CogSci 2025

August 01, 2025

San Francisco, United States

Would you like to see your presentation here, made available to a global audience of researchers?
Add your own presentation or have us affordably record your next conference.

keywords:

cognitive neuroscience

psychology

phonology

representation

linguistics

Recent research has compared representation models of word meaning (Brown et al., 2023, Cognitive Science 47:e13291), however, less research has compared representation models of words’ perceptual features. Thus, we compared vector-space word representation models that can be used to quantify words’ phonological similarity. The main structure of the model was adapted from Cox et al.’s orthographic representation model (Behavior Research Methods 43:602-15, 2011). Variations of the model included phonetic mapping scheme, encoding scheme, the inclusion of lexical stress, and the combination of orthographic and phonological representations. We tested the model variants against human-rated phonological similarity and both phonological and orthographic Damerau-Levenshtein distance. Open n-gram encoding (1 ≤ n ≤ 2) performed better overall than terminal relative encoding across all phonological similarity metrics. Concatenated orthographic-phonological vectors improved the prediction of human ratings with terminal-relative encoding only. Using more fine-grained phonetic mapping or including lexical stress had minimal effects.

Downloads

PaperTranscript English (automatic)

Next from CogSci 2025

The Effect of Timescale Dependence on Dyadic Interactions
poster

The Effect of Timescale Dependence on Dyadic Interactions

CogSci 2025

Gabriel Severino and 2 other authors

01 August 2025

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Presentations
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2026 Underline - All rights reserved