China

Benchmark data contamination (BDC) silently inflate the evaluation performance of large language models (LLMs), yet current work on BDC has centered on direct token overlap (data/label level), leaving the subtler and equally harmful semantic level BDC largely unexplored. This gap is critical in fake news detection task, where prior exposure to semantic BDC lets a model “remember” the answer instead of reasoning. We (1) are the first to formally defined semantic contamination for this task and (2) introduced the Semantic Sensitivity Amplifier (SSA)—a lightweight, model-agnostic framework that detect BDC risks across semantic to label level via an entity shift perturbation and a comprehensive interpretable metric, the SSA Factor. Evaluating 45 variants of nine LLMs (0.5B–72B parameters) across four BDC levels, we find LIAR2 accuracy climbs monotonically with injected contamination, while the SSA Factor escalates in near-perfect lock-step (rgeq.97, for models geq3B, p&lt;.05; ρ geq.9 overall, p&lt;.05). These results show that SSA provides a sensitive, scalable audit of comprehensive BDC risk and paves the way for more integrity evaluation of LLM-driven fake news detection task.

EMNLP 2025

SSA: Semantic Contamination of LLM-Driven Fake News Detection

Benchmark data contamination (BDC) silently inflate the evaluation performance of large language models (LLMs), yet current work on BDC has centered on direct token overlap (data/label level), leaving the subtler and equally harmful semantic level BDC largely unexplored. This gap is critical in fake news detection task, where prior exposure to semantic BDC lets a model “remember” the answer instead of reasoning. We (1) are the first to formally defined semantic contamination for this task and (2) introduced the Semantic Sensitivity Amplifier (SSA)—a lightweight, model-agnostic framework that detect BDC risks across semantic to label level via an entity shift perturbation and a comprehensive interpretable metric, the SSA Factor. Evaluating 45 variants of nine LLMs (0.5B–72B parameters) across four BDC levels, we find LIAR2 accuracy climbs monotonically with injected contamination, while the SSA Factor escalates in near-perfect lock-step (rgeq.97, for models geq3B, p<.05; ρ geq.9 overall, p<.05). These results show that SSA provides a sensitive, scalable audit of comprehensive BDC risk and paves the way for more integrity evaluation of LLM-driven fake news detection task.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

With the increasing use of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), strong retrieval models have become more important than ever. In healthcare, multimodal retrieval models that combine information from both text and images offer major advantages for many downstream tasks such as question answering, cross-modal retrieval, and multimodal summarization, since medical data often includes both formats. However, there is currently no standard benchmark to evaluate how well these models perform in medical settings. To address this gap, we introduce M3Retrieve, a Multimodal Medical Retrieval Benchmark. M3Retrieve spans 5 domains,16 medical fields, and 4 distinct tasks, with over 1.2 Million text documents and 164K multimodal queries, all collected under approved licenses. We evaluate leading multimodal retrieval models on this benchmark to explore the challenges specific to different medical specialities and to understand their impact on retrieval performance. By releasing M3Retrieve, we aim to enable systematic evaluation, foster model innovation, and accelerate research toward building more capable and reliable multimodal retrieval systems for medical applications.

M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine

We introduce CoDe-KG, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for extracting sentence-level knowledge graphs by combining robust coreference resolution with syntactic sentence decomposition. Using our model, we contribute a dataset of over 150 000 knowledge triples, which is open source. We also contribute a training corpus of 7248 rows for sentence complexity, 200 rows of gold human annotations for coreference resolution using lung-cancer abstracts from PubMed, 900 rows of gold human annotations for sentence conversion policies from sentences in the abstract, and 398 triples of gold human annotations. We systematically select optimal prompt-model pairs across five complexity categories, showing that hybrid chain-of-thought and few-shot prompting yields up to 99.8% exact-match accuracy on sentence simplification. On relation extraction (RE), our pipeline achieves 65.8% macro-F1 on REBEL, an 8-point gain over the prior state of the art, and 75.7% micro-F1 on WebNLG2, while matching or exceeding performance on Wiki-NRE and CaRB. Ablation studies demonstrate that integrating coreference and decomposition increases recall on rare relations by over 20%

Automated Knowledge Graph Construction using Large Language Models and Sentence Complexity Modelling

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the linguistic diversity of LLM safety research, highlighting the English-centric nature of the field. Through a systematic review of nearly 300 publications from 2020--2024 across major NLP conferences and workshops at ACL, we identify a significant and growing language gap in LLM safety research, with even high-resource non-English languages receiving minimal attention. We further observe that non-English languages are rarely studied as a standalone language and that English safety research exhibits poor language documentation practice. To motivate future research into multilingual safety, we make several recommendations based on our survey, and we then pose three concrete future directions on safety evaluation, training data generation, and crosslingual safety generalization. Based on our survey and proposed directions, the field can develop more robust, inclusive AI safety practices for diverse global populations.

The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring The Language Gap To Mitigating It

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been explored for automating or enhancing penetration testing tasks, but their effectiveness and reliability across diverse attack phases remain open questions. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLM-based agents—from singular to modular—across realistic penetration testing scenarios, analyzing their empirical performance and recurring failure patterns. We further investigate the impact of core functional capabilities on agent success, operationalized through five targeted augmentations: Global Context Memory (GCM), Inter-Agent Messaging (IAM), Context-Conditioned Invocation (CCI), Adaptive Planning (AP), and Real-Time Monitoring (RTM). These interventions respectively support the capabilities of Context Coherence & Retention, Inter-Component Coordination & State Management, Tool Usage Accuracy & Selective Execution, Multi-Step Strategic Planning & Error Detection & Recovery, and Real-Time Dynamic Responsiveness. Our findings reveal that while some architectures natively exhibit select properties, targeted augmentations significantly enhance modular agent performance—particularly in complex, multi-step, and real-time penetration testing scenarios.

From Capabilities to Performance: Evaluating Key Functional Properties of LLM Architectures in Penetration Testing

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly power mental-health chatbots, yet the field still lacks a scalable, theory-grounded way to decide which model is more effective to deploy. We present ESC-Judge, the first end-to-end evaluation framework that (i) grounds head-to-head comparison of Emotional-Support LLMs (ES-LLMs) in an established psychological theory—Clara Hill’s Exploration–Insight–Action (E-I-A) counselling model—thereby delivering a structured, interpretable lens on performance, and (ii) fully automates the pipeline at scale. ESC-Judge proceeds in three stages: (1) it synthesizes realistic help-seeker roles by sampling empirically salient attributes (stressors, personality, life history); (2) it has two candidate ES-Agents conduct separate sessions with the same role, isolating model-specific strategies; and (3) it asks a specialised judge LLM to issue pairwise preferences across rubric-anchored skills that exhaustively cover the E-I-A spectrum. In our empirical study, ESC-Judge matches PhD-level annotators in 85% of Exploration, 83% of Insight, and 86% of Action decisions, demonstrating human-level reliability at a fraction of the cost. We release all code, prompts, synthetic roles, transcripts, and judgment scripts to catalyze transparent progress in emotionally supportive AI

ESC-Judge: A Framework for Comparing Emotional Support Conversational Agents

Considering deep neural networks as manifold mappers, the pretrain-then-fine-tune paradigm can be interpreted as a two-stage process: pretrain establishes a broad knowledge base, and fine-tune adjusts the model parameters to activate specific neural pathways to align with the target manifold. Although prior fine-tuning approaches demonstrate success, their rigid parameter space limits their ability to dynamically activate appropriate neural pathways, rendering them ill-equipped to adapt flexibly to the diverse and evolving data distributions. In light of this view, we propose a novel approach, Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning (MEPT), as an effective and efficient manifold-mapping framework. MEPT leverages the Mixture of Experts architecture by integrating multiple prompt experts to adaptively learn diverse and non-stationary data distributions. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that MEPT outperforms several state-of-the-art parameter efficient baselines on SuperGLUE, achieving notable improvements in mean accuracy (e.g., 1.94%) while significantly reducing activated prompts by 79.25%. The effectiveness of MEPT is further supported by theoretical insights from manifold learning and validated through neural activation pathway visualization results.

MEPT: Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning as a Manifold Mapper

Auto-evaluating language models (LMs), *i.e*., using a grader LM to evaluate the candidate LM, is an appealing way to accelerate the evaluation process and the cost associated with it. But this presents a paradox: how can we trust the grader LM, which is presumably weaker than the candidate LM, to assess problems that are beyond the frontier of the capabilities of either model or both? For instance, today's LMs struggle on graduate-level physics and Olympiad-level math, making them unreliable graders in these domains. We show that providing *privileged information* -- such as ground-truth solutions or problem-specific guidelines -- improves automated evaluations on such frontier problems. This approach offers two key advantages. First, it expands the range of problems where LMs graders apply. Specifically, weaker models can now rate the predictions of stronger models. Second, privileged information can be used to devise easier variations of challenging problems which improves the separability of different LMs on tasks where their performance is generally low. With this approach, general-purpose LM graders match the state of the art performance on *RewardBench*, surpassing almost all the specially-tuned models. LM graders also outperform individual human raters on *Vibe-Eval*, and approach human expert graders on Olympiad-level math problems.

Graders Should Cheat: Privileged Information Enables Expert-Level Automated Evaluations

This survey explores the burgeoning field of representation convergence in foundation models, a phenomenon where diverse neural networks, despite differences in architecture, training objectives, and data modalities, increasingly learn aligned representations. We delve into the Platonic Representation Hypothesis, which posits that this convergence reflects a move towards a shared statistical model of reality. Our survey examines empirical evidence for this convergence across single modalities, including vision, language, speech, and graph data, as well as across modalities such as vision-language, speech-language, and graph-language. We further discuss the potential factors driving this convergence, such as scale, task generality, and simplicity bias. Finally, we explore the significant implications of representation convergence for multimodal learning, unified AI systems, and our understanding of intelligence, while also considering the limitations and open questions that remain in this evolving area of research.

Representation Potentials of Foundation Models for Multimodal Alignment: A Survey

Large language models (LLMs) can underpin AI assistants that help users with everyday tasks like making recommendations or performing basic computation. Despite AI assistants' promise, little is known about implicit values they display while completing everyday tasks. Humans may consider values like environmentalism, charity, and diversity. To what extent do LLMs exhibit these values in completing everyday tasks? How do they compare with humans? We answer these questions by auditing how six popular LLMs complete 30 everyday tasks, comparing LLMs to each other and to 100 human crowdworkers from the US. We find LLMs often do not align with humans, nor with other LLMs, in the implicit values exhibited.

Implicit Values Embedded in How Humans and LLMs Complete Subjective Everyday Tasks

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly serve diverse global audiences, making it critical for responsible AI deployment across cultures. While recent works have proposed various approaches to enhance cultural alignment in LLMs, a systematic analysis of their evaluation benchmarks remains needed. We propose a novel framework that conceptualizes alignment along three dimensions: Cultural Group (who to align with), Cultural Elements (what to align), and Awareness Scope (how to align). Through this framework, we analyze 105 cultural alignment evaluation benchmarks, revealing significant imbalances: Region (37.9%) and Language (28.9%) dominate Cultural Group representation; Social and Political Relations (25.1%) and Speech and Language (20.9%) concentrate Cultural Elements coverage; and an overwhelming majority (97.1%) of datasets adopt majority-focused Awareness Scope approaches. In a case study examining AI safety evaluation across nine Asian countries (Section 5), we demonstrate how our framework reveals critical gaps between existing benchmarks and real-world cultural biases identified in the study, providing actionable guidance for developing more comprehensive evaluation resources tailored to specific deployment contexts.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES