China

Disagreement detection is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in analyzing online discussions and social media content. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant advancements across various NLP tasks. However, the performance of LLM in disagreement detection is limited by two issues: *conceptual gap* and *reasoning gap*. In this paper, we propose a novel two-stage framework, Concept Alignment and Reasoning Enhancement (CARE), to tackle the issues. The first stage, Concept Alignment, addresses the gap between expert and model by performing **sub-concept taxonomy extraction**, aligning the model&#39;s comprehension with human experts. The second stage, Reasoning Enhancement, improves the model&#39;s reasoning capabilities by introducing curriculum learning workflow, which includes **rationale to critique** and **counterfactual to detection** for reducing spurious association. Extensive experiments on disagreement detection task demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, showing superior performance in zero-shot and supervised learning settings, both within and across domains.

EMNLP 2025

CARE: A Disagreement Detection Framework with Concept Alignment and Reasoning Enhancement

Disagreement detection is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in analyzing online discussions and social media content. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant advancements across various NLP tasks. However, the performance of LLM in disagreement detection is limited by two issues: *conceptual gap* and *reasoning gap*. In this paper, we propose a novel two-stage framework, Concept Alignment and Reasoning Enhancement (CARE), to tackle the issues. The first stage, Concept Alignment, addresses the gap between expert and model by performing **sub-concept taxonomy extraction**, aligning the model's comprehension with human experts. The second stage, Reasoning Enhancement, improves the model's reasoning capabilities by introducing curriculum learning workflow, which includes **rationale to critique** and **counterfactual to detection** for reducing spurious association. Extensive experiments on disagreement detection task demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, showing superior performance in zero-shot and supervised learning settings, both within and across domains.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Regular updates are essential for maintaining up-to-date knowledge in large language models (LLMs). However, existing training-based model editing methods often struggle to effectively incorporate new knowledge while preserving unrelated general knowledge. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework called Geometric Knowledge Editing (GeoEdit). GeoEdit utilizes the geometric relationships of parameter updates from fine-tuning to differentiate between neurons associated with new knowledge updates and those related to general knowledge perturbations. By employing a direction-aware knowledge identification method, we avoid updating neurons with directions approximately orthogonal to existing knowledge, thus preserving the model's generalization ability. For the remaining neurons, we integrate both old and new knowledge for aligned directions and apply a ``forget-then-learn'' editing strategy for opposite directions. Additionally, we introduce an importance-guided task vector fusion technique that filters out redundant information and provides adaptive neuron-level weighting, further enhancing model editing performance. Extensive experiments on two publicly available datasets demonstrate the superiority of GeoEdit over existing state-of-the-art methods.

GeoEdit: Geometric Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive results on advanced mathematics benchmarks but sometimes fail on basic arithmetic tasks, raising the question of whether they have truly grasped fundamental arithmetic rules or are merely relying on pattern matching. To unravel this issue, we systematically probe LLMs’ understanding of two-integer addition (0 to 2⁶⁴) by testing three crucial properties: commutativity (A+B=B+A), representation invariance via symbolic remapping (e.g., 7mapsto Y), and consistent accuracy scaling with operand length. Our evaluation of 12 leading LLMs reveals a stark disconnect: while models achieve high numeric accuracy (73.8–99.8\%), they systematically fail these diagnostics. Specifically, accuracy plummets to le 7.5\% with symbolic inputs, commutativity is violated in up to 20\% of cases, and accuracy scaling is non-monotonic. Interventions further expose this pattern-matching reliance: explicitly providing rules degrades performance by 29.49\%, while prompting for explanations before answering merely maintains baseline accuracy. These findings demonstrate that current LLMs address elementary addition via pattern matching, not robust rule induction, motivating new diagnostic benchmarks and innovations in model architecture and training to cultivate genuine mathematical reasoning.

Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Addition? A Rule-Focused Diagnostic Using Two-Integer Arithmetic

Recent studies on hallucination in large language models (LLMs) have been actively progressing in natural language processing. However, the impact of negated text on hallucination with LLMs remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we set three important yet unanswered research questions and aim to address them. To derive the answers, we investigate whether LLMs can recognize contextual shifts caused by negation and still reliably distinguish hallucinations comparable to affirmative cases. We also design the NegHalu dataset by reconstructing existing hallucination detection datasets with negated expressions. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs struggle to detect hallucinations in negated text effectively, often producing logically inconsistent or unfaithful judgments. Moreover, we trace the internal state of LLMs as they process negated inputs at the token level and reveal the challenges of mitigating their unintended effects.

The Impact of Negated Text on Hallucination with Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the capability to refine their generated answers through self-correction, enabling continuous performance improvement over multiple rounds. However, the mechanisms underlying how and why accuracy evolves during this iterative process remain unexplored. To fill this gap, we propose a probabilistic theory to model the dynamics of accuracy change and explain the performance improvements observed in multi-round self-correction. Through mathematical derivation, we establish that the accuracy after the tth round of self-correction is given by: Acct = Upp - αt(Upp - Acc₀), where Acc₀ denotes the initial accuracy, Upp represents the upper bound of accuracy convergence, and α determines the rate of convergence. Based on our theory, these parameters can be calculated and the predicted accuracy curve then can be obtained through only a single round of self-correction. Extensive experiments across diverse models and datasets demonstrate that our theoretical predictions align closely with empirical accuracy curves, validating the effectiveness of the theory. Our work provides a theoretical foundation for understanding LLM self-correction, thus paving the way for further explorations.

A Probabilistic Inference Scaling Theory for LLM Self-Correction

Final-answer-based metrics are commonly used for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on math word problems, often taken as proxies for reasoning ability. However, such metrics conflate two distinct sub-skills: abstract formulation (capturing mathematical relationships using expressions) and arithmetic computation (executing the calculations). Through a disentangled evaluation on GSM8K and SVAMP, we find that the final-answer accuracy of Llama-3 and Qwen2.5 (1B-32B) without CoT is overwhelmingly bottlenecked by the arithmetic computation step and not by the abstract formulation step. Contrary to the common belief, we show that CoT primarily aids in computation, with limited impact on abstract formulation. Mechanistically, we show that these two skills are composed conjunctively even in a single forward pass without any reasoning steps via an abstract-then-compute mechanism: models first capture problem abstractions, then handle computation. Causal patching confirms these abstractions are present, transferable, composable, and precede computation. These behavioural and mechanistic findings highlight the need for disentangled evaluation to accurately assess LLM reasoning and to guide future improvements.

Can LLMs Reason Abstractly Over Math Word Problems Without CoT? Disentangling Abstract Formulation From Arithmetic Computation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong calibration capabilities, where predicted probabilities align well with correctness, despite prior findings that deep neural networks are often overconfident. Recent studies have linked this behavior to specific components in the final layer, such as entropy neurons and the unembedding matrix’s null space. In this work, we provide a complementary perspective by investigating how calibration evolves throughout the network's depth. Analyzing multiple open-weight models on the MMLU benchmark, we uncover a distinct confidence correction phase in the upper/later layers, where model confidence is actively recalibrated after decision certainty has been reached. Furthermore, we identify a low-dimensional calibration direction in the residual stream whose perturbation significantly improves calibration metrics (ECE and MCE) without harming accuracy. Our findings suggest that calibration is a distributed phenomenon, shaped throughout the network’s forward pass, not just in its final projection, providing new insights into how confidence-regulating mechanisms operate within LLMs.

Calibration Across Layers: Understanding Calibration Evolution in LLMs

Code-mixed text—where multiple languages are used within the same utterance—is increasingly common in both spoken and written communication. However, it presents significant challenges for machine learning models due to the interplay of distinct grammatical structures, effectively forming a hybrid language. While fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3, or Llama-3 on code-mixed data has led to performance improvements, these models still lag behind their monolingual counterparts and incur high computational costs due to the large number of trainable parameters. In this paper, we focus on the task of sentiment detection in code-mixed text and propose a Hybrid Language Model (HLM) that combines a multilingual encoder (e.g., mBERT) with a lightweight decoder (e.g., Sarvam-1) (< 3B parameters). Despite having significantly fewer trainable parameters, HLM achieves sentiment classification performance comparable to that of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) (>7B) parameters). Furthermore, our results demonstrate that HLM significantly outperforms models trained individually, underscoring its effectiveness for low-resource, code-mixed sentiment analysis.

Power doesn't reside in size: A Low Parameter Hybrid Language Model (HLM) for Sentiment Analysis in Code-mixed data

Large Language Models (LLMs), despite their remarkable capabilities, are hampered by hallucinations. A particularly challenging variant, knowledge overshadowing, occurs when one piece of activated knowledge inadvertently masks another relevant piece, leading to erroneous outputs even with high-quality training data. Current understanding of overshadowing is largely confined to inference-time observations, lacking deep insights into its origins and internal mechanisms during model training. Therefore, we introduce **PhantomCircuit, a novel framework designed to comprehensively analyze and detect knowledge overshadowing.** By innovatively employing knowledge circuit analysis, PhantomCircuit dissects the internal workings of attention heads, tracing how competing knowledge pathways contribute to the overshadowing phenomenon and its evolution throughout the training process. Extensive experiments demonstrate PhantomCircuit’s effectiveness in identifying such instances, offering novel insights into this elusive hallucination and providing the research community with a new methodological lens for its potential mitigation.

Pierce the Mists, Greet the Sky: Decipher Knowledge Overshadowing via Knowledge Circuit Analysis

Methods for learning taxonomies from data have been widely studied. We study a specific version of this task, called commonality identification, where only the set of entities is given and we need to find meaningful ways to group those entities. While LLMs should intuitively excel at this task, it is difficult to directly use such models in large domains. In this paper, we instead use LLMs to describe the different properties that are satisfied by each of the entities individually. We then use pre-trained embeddings to cluster these properties, and finally group entities that have properties which belong to the same cluster. To achieve good results, it is paramount that the properties predicted by the LLM are sufficiently diverse. We find that this diversity can be improved by prompting the LLM to structure the predicted properties into different facets of knowledge.

Grouping Entities with Shared Properties using Multi-Facet Prompting and Property Embeddings

While Knowledge Editing has been extensively studied in monolingual settings, it remains underexplored in multilingual contexts. This survey systematizes recent research on Multilingual Knowledge Editing (MKE), a growing subdomain of model editing focused on ensuring factual edits generalize reliably across languages. We present a comprehensive taxonomy of MKE methods, covering parameter-based, memory-based, fine-tuning, and hypernetwork approaches. We survey available benchmarks, summarize key findings on method effectiveness and transfer patterns, identify challenges in cross-lingual propagation, and highlight open problems related to language anisotropy, evaluation coverage, and edit scalability. Our analysis consolidates a rapidly evolving area and lays the groundwork for future progress in editable language-aware LLMs.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

GeoEdit: Geometric Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES