic Taxonomy of Explanations for Understanding Within-Label Variation in Natural Language Inference

As large language models (LLMs) continue to improve, their evaluation increasingly centers on complex, high-level tasks, often at the expense of systematically assessing fundamental capabilities. To address this gap, recent work proposed LMentry, a compact benchmark comprising tasks that are trivial for humans but remain surprisingly difficult for LLMs. However, LMentry is limited to English, leaving its insights linguistically narrow. In this paper, we present Multi-LMentry, a ground-up recreation of LMentry that enables systematic evaluation of LLMs on basic reasoning and understanding tasks across nine diverse languages. Multi-LMentry includes English and expands to Catalan, German, Spanish, Basque, Galician, Korean, Italian, and Brazilian Portuguese, emphasizing the importance of cross-lingual and low-resource settings. To validate that Multi-LMentry is still trivial for humans, we demonstrate that L2 speakers with only elementary proficiency achieve near-perfect scores in a low-resource language, namely, Basque. Through extensive experiments, we reveal that state-of-the-art open-weight multilingual LLMs still fall short of human performance on elementary tasks in many languages. Our results expose new failure modes that remain hidden in monolingual evaluation, underscoring the need for rigorous, language-diverse ``unit tests'' of core model abilities.

Multi-LMentry: Can Multilingual LLMs Solve Elementary Tasks Across Languages?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an effective approach to enhance the factual accuracy of large language models (LLMs) by retrieving information from external databases, which are typically composed of diverse sources, to supplement the limited internal knowledge of LLMs. However, the standard RAG often risks retrieving incorrect information, as it relies solely on relevance between a query and a document, overlooking the heterogeneous reliability of these sources. To address this issue, we propose Reliability-Aware RAG (RA-RAG), a multi-source RAG framework that estimates the reliability of sources and leverages this information to prioritize highly reliable and relevant documents, ensuring more robust and accurate response generation. Specifically, RA-RAG first estimates source reliability by cross-checking information across multiple sources. It then retrieves documents from the top- reliable and relevant sources and aggregates their information using weighted majority voting (WMV), where the selective retrieval ensures scalability while not compromising the performance. Comprehensive experiments show that RA-RAG consistently outperforms baselines in scenarios with heterogeneous source reliability while scaling efficiently as the number of sources increases. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of RA-RAG to estimate real-world sources' reliability, highlighting its practical applicability.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Estimation of Source Reliability

Language models often fail on idiomatic, figurative, or context-sensitive inputs - not due to generation errors, but due to misinterpretation during input processing. We propose an input-only, model-agnostic method for anticipating such failures using token-level likelihood features inspired by surprisal and the Uniform Information Density hypothesis. These features capture localised uncertainty in input comprehension and outperform standard baselines across five linguistically challenging datasets. We show that span-localised features improve error detection for larger models, while smaller models benefit from global patterns. Our method requires no access to outputs or activations, offering a lightweight and generalisable approach to pre-generation error prediction.

From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errors

Although speech models are expected to align well with brain language processing when subjects are involved in listening, recent studies find that they cannot capture brain-relevant semantics beyond low-level features. Surprisingly, text models are better aligned since they can capture brain-relevant semantics. No previous study has investigated the alignment effectiveness of text/speech representations from multimodal models. Can speech embeddings from such multimodal models capture brain-relevant semantics through cross-modal interactions? Which modality can leverage this synergistic multimodal understanding for improved alignment with brain language processing? Can text/speech representations from such multimodal models outperform unimodal models? To address these questions, we systematically analyze multiple multimodal models, extracting both text- and speech-based representations to assess their alignment with MEG brain recordings during naturalistic story listening. We find that text embeddings from both multimodal and unimodal models significantly outperform speech embeddings from these models. Specifically, multimodal text embeddings exhibit a peak around 200 ms, suggesting that they benefit from speech embeddings, with heightened activity during this time period. However, speech embeddings from these multimodal models still show similar alignment compared to their unimodal counterparts, suggesting that they do not gain meaningful semantic benefits over text-based representations. These results highlight an asymmetry in cross-modal knowledge transfer where text modality benefits more from speech information but not vice versa.

Aligning Text/Speech Representations from Multimodal Models with MEG Brain Activity During Listening

Large language models, despite extensive alignment with human values and ethical principles, remain vulnerable to sophisticated jailbreak attacks that exploit their reasoning abilities. Existing safety measures often detect overt malicious intent but fail to address subtle, reasoning-driven vulnerabilities. In this work, we introduce POATE (Polar Opposite query generation, Adversarial Template construction, and Elaboration), a novel jailbreak technique that harnesses contrastive reasoning to provoke unethical responses. POATE crafts semantically opposing intents and integrates them with adversarial templates, steering models toward harmful outputs with remarkable subtlety. We conduct extensive evaluation across six diverse language model families of varying parameter sizes to demonstrate the robustness of the attack, achieving significantly higher attack success rates (44%) compared to existing methods. To counter this, we propose Intent-Aware CoT and Reverse Thinking CoT, which decompose queries to detect malicious intent and reason in reverse to evaluate and reject harmful responses. These methods enhance reasoning robustness and strengthen the model’s defense against adversarial exploits.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

From Shortcuts to Balance: Attribution Analysis of Speech-Text Feature Utilization in Distinguishing Original from Machine-Translated Texts

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES