Background Mobile low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screenings (LCS) are part of an outreach program in rural Appalachia to detect early malignancy in areas with limited healthcare access. While the primary goal is to screen for lung cancer, LDCT LCS can identify calcium deposits in coronary arteries and can prompt risk modification strategies for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. There is no clear guidance for follow-up regarding CAC or prevention of associated CVD risk in patients undergoing LDCT LCS. The aim of this study was to determine how many patients with no known CVD had the presence of CAC on LDCT LCS. Secondary objectives were to determine if patients with CAC scores ≥100 received appropriate CVD risk reduction follow-up, and if initiation of statin or aspirin therapy occurred within 3 months after LDCT LCS.

Methods A retrospective review of mobile LDCT LCS from September 2021 to December 2022 was conducted in one large, tertiary health-system. Adult patients with no previous CVD history were included. CT images were obtained at 100 kVp with a slice thickness of 3 mm. Agatston CAC scoring was completed retroactively. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were utilized.

Results A total of 526 LDCT LCS were included. Over 54% of patients had coronary calcification on LDCT lung screening. 161 patients (30.6%) had a CAC score of ≥100 and 75 patients (14.3%) had a CAC score ≥400. Of patients with a CAC score ≥100, only 7.5% received referrals for follow-up and 9.3% had additional cardiac testing. Of those with a CAC score ≥100 not already on a statin (45.3%), only 8.2% were initiated on statin therapy within 3 months after LDCT LCS. Of those with a CAC score ≥100 not already on aspirin therapy (63.3%), only 5.9% were initiated on aspirin therapy within 3 months after LDCT LCS. Aspirin and statin initiations were dependent on calcium score (p<0.01).

Conclusion In patients with no CVD history, CAC was frequently identified on mobile LDCT LCS in rural communities. Calcium scoring from LDCT lung screenings allowed for simultaneous assessment of lung cancer and CVD risk. Despite high CAC scores, there was limited initiation of cardiovascular disease prevention measures and follow-up, likely indicating missed opportunities for early intervention. Awareness of CAC score utility, follow-up for identified coronary calcification, and consideration of primary prevention medications when indicated, would be beneficial in patients undergoing LDCT lung cancer screenings, especially in rural areas with limited resources.