Lecture image placeholder

Premium content

Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

Monthly subscription - $9.99Pay per view - $4.99Access through your institutionLogin with Underline account
Need help?
Contact us
Lecture placeholder background
VIDEO DOI: https://doi.org/10.48448/qmwv-b032

poster

AMA Research Challenge 2024

November 07, 2024

Virtual only, United States

Impact of Donor Cause of Death and Geographic Location on Recipient Mortality Post Heart Transplant- a UNOS Database Review

Background It is unclear whether heart donor cause of death (CoD) influences recipient mortality and if cardiovascular risk varies by region. By analyzing the UNOS database, it can be determined if donor CoD impacts recipient post-transplant mortality and if regional differences influence cardiovascular health.

Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried for all adult heart transplant recipients and donors from 1987 to 2023 in Southern, Western, Northeastern, and Midwest states. Donors were grouped by CoD, including anoxia, gunshot wounds/trauma (GSW), intracranial bleed/stroke (IS/B), and other causes of death. Unadjusted and adjusted mortality was compared.

Results Of the 56,901 patients included in this analysis, GSW donors accounted for the smallest number of donors (18.13%, p <0.001), the lowest number of female donors (11.38%, p <0.001), and the youngest patients (26.85 ± 9.54, p <0.001). IS/B donors had the highest donor age (40.26 ± 11.19, p <0.001) and the highest number of female donors (11.19%, p <0.001). Mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years varies significantly according to the CoD (p<0.001). Recipients of IS/B hearts had worse mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years post-transplant (6.55%, 14.67%, and 30.04%). Recipients from GSW donors had the best mortality rates 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years following transplant (4.60%, 11.42%, and 26.44%). When adjusting for covariables and mortality by region compared to the Northeast, the South had the increased mortality (hazard ratio HR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval CI = 1.06-1.13, p <0.001) and the West had decreased mortality (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.97, p <0.001). When comparing other donor CoD to GSW, IS/B, and anoxia donor CoD within each region, there were no significant differences in mortality rates.

Conclusion This study looked at geographical differences in donor CoD and mortality rates. The mortality of heart transplant recipients varies according to the CoD of the donor, even when adjusted for different regions. No significant differences were observed when analyzing each region individually according to the donor CoD.

Next from AMA Research Challenge 2024

Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes during Cardiogenic Shock or High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
poster

Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes during Cardiogenic Shock or High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AMA Research Challenge 2024

Ogechukwu Obi

07 November 2024

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved