Austria

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in text generation and reasoning but still struggle with overthinking and analysis paralysis in interactive, multi-step tasks. In this paper, we introduce two complementary contributions aimed at mitigating these challenges. First, we propose Think, Validate, Consensus (TVC)---a multi-agent system inspired by Rational Speech Act (RSA) theory---that enables LLMs to recursively model each other’s mental states and detect overthinking in interactive environments. We take inspiration from RSA to model the recursive reasoning about communicative intent that underlies human collaboration, complementing models of individual reasoning. Second, we present Snap-Think, a dual-mode mechanism that combines fast, intuitive interaction (System 1) with slower, deliberative reasoning (System 2) to break free from reasoning loops detected by TVC. We evaluate our approach using New York Times Connections puzzles and demonstrate significant improvements: Snap-Think achieves 98\% solve rate on GPT-4o compared to Chain-of-Thought&#39;s 72\%, while maintaining superior semantic grounding and efficiency over traditional strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating human-inspired cognitive frameworks into LLM architectures can effectively counteract overthinking and enhance complex problem-solving capabilities. We make our code available at: https://github.com/Chrislai502/the_amazing_connections

ACL 2025

Snap Out of It: A Dual-Process Approach to Mitigating Overthinking in Language Model Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in text generation and reasoning but still struggle with overthinking and analysis paralysis in interactive, multi-step tasks. In this paper, we introduce two complementary contributions aimed at mitigating these challenges. First, we propose Think, Validate, Consensus (TVC)---a multi-agent system inspired by Rational Speech Act (RSA) theory---that enables LLMs to recursively model each other’s mental states and detect overthinking in interactive environments. We take inspiration from RSA to model the recursive reasoning about communicative intent that underlies human collaboration, complementing models of individual reasoning. Second, we present Snap-Think, a dual-mode mechanism that combines fast, intuitive interaction (System 1) with slower, deliberative reasoning (System 2) to break free from reasoning loops detected by TVC. We evaluate our approach using New York Times Connections puzzles and demonstrate significant improvements: Snap-Think achieves 98\% solve rate on GPT-4o compared to Chain-of-Thought's 72\%, while maintaining superior semantic grounding and efficiency over traditional strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating human-inspired cognitive frameworks into LLM architectures can effectively counteract overthinking and enhance complex problem-solving capabilities. We make our code available at: https://github.com/Chrislai502/the_amazing_connections

workshop paper

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration details**](https://2025.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

In this paper, we evaluate whether LLMs learn to make human-like preference judgements in strategic scenarios as compared with known empirical results. Solar and Mistral are shown to exhibit stable value-based preference consistent with humans and exhibit human-like preference for cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma (including stake-size effect) and traveler's dilemma (including penalty-size effect). We establish a relationship between model size, value-based preference, and superficiality. Finally, results here show that models tending to be less brittle have relied on sliding window attention suggesting a potential link. Additionally, we contribute a novel method for constructing preference relations from arbitrary LLMs and support for a hypothesis regarding human behavior in the traveler's dilemma.

Do Large Language Models Learn Human-Like Strategic Preferences?

While open-source large language models (LLMs) have advanced in leveraging third-party tools, significant challenges remain in real-world API usage, where behavior is unpredictable or poorly specified. Existing benchmarks often fail to capture this complexity. We propose ToolReflection, a novel method that improves LLMs’ ability to self-correct API calls by utilizing real-time API feedback. We also introduce new datasets specifically designed to test model performance under realistic conditions. In ToolReflection, models undergo instruction tuning on a dataset augmented with self-generated errors and corrections. Our evaluation across ToolAlpaca, ToolBench benchmarks, and three newly developed datasets (GPT4Tools-OOD, GPT4Tools-OOD-Hard, and Multistep-100) demonstrates its effectiveness. ToolReflection boosts overall success rates by 25.4\% on GPT4Tools-OOD, 56.2\% on GPT4Tools-OOD-Hard, and 4\% on Multistep-100, outperforming original models. On ToolAlpaca, we show a 14\% improvement in the “Simulated” setting and 10.5\% in the “Real-world” scenario. Our error analysis highlights ToolReflection significantly enhances recovery from incorrect tool calls, even with incomplete or erroneous API documentation. We have released the code, prompts, and data at https://github.com/polgrisha/ToolReflection.

ToolReflection: Improving Large Language Models for Real-World API Calls with Self-Generated Data

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is widely applied to improve the LLM capability in math, coding and reasoning tasks. However, its performance is limited for open-domain tasks since there is no clearly defined steps or transitions. To mitigate such challenges, we propose another prompt paradigm called Chain of Conceptual Thoughts (CoCT), which suggests the LLM to first produce the tag of concepts, then generate the detailed content. We experiment this paradigm in daily and emotional support conversation where the concept is comprised of emotions and strategies. Both human, automatic and model evaluation suggest that CoCT surpasses both direct, CoT and finetuning baselines, suggesting a potential solution of LLM prompting paradigm for wider scope of tasks.

Chain-of-Conceptual-Thought Elicits Daily Conversation in Large Language Models

In e-commerce, behavioral data is collected for decision making which can be costly and slow. Simulation with LLM powered agents is emerging as a promising alternative for representing human population behavior. However, LLMs are known to exhibit certain biases, such as brand bias, review rating bias and limited representation of certain groups in the population, hence they need to be carefully benchmarked and aligned to user behavior. Ultimately, our goal is to synthesise an agent population and verify that it collectively approximates a real sample of humans. To this end, we propose a framework that: (i) creates synthetic shopping agents by automatically mining personas from anonymised historical shopping data, (ii) equips agents with retail-specific tools to synthesise shopping sessions and (iii) introduces a novel alignment suite measuring distributional differences between humans and shopping agents at the group (i.e. population) level rather than the traditional ``individual'' level. Experimental results demonstrate that using personas improves performance on the alignment suite, though a gap remains to human behaviour. We showcase an initial application of our framework for automated agentic A/B testing and compare the findings to human results. Finally, we discuss applications, limitations and challenges setting the stage for impactful future work.

PAARS: Persona Aligned Agentic Retail Shoppers

Agentic systems powered by large language models (LLMs) are becoming progressively more complex and capable. Their increasing agency and expanding deployment settings attract growing attention to effective governance policies, monitoring, and control protocols. Based on the emerging landscape of the agentic market, we analyze potential liability issues arising from the delegated use of LLM agents and their extended systems through a principal-agent perspective. Our analysis complements existing risk-based studies on artificial agency and covers the spectrum of important aspects of the principal-agent relationship and their potential consequences at deployment. Furthermore, we motivate method developments for technical governance along the directions of interpretability and behavior evaluations, reward and conflict management, and the mitigation of misalignment and misconduct through principled engineering of detection and fail-safe mechanisms. By illustrating the outstanding issues in AI liability for LLM-based agentic systems, we aim to inform the system design, auditing, and monitoring approaches to enhancing transparency and accountability.

Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective

The rapid proliferation of heterogeneous data in government and industry presents increasing challenges for users seeking to retrieve actionable insights across both structured and unstructured sources. To address this, this paper presents InfoTech Assistant, a novel multimodal conversational framework that enables natural language interaction with both semantic document retrieval and structured database querying. The system integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and schema-aware Text-to-SQL capabilities, enabling dual-mode processing of user input for unstructured explanations and relational analytics. The architecture features a modular, locally deployed backend built with Flask and optimized for Graphics Processor Unit (GPU) acceleration, supporting low latency, privacy preserving inference. User queries are dynamically routed through an intent-aware processing pipeline, leveraging sentence embeddings, schema metadata, and prompt engineering strategies. A pilot deployment using infrastructure datasets from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) InfoHighway portal demonstrates the system’s effectiveness in real-world domain-specific retrieval. The assistant ingests FHWA technology documents and National Bridge Inventory (NBI) text records, tables, and images organized in a hybrid schema supporting both semantic and SQL-driven interaction. Evaluation results show 95\% accuracy in RAG-based semantic tasks and 88.6\% success in translating natural language into executable SQL queries. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid LLM-based agents for scalable, secure knowledge access in critical public-sector and industrial applications.

A Conversational Agent Framework for Multimodal Knowledge Retrieval: A Case Study in FHWA InfoHighway Web Portal Queries

Recent works have demonstrated that incorporating search during inference can significantly improve reasoning capabilities of language agents. Some approaches may make use of the ground truth or rely on model's own generated feedback. The search algorithm uses this feedback to then produce values that will update its criterion for exploring and exploiting various reasoning paths. In this study, we investigate how search and model's self-feedback can be leveraged for reasoning tasks. First, we explore differences in ground-truth feedback and self-feedback during search for math reasoning. Second, we observe limitations in applying search techniques to more complex tasks like tool-calling and design domain-specific approaches to address these gaps. Our experiments reveal challenges related to generalization when solely relying on self-feedback during search. For search to work effectively, either access to the ground-truth is needed or feedback mechanisms need to be carefully designed for the specific task.

A Study on Leveraging Search and Self-Feedback for Agent Reasoning

As mobile devices become central to modern life, elderly users often struggle with their complexity, leading to digital divide. This paper explores how the integration of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) principles and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can enhance the way elderly users learn to use smartphones. To demonstrate this approach, we present AgeMate, a prototype mobile agent designed to support seniors in acquiring smartphone skills more intuitively and effectively. Specifically, we investigate how personalized feedback generated by large language models (LLMs), appropriate granularity in instructional content, and mechanisms for preventing and correcting user errors can contribute to more adaptive and user-friendly learning experiences for elderly users. Rather than focusing solely on system performance, our study emphasizes the instructional value of NLP-enhanced interaction: enabling step-by-step, conversational teaching tailored to users’ real-time context. By analyzing usage patterns and interaction challenges, we propose design strategies that bridge the gap between accessibility and intelligent guidance to better support elderly users in digital environments.

Bridging the Digital Divide: Empowering Elderly Smartphone Users with Intelligent and Human-Centered Design in Agemate

Modern web agents possess computer use abilities that allow them to interact with webpages by sending commands to a virtual keyboard and mouse. While such agents have considerable potential to assist human users with complex tasks, evaluating their capabilities in real-world settings poses a major challenge. To this end, we introduce BEARCUBS, a "small but mighty" benchmark of 111 information-seeking questions designed to evaluate a web agent's ability to search, browse, and identify factual information from the web. Unlike prior web agent benchmarks, solving BEARCUBS requires (1) accessing live web content rather than synthetic or simulated pages, which captures the unpredictability of real-world web interactions; and (2) performing a broad range of multimodal interactions (e.g., video understanding, 3D navigation) that cannot be bypassed via text-based workarounds. Each question in BEARCUBS has a corresponding short, unambiguous answer and a human-validated browsing trajectory, allowing for transparent evaluation of agent performance and strategies. A human study confirms that BEARCUBS questions are solvable but non-trivial (84.7% human accuracy), revealing search inefficiencies and domain knowledge gaps as common failure points. By contrast, state-of-the-art computer-using agents underperform, with the best-scoring system (OpenAI's Operator) reaching only 24.3% accuracy. These results highlight critical areas for improvement, including reliable source selection and more powerful multimodal capabilities. To facilitate future research, BEARCUBS will be updated periodically to replace invalid or contaminated questions, keeping the benchmark fresh for future generations of web agents.

BEARCUBS: A benchmark for computer-using web agents

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in critical domains, but their vulnerability to jailbreak attacks remains a significant concern. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent, multi-turn jailbreak strategy that systematically bypasses LLM safety mechanisms by decomposing harmful queries into seemingly benign sub-tasks. Built upon a role-based agentic framework consisting of a Question Decomposer, a Sub-Question Answerer, and an Answer Combiner, we demonstrate how LLMs can be manipulated to generate prohibited content without prompt manipulations. Our results show a drastic increase in attack success, often exceeding 90% across various LLMs, including GPT-3.5-Turbo, Gemma-2-9B, and Mistral-7B. We further analyze attack consistency across multiple runs and vulnerability across content categories. Compared to existing widely used jailbreak techniques, our multi-agent method consistently achieves the highest attack success rate across all evaluated models. These findings reveal a critical flaw in the current safety architecture of multi-agent LLM systems: their lack of holistic context awareness. By revealing this weakness, we argue for an urgent need to develop multi-turn, context-aware, and robust defenses to address this emerging threat vector.

Snap Out of It: A Dual-Process Approach to Mitigating Overthinking in Language Model Reasoning

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Do Large Language Models Learn Human-Like Strategic Preferences?

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Snap Out of It: A Dual-Process Approach to Mitigating Overthinking in Language Model Reasoning

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Do Large Language Models Learn Human-Like Strategic Preferences?

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Downloads