China

Vision-Language Models have made significant progress on many perception-focused tasks. However, their progress on reasoning-focused tasks remains limited due to the lack of high-quality and diverse training data. In this work, we aim to address the scarcity of reasoning-focused multimodal datasets. We propose VisualWebInstruct, a novel approach that leverages search engines to create a diverse and high-quality dataset spanning multiple disciplines, including mathematics, physics, finance, and chemistry, etc. Starting with a meticulously selected set of 30,000 seed images, we employ Google Image Search to identify websites containing similar images. We collect and process HTML data from over 700K unique URLs. Through a pipeline of content extraction, filtering, and synthesis, we construct a dataset of approximately 900K question-answer (QA) pairs, with 40% consisting of visual QA pairs and the remaining comprising text-based QA pairs. Models fine-tuned on VisualWebInstruct demonstrate significant performance improvements: (1) fine-tuning on Llava-OV results in 10-20 absolute points improvement across benchmarks, and (2) fine-tuning from MAmmoTH-VL yields a 5 absolute points gain across benchmarks. Our best model, MAmmoTH-VL2, achieves the best known performance with SFT without RL within the 10B parameter class on MMMU-Pro (40.7), MathVerse (42.6), and DynaMath (55.7). These results highlight the effectiveness of our dataset in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of vision-language models for complex multimodal tasks.

EMNLP 2025

VisualWebInstruct: Scaling up Multimodal Instruction Data through Web Search

technical paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Uncertainty quantification is essential for assessing the reliability and trustworthiness of modern AI systems. Among existing approaches, verbalized uncertainty—where models express their confidence through natural language—has emerged as a lightweight and interpretable solution in large language models (LLMs). However, its effectiveness in vision-language models (VLMs) remains insufficiently studied. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of verbalized confidence in VLMs, spanning three model categories, four task domains, and three evaluation scenarios. Our results show that current VLMs often display notable miscalibration across diverse tasks and settings. Notably, visual reasoning models (i.e., thinking with images) consistently exhibit better calibration, suggesting that modality-specific reasoning is critical for reliable uncertainty estimation. To further address calibration challenges, we introduce Visual Confidence-Aware Prompting, a two-stage prompting strategy that improves confidence alignment in multimodal settings. Overall, our study highlights the inherent miscalibration in VLMs across modalities. More broadly, our findings underscore the fundamental importance of modality alignment and model faithfulness in advancing reliable multimodal systems.

Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown immense potential in improving the performance of large-scale models by effectively incorporating structured relational information. However, current approaches face two key challenges: (1) achieving robust semantic alignment between graph representations and large models, and (2) ensuring interpretability in the generated outputs. To address these challenges, we propose ExGLM (Explainable Graph Language Model), a novel training framework designed to seamlessly integrate graph and language modalities while enhancing transparency. Our framework introduces two core components: (1) a graph-language synergistic alignment module, which aligns graph structures with language model to ensure semantic consistency across modalities; and (2) a judge-and-improve paradigm, which allows the language model to iteratively evaluate, refine, and prioritize responses with higher interpretability, thereby improving both performance and transparency. Extensive experiments conducted on three benchmark datasets—ogbn-arxiv, Cora, and PubMed—demonstrate that ExGLM not only surpasses existing methods in efficiency but also generates outputs that are significantly more interpretable, effectively addressing the primary limitations of current approaches.

Judge and Improve: Towards a Better Reasoning of Knowledge Graphs with Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning and planning capabilities, driving extensive research into task decomposition. Existing task decomposition methods focus primarily on memory, tool usage, and feedback mechanisms, achieving notable success in specific domains, but they often overlook the trade-off between performance and cost. In this study, we first conduct a comprehensive investigation on task decomposition, identifying six categorization schemes. Then, we perform an empirical analysis of three factors that influence the performance and cost of task decomposition: categories of approaches, characteristics of tasks, and configuration of decomposition and execution models, uncovering three critical insights and summarizing a set of practical principles. Building on this analysis, we propose the Select-Then-Decompose strategy, which establishes a closed-loop problem-solving process composed of three stages: selection, execution, and verification. This strategy dynamically selects the most suitable decomposition approach based on task characteristics and enhances the reliability of the results through a verification module. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks show that the Select-Then-Decompose consistently lies on the Pareto frontier, demonstrating an optimal balance between performance and cost. We will release our code upon acceptance.

Select-Then-Decompose: From Empirical Analysis to Adaptive Selection Strategy for Task Decomposition in Large Language Models

The multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have attracted considerable attention over the past decade. Assessing the accuracy with which LLMs provide answers in multilingual contexts is essential for determining their level of multilingual proficiency. Nevertheless, existing multilingual benchmarks generally reveal severe drawbacks, such as overly translated content (translationese), the absence of difficulty control, constrained diversity, and disciplinary imbalance, making the benchmarking process unreliable and showing low convincingness. To alleviate those shortcomings, we introduce NOVA-63 (Native Omni-lingual Versatile Assessments of 63 Disciplines), a comprehensive, difficult multilingual benchmark featuring 93,536 questions sourced from native speakers across 14 languages and 63 academic disciplines. Leveraging a robust pipeline that integrates LLM-assisted formatting, expert quality verification, and multi-level difficulty screening, NOVA-63 is balanced on disciplines with consistent difficulty standards while maintaining authentic linguistic elements. Extensive experimentation with current LLMs has shown significant insights into cross-lingual consistency among language families, and exposed notable disparities in models' capabilities across various disciplines. This work provides valuable benchmarking data for the future development of multilingual models. Furthermore, our findings underscore the importance of moving beyond overall scores and instead conducting fine-grained analyses of model performance.

NOVA-63: Native Omni-lingual Versatile Assessments of 63 Disciplines

The extent to which individual language characteristics influence tokenization and language modeling is an open question. Differences in morphological systems have been suggested as both unimportant and crucial to consider (Cotterell et al., 2018; Gerz et al., 2018a; Park et al., 2021, inter alia). We argue this conflicting evidence is due to confounding factors in experimental setups, making it hard to compare results and draw conclusions. We identify confounding factors in analyses trying to answer the question of whether, and how, morphology relates to language modeling. Next, we re-assess three hypotheses by Arnett & Bergen (2025) for why modeling agglutinative languages results in higher perplexities than fusional languages: they look at morphological alignment of tokenization, tokenization efficiency, and dataset size. We show that each conclusion includes confounding factors. Finally, we introduce token bigram metrics as an intrinsic way to predict the difficulty of causal language modeling, and find that they are gradient proxies for morphological complexity that do not require expert annotation. Ultimately, we outline necessities to reliably answer whether, and how, morphology relates to language modeling.

 Confounding Factors in Relating Model Performance to Morphology

Tuning inference hyperparameters, such as temperature and maximum output tokens, on downstream tasks can enhance inference performance. However, directly applying hyperparameter optimization to these parameters is token-expensive. While multi-fidelity optimization improves HPO efficiency by low-fidelity evaluations, it relies on static scheduling strategies, which are unaware of token consumption, resulting in high token cost. To address these limitations, we propose a token-efficient multi-fidelity optimization method, which enhances inference performance and minimizes token usage. Our method is empowered by (i) a token-based fidelity definition with explicit token cost modeling on configurations; (ii) a novel Token-Aware Expected Improvement acquisition function that selects configurations based on performance gain per token; and (iii) a dynamic fidelity scheduling mechanism that adapts to real-time budget status. We evaluate our method on LLaMA-2 and LLaMA-3 series across MMLU, HumanEval, MedQA, and OpenBookQA. Our method improves over the HELM leaderboard by 7.1%, 24.3%, 21.9%, and 4.6%, respectively. Compared to existing multi-fidelity HPO baselines, our method reduces token consumption by over 80% while maintaining or surpassing performance, demonstrating the state-of-the-art token efficiency for inference-time optimization.

EcoTune: Token-Efficient Multi-Fidelity Hyperparameter Optimization for Large Language Model Inference

In long structured document retrieval, existing methods typically fine-tune pre-trained language models (PLMs) using contrastive learning on datasets lacking explicit structural information. This practice suffers from two critical issues: 1) current methods fail to leverage structural features and element-level semantics effectively, and 2) the lack of datasets containing structural metadata. To bridge these gaps, we propose SEAL, a novel contrastive learning framework. It leverages structure-aware learning to preserve semantic hierarchies and masked element alignment for fine-grained semantic discrimination. Furthermore, we release StructDocRetrieval, a long structured document retrieval dataset with rich structural annotations. Extensive experiments on both the released and industrial datasets across various modern PLMs, and online A/B testing demonstrate consistent improvements, boosting NDCG@10 from 73.96% to 77.84% on BGE-M3. The resources are available at this anonymous URL.

SEAL: Structure and Element Aware Learning Improves Long Structured Document Retrieval

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in flagging harmful content in online communities. Yet, existing approaches for moderation require a separate model for every community and are opaque in their decision-making, limiting real-world adoption. We introduce Mixture of Moderation Experts (MoMoE), a modular, cross-community framework that adds post-hoc explanations to enable scalable content moderation. MoMoE orchestrates four operators---Allocate, Predict, Aggregate, Explain---and is instantiated as seven community-specialized experts (MoMoE-Community) and five norm-violation experts (MoMoE-NormVio). On 30 unseen subreddits, the best variants obtain Micro-F1 scores of 0.72 and 0.67, respectively, matching or surpassing strong fine-tuned baselines while consistently producing concise and reliable explanations. Although community-specialized experts deliver the highest peak accuracy, norm-violation experts provide steadier performance across domains. These findings show that MoMoE yields scalable, transparent moderation without needing per-community fine-tuning. More broadly, they suggest that lightweight, explainable expert ensembles can guide future NLP and HCI research on trustworthy human-AI governance of online communities.

 MoMoE: Mixture of Moderation Experts Framework for AI-Assisted Online Governance

Image aesthetics is a crucial metric in the field of image generation. However, textual aesthetics has not been sufficiently explored. With the widespread application of large language models (LLMs), previous work has primarily focused on the correctness of content and the helpfulness of responses. Nonetheless, providing responses with textual aesthetics is also an important factor for LLMs, which can offer a cleaner layout and ensure greater consistency and coherence in content. In this work, we introduce a pipeline for aesthetics polishing and help construct a textual aesthetics dataset named TEXAES. We propose a textual aesthetics-powered fine-tuning method based on direct preference optimization, termed TAPO, which leverages textual aesthetics without compromising content correctness. Additionally, we develop two evaluation methods for textual aesthetics based on text and image analysis, respectively.Our experiments demonstrate that using textual aesthetics data and employing the TAPO fine-tuning method not only improves aesthetic scores but also enhances performance on general evaluation datasets such as AlpacalEval and Arena-hard.

Textual Aesthetics in Large Language Models

In recent years, protein-text models have gained significant attention for their potential in protein generation and understanding. Current approaches focus on integrating protein-related knowledge into large language models through continued pretraining and multi-modal alignment, enabling simultaneous comprehension of textual descriptions and protein sequences. Through a thorough analysis of existing model architectures and text-based protein understanding benchmarks, we identify significant data leakage issues present in current benchmarks. Moreover, conventional metrics derived from natural language processing fail to accurately assess the model's performance in this domain. To address these limitations, we reorganize existing datasets and introduce a novel evaluation framework based on biological entities. Motivated by our observation, we propose a retrieval-enhanced method, which significantly outperforms fine-tuned LLMs for protein-to-text generation and shows accuracy and efficiency in training-free scenarios. Our code and data will be available.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES