United Kingdom

This breakout session will explore how Libraries and Learning Resources at the University of Birmingham is supporting the research community’s use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) following the emergence of Narrow and Generative AI technologies. It will explore how a collaboration between the Research Skills Team and Copyright and Licensing Team developed an evaluative framework to empower researchers to self-evaluate an AI Tool, and how this framework became central to a new training session for the 23/24 academic year. We will also discuss the influence this has had on broader institutional activity guiding the use of AI in research.

UKSG Annual Conference 2025

AI Tools in Academic Research: empowering AI literacy in the research community with an evaluative framework

technical paper

The UKSG Annual Conference is a major event in the scholarly communications calendar which attracts delegates each year from around the world - librarians, publishers, content providers, consultants and intermediaries.

Books have long lived in the shade of journal articles when it comes to institutional strategies and funder policies for open access. However, books are essential scholarly formats across many disciplines, so there is a demand to develop institutional strategies. Libraries are at the heart of such developments. But where should librarians begin, how should they advance, and what should they consider if they want to develop such strategies?

Libraries worldwide are updating their collection development policies to evaluate and invest in open access programs. They are also leading campus conversations to help faculty book authors realise the advantages of open access dissemination and align with any national or private funder mandates. This session brings together perspectives from institutions, libraries, and research funders on open access policies for books to share their observations and experiences. The emphasis is on practical recommendations to ensure that books don’t get “left behind” in a global move towards open research.

The session will particularly highlight the evidence-based work of the PALOMERA project (https://operas-eu.org/projects/palomera/), which has researched policies and strategies for open access books in 39 countries in the European Research Area. Based on an extensive open data collection and deep systematic analysis of the data, the project has developed actionable recommendations for eight stakeholder groups, including libraries and research funders.

Open Access for Books: The Role of Libraries in a Changing Policy Landscape

Our goal is to discuss how a form of publishing which emerged in the analogue C20th is now being challenged by the digital C21st. Journals are no longer the only platform for trusted research. Preprint servers, reports on open websites, blogposts, podcasts and videos are all options for today’s researcher. Yet many funders and most universities still rely on game-able journals and their indexes for funding awards and career advancement. Covid showed that journals are too slow and too rigid for a digital-first environment, something that research institutions outside the academy, like IGOs, NGOs and think tanks, have understood. Today, they self-publish their research findings, rapidly, cheaply and openly on their websites without the need for journals and in so doing capture valuable reputational kudos – so why not universities too? Yet there are downsides to these C21st, informal, publication choices: poor metadata and unstable websites makes this content hard to discover and preserve. In this session, you’re invited to join our expert panellists in discussing the pros and cons of different publishing options in today’s digital-first environment.

This house believes journals are no longer the only publishing option

Do your Library teams struggle to stay in touch with each other? Do your staff sometimes not know the function of other teams within your Libraries, and who to turn to with a problem?

The University of Nottingham Libraries Training and Development team saw just that, and wanted an engaging way to combat it. Thus our Libraries Job Shadowing scheme was born.

Job Shadowing is a way for staff to spend time with another team, learning what they do and providing the lightbulb moments when the pieces of the Library jigsaw fall into place. The scheme upskills staff and improves staff engagement, but also promotes cross team collaboration

Beyond the Stacks: A Sneak Peek into Library Staff Engagement with Job Shadowing

In May 2023, University of Aberdeen became one of the first institutions in the UK to institute a Rights Retention policy for research articles. As we, the Open Research Team, now look to expand the policy to longform publications, we need to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy and our outreach activities about it. It soon became clear that there was no one source of data that could tell us how well Rights Retention was working. In this presentation, we will look at a variety of data sources, (Pure reporting, OpenAlex, web and service analytics, and internal feedback) and consider their usefulness in evaluating new policies.

Evaluating Rights Retention, almost two years on

This paper emphasises the need for strategic approaches to boost scholarly publishing and literacy in African academic institutions. Despite the potential of scholarly publishing to enhance scholarly communication, African content remains underrepresented due to factors like low digital literacy, inadequate training, limited internet access, and high subscription costs. The paper proposes several strategies, including developing digital infrastructure, fostering global collaborations, enhancing training programmes, and advocating for policy changes. By implementing these strategies, African scholars can improve digital content creation and visibility, ultimately benefiting teaching, research, and the global digital economy.

Adopting strategic approaches to increase scholarly publishing and digital literacy in African academic and research institutions

Those involved in running community-led infrastructures and funding models that support Diamond open access will be familiar with questions being repeatedly raised about the sustainability of their work. In this breakout session, we will hear short talks from five initiatives that are engaging directly with this question, in relation to both open access books and journals, even as they sometimes push back against its often unspoken assumptions. Each contributor will unpack what “achieving sustainability” means for them, including reporting on their concrete progress in support of this work, in their own terms, as well as potentially highlighting the limits of understanding sustainability as merely financial. Panellists will also reflect on developments in the broader scholarly system that potentially both are a challenge for their work and present opportunities. This will be followed by questions from the audience.

Scaling Sustainability: Open Book Collective and Community-led Open Access – Joe Deville, Open Book Collective / Lancaster University

From the Back of the Sofa to the Budget Line: Sustainability at Opening the Future – Kira Hopkins, Copim Opening the Future / Birkbeck, University of London

Why we need a Big Deal for Diamond Open Access Journals – Caroline Edwards, Open Library of Humanities / Birkbeck, University of London

Sustaining open metadata as a public good: benefits and challenges – Rupert Gatti, Thoth Open Metadata and Open Book Publishers

Sustainable Principles: POSI in Practice – Niels Stern, Directory of Open Access Books & OAPEN

It’s Nice, but is it sustainable? Rethinking sustainability for Diamond open access infrastructures and funding models

Open Science is gaining momentum in Africa as a movement to make scientific research more accessible, transparent and inclusive. However, the practice of open science within the region is at different stages of development requiring Librarians to play an active role in the advocacy for open science and open data management best practices. This paper reviews the state of Open Science in Africa and examine lessons learnt from the AfLIA Open Data Management Foundational Course for African Librarians.

Advancing Open Science in Africa: Lessons from the AfLIA Open Data Management Foundational Course for African Librarians

In light of the Jisc Review of TA agreements, financial pressures faced by HE sector (UK) and uncertainty of block grant support, the sector is as a turning point. Without knowing what comes next we must continue working to analyse the deals to determine what we want and do not want from any future iterations. This session will discuss how we analyse these deals including the use of Unsub and EZProxy. We have begun to adapt our processes and will provide an overview of how we have established our data requirements and created a framework for assessing deals.

Using data to analyse Read and Publish deals and a look to how we adapt our processes in a post TA future/world

With frozen budgets and more financial pressure than ever before we need to show value for money on every purchase. Evidence-based decision making for resource acquisition has always been high strategic priority for the library this paper seeks to illustrate how linking disparate datasets can illustrate and enhance value for money purchasing. We will present four mini-case studies using datasets from JUSP, Reading lists, Alma and OpenAthens. We will explore some data modelling and various ways to visualise the stories emerging from the data and how these feed library conversations both internally and with the wider university.

Not just JUSP. Beyond the silos, making datasets sing to each other

Libraries are increasing becoming involved in publishing in ways that have the potential to bring about change in scholarly communications. From setting up new presses, to providing financial support as well as advocating for open research within institutions, librarians are key to realising a new future for academic publishing.

But much of this work is happening in siloes, split across roles or taking place across different professional departments. There is a lack of a coherent vision for a credible alternative to the status quo and no clear division of labour or allocation of responsibility. This panel explores the way forward to effect positive change.

Realising a New Vision for Academic Publishing: How
Open Institutional Publishers and Libraries are Working Together to Bring About Change in Scholarly Communications

AI Tools in Academic Research: empowering AI literacy in the research community with an evaluative framework

Downloads

Next from UKSG Annual Conference 2025

Open Access for Books: The Role of Libraries in a Changing Policy Landscape

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

AI Tools in Academic Research: empowering AI literacy in the research community with an evaluative framework

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from UKSG Annual Conference 2025

Open Access for Books: The Role of Libraries in a Changing Policy Landscape

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES

Downloads