Open-domain dialogue system usually requires different sources of knowledge to generate more informative and evidential responses. However, existing knowledge-grounded dialogue systems either focus on a single knowledge source or overlook the dependency between multiple sources of knowledge, which may result in generating inconsistent or even paradoxical responses. To incorporate multiple knowledge sources and dependencies between them, we propose SAFARI, a novel framework that leverages the exceptional capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in planning, understanding, and incorporating under both supervised and unsupervised settings. Specifically, SAFARI decouples the knowledge grounding into multiple sources and response generation, which allows easy extension to various knowledge sources including the possibility of not using any sources. To study the problem, we construct a personalized knowledge-grounded dialogue dataset Knowledge Behind Persona (KBP), which is the first to consider the dependency between persona and implicit knowledge. Experimental results on the KBP dataset demonstrate that the SAFARI framework can effectively produce persona-consistent and knowledge-enhanced responses.

Large Language Models as Source Planner for Personalized Knowledge-grounded Dialogues

Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capacity at planning and executing a high-level goal in a live computer environment (e.g. MiniWoB++). To perform a task, recent works often require a model to learn from trace examples of the task via either supervised learning or few/many-shot prompting. Without these trace examples, it remains a challenge how an agent can autonomously learn and improve its control on a computer, which limits the ability of an agent to perform a new task. We approach this problem with a zero-shot agent that requires no given expert traces. Our agent plans for executable actions on a partially observed environment, and iteratively progresses a task by identifying and learning from its mistakes via self-reflection and structured thought management. On the easy tasks of MiniWoB++, we show that our zero-shot agent often outperforms recent SoTAs, with more efficient reasoning. For tasks with more complexity, our reflective agent performs on par with prior best models, even though previous works had the advantages of accessing expert traces or additional screen information.

A Zero-Shot Language Agent for Computer Control with Structured Reflection

As AI technologies are advancing rapidly, they must be designed with humans at the forefront. AI is increasingly used in various industries, from healthcare and finance to transportation and entertainment, to automate tasks, improve decision-making, and even co-create talk abstracts. While such systems can improve performance, they may also result in over-reliance and other unintended consequences. Human-centered design and evaluation are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this talk, I'll present a recipe for designing effective human-AI interaction by considering human needs, AI capabilities, and their interaction, and utilizing human-centered research techniques and evaluation metrics. To demonstrate this recipe in action, I’ll present two case studies: interactive summarization and interactive topic modeling, which highlight the value of considering both human and AI factors when building AI systems.

Designing for the human-in-the-loop: techniques for learning *about* interaction

Inverse Text Normalization (ITN) involves rewriting the verbalised form of text from spoken transcripts to its corresponding written form. The task inherently expects challenges in identifying ITN entries due to spelling variations in words arising out of dialects, transcription errors etc. Additionally, in Tamil, word boundaries between adjacent words in a sentence often get obscured due to Punarchi, i.e. phonetic transformation of these boundaries. Being morphologically rich, the words in Tamil show a high degree of agglutination due to inflection and clitics. The combination of such factors leads to a high degree of surfaceform variations, making scalability with pure rule-based approaches difficult. Instead, we experiment with fine-tuning three pre-trained neural LMs, consisting of a seq2seq model (s2s), a non-autoregressive text editor (NAR) and a sequence tagger + rules combination (tagger). While the tagger approach works best in a fully-supervised setting, s2s performs the best (98.05 F-Score) when augmented with additional data, via bootstrapping and data augmentation (DA&B). S2S reports a cumulative percentage improvement of 20.1 %, and statistically significant gains for all our models with DA&B. Compared to a fully supervised setup, bootstrapping alone reports a percentage improvement as high as 14.12 %, even with a small seed set of 324 ITN entries.

Scaling Neural ITN for Numbers and Temporal Expressions in Tamil: Findings for an Agglutinative Low-resource Language | VIDEO

Large language models capture knowledge and abilities learned from their pre-training data, which is typically limited to text and code. We present approaches for *grounding* these LLMs to carry out tasks that involve visual perception and reasoning. Our methods leverage LLMs' abilities to generate (1) dialogue (2) questions and (3) code, putting these to use in a series of visual dialogue tasks where people interact with models in perceptually-complex settings.

Interacting with LLMs for Grounded Tasks

Many real-world tasks involve a mixed-initiative setup, wherein humans and AI systems collaboratively perform a task. While significant work has been conducted towards enabling humans to specify, through language, exactly how an agent should complete a task (i.e., low-level specification), prior work lacks on interpreting the high-level strategic intent of the human commanders. Parsing strategic intent from language will allow autonomous systems to independently operate according to the user's plan without frequent guidance or instruction. In this paper, we build a computational interface capable of translating unstructured language strategies into actionable intent in the form of goals and constraints. Leveraging a game environment, we collect a dataset of over 1000 examples, mapping language strategies to the corresponding goals and constraints, and show that our model, trained on this dataset, significantly outperforms human interpreters in inferring strategic intent (i.e., goals and constraints) from language (p < 0.05). Furthermore, we show that our model (125M parameters) significantly outperforms ChatGPT for this task (p < 0.05) in a low-data setting.

A Computational Interface to Translate Strategic Intent from Unstructured Language in a Low-Data Setting | VIDEO

We present 1-PAGER the first system that answers a question and retrieves evidence using a single Transformer-based model and decoding process. 1-PAGER incrementally partitions the retrieval corpus using constrained decoding to select a document and answer string, and we show that this is competitive with comparable retrieve-and-read alternatives according to both retrieval and answer accuracy metrics. 1-PAGER also outperforms the equivalent ‘closed-book’ question answering model, by grounding predictions in an evidence corpus. While 1-PAGER is not yet on-par with more expensive systems that read many more documents before generating an answer, we argue that it provides an important step toward attributed generation by folding retrieval into the sequence-to-sequence paradigm that is currently dominant in NLP. We also show that the search paths used to partition the corpus are easy to read and understand, paving a way forward for interpretable neural retrieval.

1-Pager: One Pass Answer Generation and Evidence Retrieval

The presentation titled "CLMSM: A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Pre-training on Procedural Text" introduces a novel framework designed to enhance the processing and understanding of procedural text. CLMSM stands out by its unique approach of utilizing metadata from procedures, integrating a Contrastive Learning strategy for global context comprehension, and employing Masked Step Modeling to capture local context nuances. This framework addresses the inherent challenge in procedural text processing – the need for a temporal understanding and tracking of entities across steps, a critical aspect that conventional pre-training methods like Masked Language Modeling (MLM) often overlook.

In this presentation, we demonstrate how CLMSM significantly outperforms various baseline models in entity tracking tasks, underscoring the importance of in-domain pre-training for accurately learning temporal and entity-based information in procedures. The results are particularly notable in scenarios requiring the tracking of entities with implicit locations, highlighting CLMSM’s advanced knowledge retention capabilities. Additionally, we present insights into CLMSM's adaptability to out-of-domain tasks, further establishing its versatility. This framework not only sets a new standard in procedural text understanding but also opens avenues for future research, particularly in extending its applicability to other domains with procedural text, potentially unveiling new challenges and opportunities.

CLMSM: A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Pre-training on Procedural Text

Ontonotes has served as the most important benchmark for coreference resolution. However, for ease of annotation, several long documents in Ontonotes were split into smaller parts. In this work, we build a corpus of coreference-annotated documents of significantly longer length than what is currently available. We do so by providing an accurate, manually-curated, merging of annotations from documents that were split into multiple parts in the original Ontonotes annotation process. The resulting corpus, which we call LongtoNotes contains documents in multiple genres of the English language with varying lengths, the longest of which are up to 8x the length of documents in Ontonotes, and 2x those in Litbank. We evaluate state-of-the-art neural coreference systems on this new corpus, analyze the relationships between model architectures/hyperparameters and document length on performance and efficiency of the models, and demonstrate areas of improvement in long-document coreference modeling revealed by our new corpus.

LongtoNotes: OntoNotes with Longer Coreference Chain

One of the frequent points in the mainstream narrative about large language models is that they have “emergent properties” (sometimes even dangerous enough to be considered existential risk to mankind). However, there is much disagreement about even the very definition of such properties. If they are understood as a kind of generalization beyond training data - as something that a model does without being explicitly trained for it - I argue that we have not in fact established the existence of any such properties, and at the moment we do not even have the methodology for doing so.

A sanity check on emergent properties

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in utilizing tools, but their ability is limited by API availability and the instability of implicit reasoning, particularly when both planning and execution are involved. To overcome these limitations, we propose CREATOR, a novel framework that enables LLMs to create their own tools using documentation and code realization. CREATOR disentangles abstract tool creation and concrete decision execution, resulting in improved performance. We evaluate CREATOR on MATH and TabMWP benchmarks, respectively consisting of challenging math competition problems and diverse tabular contents. Remarkably, CREATOR outperforms existing chain-of-thought, program-of-thought, and tool-using baselines. Additionally, we introduce the Creation Challenge dataset, featuring 2K diverse questions, to emphasize the necessity and benefits of LLMs' tool creation ability. Further research demonstrates that leveraging LLMs as tool creators facilitates knowledge transfer, and LLMs exhibit varying levels of tool creation abilities, enabling them to adapt to diverse situations. The tool creation ability revolutionizes the LLM's problem-solving paradigm, driving us closer to the next frontier of artificial intelligence.

CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models

The prevalence and salience of LMs has changed the way many researchers in NLP think about our work, causing many issues for model evaluation. This presentation presents a retrospective of recent past approaches to modeling text, and discusses what has changed, and what the current evaluation challenges are. Next, it discusses common pitfalls that LM-based research falls into, highlighting several fallacies, and suggesting ways to avoid them. Finally, this presentation highlights the importance of meta-evaluation research (the evaluation of our evaluations) as one crucial component to overcoming LM evaluation challenges in the post LM-boom.

Underline digital video library

Large Language Models as Source Planner for Personalized Knowledge-grounded Dialogues

A Zero-Shot Language Agent for Computer Control with Structured Reflection

Designing for the human-in-the-loop: techniques for learning about interaction

Scaling Neural ITN for Numbers and Temporal Expressions in Tamil: Findings for an Agglutinative Low-resource Language | VIDEO

Interacting with LLMs for Grounded Tasks

A Computational Interface to Translate Strategic Intent from Unstructured Language in a Low-Data Setting | VIDEO

1-Pager: One Pass Answer Generation and Evidence Retrieval

CLMSM: A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Pre-training on Procedural Text

LongtoNotes: OntoNotes with Longer Coreference Chain

A sanity check on emergent properties

CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models

Evaluation after the LM boom: Frustrations, fallacies andthe future

Stay up to date with the latest Underline news!

PRESENTATIONS

CONFERENCES

COMPANY

RESOURCES