
Premium content
Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

poster
Surgical Management of Pontine Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Emphasizing Safe Entry Zones and Clinical Outcomes
Background Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCM) are challenging lesions to treat surgically due to their eloquent location and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Safe entry zones (SEZs) have emerged as important corridors for accessing these lesions while minimizing morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the surgical management of pontine BSCM with a focus on SEZs, clinical presentation, lesion characteristics, surgical approach, and clinical outcomes. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed for articles published from 1986 to June 2024 reporting on the surgical management of pontine BSCM. Data were extracted on patient demographics, clinical presentation, BSCM characteristics, surgical approach, use of SEZs, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with improved outcomes. Results Fifty-seven studies with a total of 490 patients were included. The cohort was 54% female with an average age of 33.42±17.7 years. The most common presenting symptoms varied by location. Symptoms associated with a particular anatomical distribution included hemiparesis (p=.0128), hemipaesthesia (p=.0125) and diplopia (p=.001) in basilar pons, CN V palsy (p=.0140) in peritrigeminal pons, CN VII (p=.0247), CN IX (p=.001), CN X (p=.001) and vertigo (p=.006) in the inferior peduncular pons and tetraspasticity (p=.001) in the rhomboid pons. The two most common BSCM locations were peritrigeminal (31.25%) and rhomboid (33.13%). The average major diameter of BSCM was 19.05±8.75 mm and 5.3% of BSCM were developmental venous anomalies. The most frequently used surgical approaches were the suboccipital telovelar approach (31.8%), the retrosigmoid approach (18.7%), and the transpetrosal approach (6.05%) and the most commonly utilized SEZ was the lateral pontine zone (LPZ) (34.1%). Average follow-up was 4.0±4.4 years. Overall, gross total resection was achieved in 65.6% of cases, in cases utilizing the LPZ gross total resection was achieved in 82.8% of cases. Good clinical outcome (follow-up mRS<2) was observed in 64.1% of patients, with an overall mortality rate of 1.0%. The use of SEZs for pontine BSCM was associated with improved clinical outcome (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.279-4.546, p=.006). BSCM located in the middle peduncular pons were associated with an improved clinical outcome (OR: 6.759, 95% CI: 2.322-19.673, p=.0005), while BSCM located in the basilar pons were associated with a worse clinical outcome (OR:0.075, 95% CI: 0.010-0.584, p=.0133). Conclusion Surgical resection of pontine BSCM can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates when utilizing SEZs and careful preoperative planning. The lateral pontine, supratrigeminal, and peritrigeminal SEZs are associated with high rates of complete resection and improved neurological outcomes. BSCM location dictates the choice of SEZ and surgical approach, emphasizing the importance of understanding the regional anatomy of the brainstem. Future studies with standardized reporting and longer follow-ups are needed to further refine surgical techniques, patient selection, and stratify outcomes based on anatomical distribution.