Lecture image placeholder

Premium content

Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

Monthly subscription - $9.99Pay per view - $4.99Access through your institutionLogin with Underline account
Need help?
Contact us
Lecture placeholder background
VIDEO DOI: https://doi.org/10.48448/4w0y-fp42

poster

AMA Research Challenge 2024

November 07, 2024

Virtual only, United States

Cadaveric Simulation for Hip Protection in Acetabular Tumor Cryoablation

Background Cryoablation of acetabular bone lesions risks femoral head osteonecrosis and chondrolysis due to ablation zone propagation through the joint. Traditional thermal insulation methods with gases and fluids are inadequate as they fill the joint recess around the neck. A prior case report suggested hip distraction during acetabular cryoablation can prevent femoral head osteonecrosis. This study utilized a cadaveric model to simulate cryoablation propagation and assess the effectiveness of hip joint distraction for thermal protection.

Methods A cadaver model was used to replicate hip joint distraction during acetabular cryoablation. Three conditions were compared: no intervention (control), intra-articular fluid injection, and hip distraction. The cadaver, warmed to body temperature, underwent 15 pounds of traction to create an 8mm distraction distance. A thermocouple probe placed in the femoral head recorded temperatures every minute during a 10-minute cryoablation treatment. The procedure, using a cryoprobe advanced through a coaxial needle under CT fluoroscopic guidance, simulated a previous case report.

Results Linear regression analysis showed slopes of -1.47, -1.40, and -0.33 for control, liquid, and distraction conditions, respectively. F-tests indicated significant temperature variance differences between control vs. distracted (p<0.0001) and control vs. liquid (p<0.0001), but not between liquid and distraction (p=0.45). The distraction condition maintained a more stable temperature than both the liquid-injected and control conditions.

Conclusion Osteonecrosis and chondrolysis are common complications of cryoablation due to inadequate insulation of the femoral head and acetabulum. This cadaveric study validates hip distraction as a protective method from thermal injury during cryoablation.

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2024

Diagnostic Breast Imaging Performance in Pregnant and Lactating Patients
poster

Diagnostic Breast Imaging Performance in Pregnant and Lactating Patients

AMA Research Challenge 2024

Abigail Keller

07 November 2024

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved