Lecture image placeholder

Premium content

Access to this content requires a subscription. You must be a premium user to view this content.

Monthly subscription - $9.99Pay per view - $4.99Access through your institutionLogin with Underline account
Need help?
Contact us
Lecture placeholder background

workshop paper

ACL 2024

August 15, 2024

Bangkok, Thailand

To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate. That is the Question: A Case Study on Annotation Subjectivity in Span Prediction

keywords:

data perspectivism

human label variation

span prediction

legal nlp

sequence tagging

This paper explores the task of automatic prediction of text spans in a legal problem description that support a legal area label. We use a corpus of problem descriptions written by laypeople in English that is annotated by practising lawyers. Inherent subjectivity exists in our task because legal area categorisation is a complex task, and lawyers often have different views on a problem. Experiments show that training on majority-voted spans outperforms training on disaggregated ones.

Next from ACL 2024

A Systematic Analysis on the Temporal Generalization of Language Models in Social Media
workshop paper

A Systematic Analysis on the Temporal Generalization of Language Models in Social Media

ACL 2024

Jose Camacho-ColladosAsahi Ushio
Asahi Ushio and 1 other author

15 August 2024

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

Select topic of interest (you can select more than one)

PRESENTATIONS

  • All Lectures
  • For Librarians
  • Resource Center
  • Free Trial
Underline Science, Inc.
1216 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

© 2023 Underline - All rights reserved