Lecture image placeholder

Premium content

Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

Monthly subscription - $9.99Pay per view - $4.99Access through your institutionLogin with Underline account
Need help?
Contact us
Lecture placeholder background
VIDEO DOI: https://doi.org/10.48448/j7e3-mm19

poster

AMA Research Challenge 2024

November 07, 2024

Virtual only, United States

Obesity is Associated With Greater Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Body mass index (BMI) cutoffs are frequently implemented for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) candidates. However, recent data in primary TKA suggest obese patients have greater improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and no difference in postoperative complications when utilizing standardized medical optimization protocols. This study evaluated the influence of BMI on PROMs following revision TKA using these optimization protocols. The null hypothesis of the study was there would be no difference in PROMs based on BMI following revision TKA.

Methods Between 2010 and 2022, 572 consecutive revision TKAs were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent risk assessment and medical clearance prior to surgery by a designated internal medicine specialist. Cases were dichotomized into two BMI groups, ≥35kg/m2 and <35kg/m2 (range, 20 to 65kg/m2). Activity level, pain, function, and satisfaction were compared between groups, controlling for multiple comorbidities and case characteristics. The BMI ≥35kg/m2 group was younger; had a higher prevalence of depression/anxiety and pre-revision narcotics; and worse pre-revision PROMs (P≤0.090). Multivariate statistical analysis was performed with P<0.05 as significant.

Results Patients with a BMI ≥35 demonstrated greater improvement in their Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and experienced less pain when walking and climbing stairs (P≤0.071) over an average of 2.0 years. A higher percentage of patients in the BMI ≥35 group also achieved Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) for PROMs (46-67% compared to 59-70%). Moreover, the BMI ≥35 group reported higher satisfaction levels (72.2% versus 66.5%, P=0.254), and more patients indicated that their knee 'always' feels normal (28.4% versus 19.8%, P=0.149). The groups did not differ by the indication for revision surgery or the number of components revised (P≥0.108). However, those who needed revision due to aseptic loosening showed significantly greater improvements in PROMs. There was no difference in the rate of re-revisions between the two groups for aseptic loosening or infection.

Conclusion Despite being more debilitated preoperatively, revision TKA patients with a BMI ≥35 experienced greater improvements in PROMs compared to patients with lower BMIs, independent of revision indication. Given the significant improvements in PROMs with appropriate perioperative optimization, obese patients should not be restricted access to revision TKA when appropriately indicated.

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2024

Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Safe in High BMI Patients
poster

Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Safe in High BMI Patients

AMA Research Challenge 2024

Wesley Day

07 November 2024

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved