China

Multimodal misinformation, encompassing textual, visual, and cross-modal distortions, poses an increasing societal threat that is amplified by generative AI. Existing methods typically focus on a single type of distortion and struggle to generalize to unseen scenarios. In this work, we observe that different distortion types share common reasoning capabilities while also requiring task-specific skills. We hypothesize that joint training across distortion types facilitates knowledge sharing and enhances the model’s ability to generalize. To this end, we introduce TRUST-VL, a unified and explainable vision-language model for general multimodal misinformation detection. TRUST-VL incorporates a novel Question-Aware Visual Amplifier module, designed to extract task-specific visual features. To support training, we also construct TRUST-Instruct, a large-scale instruction dataset containing 198K samples featuring structured reasoning chains aligned with human fact-checking workflows. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and zero-shot benchmarks demonstrate that TRUST-VL achieves state-of-the-art performance, while also offering strong generalization and interpretability.

EMNLP 2025

TRUST-VL: An Explainable News Assistant for General Multimodal Misinformation Detection

technical paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in vision-language understanding. Recently, with the integration of test-time scaling techniques, these models have also shown strong potential in visual reasoning. However, most existing reasoning approaches remain text-level in nature: MLLMs are prompted to explore various combinations of textual tokens via their underlying language model, while the visual input remains fixed throughout the reasoning process. This paradigm limits the model’s ability to fully exploit rich visual information, particularly when dealing with images containing numerous fine-grained elements. In such cases, vision-level reasoning becomes crucial---where models dynamically zoom into specific regions of the image to gather detailed visual cues necessary for accurate decision-making. In this paper, we propose Zoom Eye, a training-free, model-agnostic tree search algorithm tailored for vision-level reasoning. Zoom Eye treats an image as a hierarchical tree structure, where each child node represents a zoomed-in sub-region of its parent, and the root corresponds to the full image. The algorithm enables MLLMs to simulate human-like zooming behavior by navigating from root to leaf nodes in search of task-relevant visual evidence. We experiment on a series of elaborate high-resolution benchmarks and the results demonstrate that Zoom Eye not only consistently improves the performance of a series of MLLMs with large margin~(e.g., InternVL2.5-8B increases by 15.71% and 17.69% on HR-Bench) but also enables small 3-8B MLLMs to outperform strong large models such as GPT-4o.

ZoomEye: Enhancing Multimodal LLMs with Human-Like Zooming Capabilities through Tree-Based Image Exploration

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs, increasing computational overhead. Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection, which fails to remove redundant content thoroughly. To address these limitations, this work begins by framing two key patterns of redundant reflection in LRMs—textitConfidence Deficit, wherein the model reflects on correct intermediate steps, and textitTermination Delay, where reflection continues after a verified, confident answer—through a confidence-guided perspective. Based on this, we introduce textbfConCISE (textbfConfidence-guided textbfCompression textbfIn textbfStep-by-step textbfEfficient Reasoning), a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating textitConfidence Injection to boost reasoning confidence, and textitEarly Stopping to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient. Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to baseline methods, fine-tuning LRMs on textbfConCISE-generated data yields a better balance between compression and task performance, reducing length by up to ～50\% under SimPO, while maintaining high task accuracy.

ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning

Understanding the underlying argumentative flow in analytic argumentative writing is essential for discourse comprehension, especially in complex argumentative discourse such as think-tank commentary. However, existing structure modeling approaches often rely on surface-level topic segmentation, failing to capture the author’s rhetorical intent and reasoning process. To address this limitation, we propose a Question-Focus discourse structuring framework that explicitly models the underlying argumentative flow by anchoring each argumentative unit to a guiding question (reflecting the author’s intent) and a set of attentional foci (highlighting analytical pathways). To assess its effectiveness, we introduce an argument reconstruction task in which the modeled discourse structure guides both evidence retrieval and argument generation. We construct a high-quality dataset comprising 600 authoritative Chinese think-tank articles for experimental analysis. To quantitatively evaluate performance, we propose two novel metrics: (1) Claim Coverage, measuring the proportion of original claims preserved or similarly expressed in reconstructions, and (2) Evidence Coverage, assessing the completeness of retrieved supporting evidences. Experimental results show that our framework uncovers the author’s argumentative logic more effectively and offers better structural guidance for reconstruction, yielding up to a 10\% gain in claim coverage and outperforming strong baselines across both curated and LLM-based metrics.

Uncovering Argumentative Flow: A Question-Focus Discourse Structuring Framework

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated significant potential for addressing complex tasks through mechanisms such as chain-of-thought reasoning and tool invocation. However, current frameworks lack explicit supervision during the reasoning process, which may lead to error propagation across reasoning chains and hinder the optimization of intermediate decision-making stages. This paper introduces a novel framework, AgentPro, which enhances LLM agent performance by automated process supervision. AgentPro employs Monte Carlo Tree Search to automatically generate step-level annotations, and develops a process reward model based on these annotations to facilitate fine-grained quality assessment of reasoning. By employing a rejection sampling strategy, the LLM agent dynamically adjusts generation probability distributions to prevent the continuation of erroneous paths, thereby improving reasoning capabilities. Extensive experiments on four datasets indicate that our method significantly outperforms existing agent-based LLM methods (e.g., achieving a 6.32% increase in accuracy on the HotpotQA dataset), underscoring its proficiency in managing intricate reasoning chains.

AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in complex reasoning tasks, but their efficiency is hindered by the substantial memory and computational costs associated with generating lengthy tokens. In this paper, we propose LightThinker, a novel method that enables LLMs to dynamically compress intermediate thoughts during reasoning. Inspired by human cognitive processes, LightThinker compresses verbose thought steps into compact representations and discards the original reasoning chains, thereby significantly reducing the number of tokens stored in the context window.This is achieved by training the model on when and how to perform compression through data construction, mapping hidden states to condensed gist tokens, and creating specialized attention masks. Additionally, we introduce the Dependency (Dep) metric to quantify the degree of compression by measuring the reliance on historical tokens during generation. Extensive experiments on four datasets and two models show that LightThinker reduces peak memory usage and inference time, while maintaining competitive accuracy. Our work provides a new direction for improving the efficiency of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks without sacrificing performance.

LightThinker: Thinking Step-by-Step Compression

We introduce Grade School Math with Distracting Context (GSM-DC), a synthetic benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning robustness against systematically controlled irrelevant context (IC). GSM-DC constructs symbolic reasoning graphs with precise distractor injections, enabling rigorous, reproducible evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs are significantly sensitive to IC, affecting both reasoning path selection and arithmetic accuracy. Additionally, training models with strong distractors improves performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios. We further propose a stepwise tree search guided by a process reward model, which notably enhances robustness in out-of-distribution conditions.

How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled Benchmark

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning through long chain-of-thought, yet they struggle with precise computations and algorithmic operations. Integrating computational tools with LRMs remains challenging, particularly in activating and enhancing models' tool-use capabilities without compromising their reasoning strengths. We address these challenges through START (Self-taught Reasoner with Tools), introducing two key innovations: (1) Hint-infer, a training-free approach that activates LRMs' latent tool-use capabilities through artificial hints, enabling test-time performance scaling; (2) Hint-RFT, a self-training framework that enables models to learn effective tool utilization through diverse hint patterns and rejection-based data synthesis. Experiments show that START significantly improves state-of-the-art LRMs across challenging benchmarks, including competition-level mathematics (AMC23: 95.0%, AIME24: 75.6%) and graduate-level science questions (GPQA: 64.6%). Our analysis reveals that START not only enhances accuracy but also improves reasoning efficiency through strategic tool utilization, demonstrating broad applicability in complex reasoning scenarios.

START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools

In-Context Learning (ICL) has become a powerful paradigm that enables LLMs to perform a wide range of tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. However, the effectiveness of ICL heavily depends on the quality of exemplar selection. In particular, for structured prediction tasks such as semantic parsing, existing ICL selection strategies often overlook structural alignment, leading to suboptimal performance and poor generalization. To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage exemplar selection strategy that achieves a strong balance between efficiency, generalizability, and performance. First, we fine-tune a BERT-based retriever using structure-aware supervision, guiding it to select exemplars that are both semantically relevant and structurally aligned. Then, we enhance the retriever with a plug-in module, which amplifies syntactically meaningful information in the hidden representations. This plug-in is model-agnostic, requires minimal overhead, and can be seamlessly integrated into existing pipelines. Experiments on four benchmarks spanning three semantic parsing tasks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines with multiple recent LLMs as inference-time models.

STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) are no longer just language generators—they are increasingly used to simulate human behavior, perspectives, and demographic variation across social domains, from public opinion surveys to experimental research. Amid this shift, the use of LLMs to simulate historical narratives has emerged as a timely frontier. It is crucial to scrutinize the asymmetries these models embed when framing, interpreting, and retelling the past. Building on prior work that defines caricature as the combination of individuation and exaggeration, we analyze LLM-generated responses across 197 historically significant events—each featuring a directly and an indirectly affected persona. We find that LLMs reliably distinguish persona-based responses from neutral baselines, and that directly affected personas consistently exhibit higher exaggeration—amplifying identity-specific portrayals. Beyond lexical patterns, personas often frame the same event in conflicting ways—especially in military, political, and morally charged contexts. Grammatical analysis further reveals that direct personas adopt more passive constructions in institutional contexts, but shift to active framing when emotional immediacy is foregrounded. Our findings show how subtle asymmetries in tone, stance, and emphasis—not overt toxicity—can quietly, yet systematically, distort how history is told and remembered.

Who Holds the Pen? Caricature and Perspective in LLM Retellings of History

Spatial reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence. One key concept in spatial cognition is the Frame of Reference (FoR), which identifies the perspective of spatial expressions. Despite its significance, FoR has received limited attention in AI models that need spatial intelligence. There is a lack of dedicated benchmarks and in-depth evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in this area. To address this issue, we introduce the Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning Tasks (FoREST) benchmark, designed to assess FoR comprehension in LLMs. We evaluate LLMs on answering questions that require FoR comprehension and layout generation in text-to-image models using FoREST. Our results reveal a notable performance gap across different FoR classes in various LLMs, affecting their ability to generate accurate layouts for text-to-image generation. This highlights critical shortcomings in FoR comprehension. To improve FoR understanding, we propose Spatial-Guided prompting, which improves LLMs’ ability to extract essential spatial concepts. Our proposed method improves overall performance across spatial reasoning tasks.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

ZoomEye: Enhancing Multimodal LLMs with Human-Like Zooming Capabilities through Tree-Based Image Exploration

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES