China

Hierarchical text classification aims to classify documents into multiple labels within a hierarchical taxonomy, making it an essential yet challenging task in natural language processing. Recently, using Large Language Models (LLM) to tackle hierarchical text classification in a zero-shot manner has attracted increasing attention due to their cost-efficiency and flexibility. Given the challenges of understanding the hierarchy, various HTC prompting strategies have been explored to elicit the best performance from LLMs. However, our empirical study reveals that LLMs are highly sensitive to these prompting strategies---(i) within a task, different strategies yield substantially different results, and (ii) across various tasks, the relative effectiveness of a given strategy varies significantly. To address this, we propose a novel ensemble method, HiEPS, which integrates the results of diverse prompting strategies to promote LLMs&#39; reliability. We also introduce a path-valid voting mechanism for ensembling, which selects a valid result with the highest path frequency score. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets show that HiEPS boosts the performance of single prompting strategies and achieves SOTA results

EMNLP 2025

Ensembling Prompting Strategies for Zero-Shot Hierarchical Text Classification with Large Language Models

Hierarchical text classification aims to classify documents into multiple labels within a hierarchical taxonomy, making it an essential yet challenging task in natural language processing. Recently, using Large Language Models (LLM) to tackle hierarchical text classification in a zero-shot manner has attracted increasing attention due to their cost-efficiency and flexibility. Given the challenges of understanding the hierarchy, various HTC prompting strategies have been explored to elicit the best performance from LLMs. However, our empirical study reveals that LLMs are highly sensitive to these prompting strategies---(i) within a task, different strategies yield substantially different results, and (ii) across various tasks, the relative effectiveness of a given strategy varies significantly. To address this, we propose a novel ensemble method, HiEPS, which integrates the results of diverse prompting strategies to promote LLMs' reliability. We also introduce a path-valid voting mechanism for ensembling, which selects a valid result with the highest path frequency score. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets show that HiEPS boosts the performance of single prompting strategies and achieves SOTA results

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Instruction-following made modern large language models (LLMs) helpful assistants. However, the key to taming LLMs on complex instructions remains mysterious, for that there are huge gaps between models trained by open-source community and those trained by leading companies. To bridge the gap, we propose a simple and scalable approach UltraIF for building LLMs that can follow complex instructions with open-source data. UltraIF first decomposes real-world user prompts into simpler queries, constraints, and corresponding evaluation questions for the constraints. Then, we train an UltraComposer to compose constraint-associated prompts with evaluation questions. This prompt composer allows us to synthesize complicated instructions as well as filter responses with evaluation questions. In our experiment, for the first time, we successfully align LLaMA-3.1-8B-Base to catch up with its instruct version on 5 instruction-following benchmarks without any benchmark information, using only 8B model as response generator and evaluator. The aligned model also achieved competitive scores on other benchmarks. Moreover, we also show that UltraIF could further improve LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct through self-alignment, motivating broader use cases for the method.

UltraIF: Advancing Instruction Following from the Wild

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing dense retrieval through query augmentation. However, most existing methods treat the LLM and the retriever as separate modules, overlooking the alignment between generation and ranking objectives. In this work, we propose ExpandR, a unified LLM-augmented dense retrieval framework that jointly optimizes both the LLM and the retriever. ExpandR employs the LLM to generate semantically rich query expansions, which are leveraged to enhance the retriever's training. Simultaneously, the LLM is trained using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), guided by a carefully designed reward function that balances retrieval effectiveness and generation consistency. This joint optimization paradigm enables mutual adaptation between the LLM and the retriever, resulting in query expansions that are both informative and well-suited for retrieval. Experimental results on multiple benchmarks show that ExpandR consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving more than a 5% improvement in retrieval performance. All code will be publicly released on GitHub.

ExpandR: Teaching Dense Retrievers Beyond Queries with LLM Guidance

Large language models (LLMs) often exhibit limited performance on domain-specific tasks due to the natural disproportionate representation of specialized information in their training data and the static nature of these datasets. Knowledge scarcity and temporal lag create knowledge gaps for domain applications. While post-training on domain datasets can embed knowledge into models, existing approaches have some limitations. Continual Pre-Training (CPT) treats all tokens in domain documents with equal importance, failing to prioritize critical knowledge points, while supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with question-answer pairs struggles to develop the coherent knowledge structures necessary for complex reasoning tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Reinforcement Learning from Augmented Generation (RLAG). Our approach iteratively cycles between sampling generations and optimizing the model through calculated rewards, effectively embedding critical and contextually coherent domain knowledge. We select generated outputs with the highest log probabilities as the sampling result, then compute three tailored reward metrics to guide the optimization process. To comprehensively evaluate domain expertise, we assess answer accuracy and the rationality of explanations generated for correctly answered questions. Experimental results across medical, legal, astronomy, and current events datasets demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms baseline approaches. Our code and data will be made publicly available upon publication.

Embedding Domain Knowledge for Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Augmented Generation

Seminal work by Huebner et al. (2021) showed that language models (LMs) trained on English Child-Directed Language (CDL) can outperform LMs trained on an equal amount of adult-directed text like Wikipedia. However, it remains unclear whether these results generalize across languages, architectures, and evaluation settings. We test this by comparing models trained on CDL vs. Wikipedia across two LM objectives (masked and causal), three languages (English, French, German), and three syntactic minimal pair benchmarks. Our results on these benchmarks show inconsistent benefits of CDL, which in most cases is outperformed by Wikipedia models. We then identify various shortcomings in these benchmarks, and introduce a novel testing methodology, FIT-CLAMS, which uses a frequency-controlled design to enable balanced comparisons across training corpora. Through minimal pair evaluations and regression analysis we show that training on CDL does not yield stronger generalizations for acquiring syntax and highlight the importance of controlling for frequency effects when evaluating syntactic ability.

Child-Directed Language Does Not Consistently Boost Syntax Learning in Language Models

Recent high profile incidents have demonstrated the susceptibility of Large Language Models (LLMs) to jailbreak attacks, or adversarial attacks used to illicit high risk behavior from a model, highlighting the critical need to safeguard widely-deployed models. Safeguarding approaches, which include fine-tuning models or having LLMs "self-reflect", may lengthen the inference time of a model, incur a computational penalty, reduce the semantic fluency of an output, and restrict "normal" model behavior. Importantly, these Safety-Performance Trade-offs (SPTs) remain an understudied area. In this work, we introduce a novel safeguard, called SAFENUDGE, that combines Controlled Text Generation with "nudging," or using text interventions to modify a model's behavior. SAFENUDGE triggers during text-generation while a jailbreak attack is being executed, and can reduce successful jailbreak attempts by 30% by guiding the LLM towards a safe response. It adds minimal latency to inference and has a negligible impact on the semantic fluency of outputs. Further, it supports tunable SPTs, meaning practitioners can set their own tolerance for trade-offs balancing safety and restrictions to normal model behaivor. SAFENUDGE is open-source and available through https://pypi.org/, and is compatible with models loaded with the Hugging Face transformers library.

SAFENUDGE: Safeguarding Large Language Models in Real-time with Tunable Safety-Performance Trade-offs

Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) are able to leverage in-context learning (ICL) to achieve high performance by leveraging cross-lingual knowledge transfer without parameter updates. However, their effectiveness is highly sensitive to example selection, particularly in multilingual settings. Based on the findings of existing work, three key factors influence multilingual ICL: (1) semantic similarity, (2) linguistic alignment, and (3) language-specific performance. However, existing approaches address these factors independently, without explicitly disentangling their combined impact, leaving optimal example selection underexplored. To address this gap, we propose balanced multi-factor ICL (BMF-ICL), a method that quantifies and optimally balances these factors for improved example selection. Experiments on mCSQA and TYDI across four MLLMs demonstrate that BMF-ICL outperforms existing methods. Further analysis highlights the importance of incorporating all three factors and the importance of selecting examples from multiple languages.

Balanced Multi-Factor In-Context Learning for Multilingual Large Language Models

Multilingual machine translation (MT) benchmarks play a central role in evaluating the capabilities of modern MT systems. Among them, the FLORES+ benchmark is widely used, offering English-to-many translation data for over 200 languages, curated with strict quality control protocols. However, we study data in four languages (Asante Twi, Japanese, Jinghpaw, and South Azerbaijani) and uncover critical shortcomings in the benchmark’s suitability for truly multilingual evaluation. Human assessments reveal that many translations fall below the claimed 90% quality standard, and the annotators report that source sentences are often too domain-specific and culturally biased toward the English-speaking world. We further demonstrate that simple heuristics, such as copying named entities, can yield non-trivial BLEU scores, suggesting vulnerabilities in the evaluation protocol. Notably, we show that MT models trained on naturalistic data perform poorly on FLORES+ while achieving significant gains on our domain-relevant evaluation set. Based on these findings, we advocate for multilingual MT benchmarks that use domain-general, named-entity-agnostic, and culturally neutral source texts to better reflect real-world translation challenges.

Languages Still Left Behind: Toward a Better Multilingual Machine Translation Benchmark

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities for many tasks, often by explicitly decomposing the task via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. Recent work on LLM-based translation designs hand-crafted prompts to decompose translation, or trains models to incorporate intermediate steps. Translating Step-by-step (Briakou et al., 2024), for instance, introduces a multi-step prompt with decomposition and refinement of translation with LLMs, which achieved state-of-the-art results on WMT24. In this work, we scrutinise this strategy’s effectiveness. Empirically, we find no clear evidence that performance gains stem from explicitly decomposing the translation process, at least for the models on test; and we show that simply prompting LLMs to “translate again” yields even better results than human-like step-by-step prompting. Our analysis does not rule out the role of reasoning, but instead invites future work exploring the factors for CoT’s effectiveness in the context of translation.

Please Translate Again: Two Simple Experiments on Whether Human-Like Reasoning Helps Translation

Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate state-of-the-art capabilities across diverse cross-lingual and multilingual tasks. Their complex internal mechanisms, however, often lack transparency, posing significant challenges in elucidating their internal processing of multilingualism, cross-lingual transfer dynamics and handling of language-specific features. This paper addresses this critical gap by presenting a survey of current explainability and interpretability methods specifically for MLLMs. To our knowledge, it is the first comprehensive review of its kind. Existing literature is categorised according to the explainability techniques employed, the multilingual tasks addressed, the languages investigated and available resources. The survey further identifies key challenges, distils core findings and outlines promising avenues for future research within this rapidly evolving domain.

Explainability and Interpretability of Multilingual Large Language Models: A Survey

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based question answering (QA) has emerged as a powerful method for processing long industrial documents. However, conventional text chunking approaches often neglect complex and long industrial document structures, causing information loss and reduced answer quality. To address this, we introduce \textbf{MultiDocFusion}, a multimodal chunking pipeline that integrates: (i) detection of document regions using vision-based document parsing, (ii) text extraction from these regions via OCR, (iii) reconstruction of document structure into a hierarchical tree using large language model (LLM)-based document section hierarchical parsing (DSHP-LLM), and (iv) construction of hierarchical chunks through DFS-based grouping. Extensive experiments across industrial benchmarks demonstrate that \textbf{MultiDocFusion} improves retrieval precision by 8–15% and ANLS QA scores by 2–3% compared to baselines, emphasizing the critical role of explicitly leveraging document hierarchy for multimodal document-based QA. These significant performance gains underscore the necessity of structure-aware chunking in enhancing the fidelity of RAG-based QA systems.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

UltraIF: Advancing Instruction Following from the Wild

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES